Alfa wrote

AnimeHypedUp wrote

Alfa wrote I kind of want to see who said ISIS shouldn't be taken out. This situation is horrible and all too surreal. I have never in my lifetime experienced fearing my safety until now. I just feel like ISIS is actually capable of doing something and it scares me.

If you're talking about nuclear wise no nothing like that is going to happen because they don't have that. The only thing I fear is the US troops going in to eliminate ISIS.

No I know that won't happen. I think that is a tad bit out of their range in terms of funding. I am talking about the supposed terrorists ISIS has on ground in the US. And why do you fear the US troops fighting ISIS?

Because when a war 1st starts more troops get killed. And ISIS isn't going to step onto america? Where did you hear that?

AnimeHypedUp wrote

Alfa wrote

AnimeHypedUp wrote

Alfa wrote I kind of want to see who said ISIS shouldn't be taken out. This situation is horrible and all too surreal. I have never in my lifetime experienced fearing my safety until now. I just feel like ISIS is actually capable of doing something and it scares me.

If you're talking about nuclear wise no nothing like that is going to happen because they don't have that. The only thing I fear is the US troops going in to eliminate ISIS.

No I know that won't happen. I think that is a tad bit out of their range in terms of funding. I am talking about the supposed terrorists ISIS has on ground in the US. And why do you fear the US troops fighting ISIS?

Because when a war 1st starts more troops get killed. And ISIS isn't going to step onto america? Where did you hear that?

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

I also heard my home state of new jersey was gearing up with the national guard.

Alfa wrote

AnimeHypedUp wrote

Alfa wrote

AnimeHypedUp wrote

Alfa wrote I kind of want to see who said ISIS shouldn't be taken out. This situation is horrible and all too surreal. I have never in my lifetime experienced fearing my safety until now. I just feel like ISIS is actually capable of doing something and it scares me.

If you're talking about nuclear wise no nothing like that is going to happen because they don't have that. The only thing I fear is the US troops going in to eliminate ISIS.

No I know that won't happen. I think that is a tad bit out of their range in terms of funding. I am talking about the supposed terrorists ISIS has on ground in the US. And why do you fear the US troops fighting ISIS?

Because when a war 1st starts more troops get killed. And ISIS isn't going to step onto america? Where did you hear that?

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

I also heard my home state of