360MoTioN wrote

Fielding wrote

Dont_Flop wrote

Fielding wrote

Dont_Flop wrote

Fielding wrote Bony to City for around 30m.

Great signing but 30m??? Really???

Given the current situation city currently find themselves in, Swansea will know that they are in need of a decent striker that can cement his place in the first team and will look to get the largest fee possible for, lets be honest, their best player.

i think 30 Mill is a fair price tag in todays market, look at the goals he scores week in week out and has done in the Prem for a while now.

I know, I thought 20m would be a fair price, dont understand the 30m.

Saw a valuation of Hazard at 99m before, i burst out laughing

If you can sell someone for 80m-90m Euros then you really do have to ask how messed up the current valuations of players are these days. Yeah Bale is an amazing footballer but 80m? never. all that transfer did was increase the value of most top tier footballers on the planet by 10m-25m

Realistically, Hazard 55m, Bale 65m, Ronaldo 90m, Messi 120m.

Maximum prices

Surely prices should be capped since the financial fair play came into place.

No player over 100mil I think.

Brad- wrote

360MoTioN wrote

Fielding wrote

Dont_Flop wrote

Fielding wrote

Dont_Flop wrote

Fielding wrote Bony to City for around 30m.

Great signing but 30m??? Really???

Given the current situation city currently find themselves in, Swansea will know that they are in need of a decent striker that can cement his place in the first team and will look to get the largest fee possible for, lets be honest, their best player.

i think 30 Mill is a fair price tag in todays market, look at the goals he scores week in week out and has done in the Prem for a while now.

I know, I thought 20m would be a fair price, dont understand the 30m.

Saw a valuation of Hazard at 99m before, i burst out laughing

If you can sell someone for 80m-90m Euros then you really do have to ask how messed up the current valuations of players are these days. Yeah Bale is an amazing footballer but 80m? never. all that transfer did was increase the value of most top tier footballers on the planet by 10m-25m

Realistically, Hazard 55m, Bale 65m, Ronaldo 90m, Messi 120m.

Maximum prices

Surely prices should be capped since the financial fair play came into place.

No player over 100mil I think.

Definitely not. When you consider the financial benefits of signing a big name. Let's use Messi as an example, if Chelsea signed him, they would make so much from shirt sales around the world, a lot more sponsors would want to be associated, it would instantly turn us into a global brand all because of 1 signing. That has to be considered in a player's price.

360MoTioN wrote

Brad- wrote

360MoTioN wrote

Fielding wrote

Dont_Flop wrote

Fielding wrote

Dont_Flop wrote

Fielding wrote Bony to City for around 30m.

Great signing but 30m??? Really???

Given the current situation city currently find themselves in, Swansea will know that they are in need of a decent striker that can cement his place in the first team and will look to get the largest fee possible for, lets be honest, their best player.

i think 30 Mill is a fair price tag in todays market, look at the goals he scores week in week out and has done in the Prem for a while now.

I know, I thought 20m would be a fair price, dont understand the 30m.

Saw a valuation of Hazard at 99m before, i burst out laughing

If you can sell someone for 80m-90m Euros then you really do have to ask how messed up the current valuations of players are these days. Yeah Bale is an amazing footballer but 80m? never. all that transfer did was increase the value of most top tier footballers on the planet by 10m-25m

Realistically, Hazard 55m, Bale 65m, Ronaldo 90m, Messi 120m.

Maximum prices

Surely prices should be capped since the financial fair play came into place.

No player over 100mil I think.

Definitely not. When you consider the financial benefits of signing a big name. Let's use Messi as an example, if Chelsea signed him, they would make so much from shirt sales around the world, a lot more sponsors would want to be associated, it would instantly turn us into a global brand all because of 1 signing. That has to be considered in a player's price.

For a team like Chelsea to buy Messi they'd have to save up for quite a long time. I'm actually being fair to other teams who wouldn't be able to sign that sort of calibre of player.

The only teams that can actually afford to spend 100mil every year are Bayern, Real Madrid, Barcelona and United.

360MoTioN wrote

Brad- wrote

360MoTioN wrote

Fielding wrote

Dont_Flop wrote

Fielding wrote

Dont_Flop wrote

Fielding wrote Bony to City for around 30m.

Great signing but 30m??? Really???

Given the current situation city currently find themselves in, Swansea will know that they are in need of a decent striker that can cement his place in the first team and will look to get the largest fee possible for, lets be honest, their best player.

i think 30 Mill is a fair price tag in todays market, look at the goals he scores week in week out and has done in the Prem for a while now.

I know, I thought 20m would be a fair price, dont understand the 30m.

Saw a valuation of Hazard at 99m before, i burst out laughing

If you can sell someone for 80m-90m Euros then you really do have to ask how messed up the current valuations of players are these days. Yeah Bale is an amazing footballer but 80m? never. all that transfer did was increase the value of most top tier footballers on the planet by 10m-25m

Realistically, Hazard 55m, Bale 65m, Ronaldo 90m, Messi 120m.

Maximum prices

Surely prices should be capped since the financial fair play came into place.

No player over 100mil I think.

Definitely not. When you consider the financial benefits of signing a big name. Let's use Messi as an example, if Chelsea signed him, they would make so much from shirt sales around the world, a lot more sponsors would want to be associated, it would instantly turn us into a global brand all because of 1 signing. That has to be considered in a player's price.

For a team like Chelsea to buy Messi they'd have to save up for quite a long time. I'm actually being fair to other teams who wouldn't be able to sign that sort of calibre of player.

The only teams that can actually afford to spend 100mil every year are Bayern, Real Madrid, Barcelona and United.

CompleteDesigns wrote We can afford him though , We made profit last season , We have literally every young player worth noting (Ok not quite , But look at the amount of talent we have) who we can offload whenever we want , Constantly getting into champs leauge + doing well , If messi came here we would sell atleast willian and andre (We would get the cash up front)

Messis transfer fee would be split beetween however long his contract is (EG 5 year contract 40M per year and not 200M straight away) , We could afford him if we wanted ,We would have to make some adjustments but its doable.

Brad- wrote

CompleteDesigns wrote We can afford him though , We made profit last season , We have literally every young player worth noting (Ok not quite , But look at the amount of talent we have) who we can offload whenever we want , Constantly getting into champs leauge + doing well , If messi came here we would sell atleast willian and andre (We would get the cash up front)

Messis transfer fee would be split beetween however long his contract is (EG 5 year contract 40M per year and not 200M straight away) , We could afford him if we wanted ,We would have to make some adjustments but its doable.

So you want to offload 40million pounds worth of players every year for the next 5 years?

CompleteDesigns wrote

360MoTioN wrote

Brad- wrote

360MoTioN wrote

Fielding wrote

Dont_Flop wrote

Fielding wrote

Dont_Flop wrote

Fielding wrote Bony to City for around 30m.

Great signing but 30m??? Really???

Given the current situation city currently find themselves in, Swansea will know that they are in need of a decent striker that can cement his place in the first team and will look to get the largest fee possible for, lets be honest, their best player.

i think 30 Mill is a fair price tag in todays market, look at the goals he scores week in week out and has done in the Prem for a while now.

I know, I thought 20m would be a fair price, dont understand the 30m.

Saw a valuation of Hazard at 99m before, i burst out laughing

If you can sell someone for 80m-90m Euros then you really do have to ask how messed up the current valuations of players are these days. Yeah Bale is an amazing footballer but 80m? never. all that transfer did was increase the value of most top tier footballers on the planet by 10m-25m

Realistically, Hazard 55m, Bale 65m, Ronaldo 90m, Messi 120m.

Maximum prices

Surely prices should be capped since the financial fair play came into place.

No player over 100mil I think.

Definitely not. When you consider the financial benefits of signing a big name. Let's use Messi as an example, if Chelsea signed him, they would make so much from shirt sales around the world, a lot more sponsors would want to be associated, it would instantly turn us into a global brand all because of 1 signing. That has to be considered in a player's price.

For a team like Chelsea to buy Messi they'd have to save up for quite a long time. I'm actually being fair to other teams who wouldn't be able to sign that sort of calibre of player.

The only teams that can actually afford to spend 100mil every year are Bayern, Real Madrid, Barcelona and United.

We can afford him though , We made profit last season , We have literally every young player worth noting (Ok not quite , But look at the amount of talent we have) who we can offload whenever we want , Constantly getting into champs leauge + doing well , If messi came here we would sell atleast willian and andre (We would get the cash up front)

Messis transfer fee would be split beetween however long his contract is (EG 5 year contract 40M per year and not 200M straight away) , We could afford him if we wanted ,We would have to make some adjustments but its doable.

SlipMode wrote I didn't want to quote all these replies because it was becoming ridiculous, but I saw someone laugh at the value of Hazard for 99mil - Just weighing in here, if a club had that spare, currently a price tag that some clubs can afford, the likes of Real Madrid/City/maybe Utd why not? Chelsea obviously won't ever get rid of him cheaply, and if a club can buy Bale for 86mil then I dont see why not Hazard for more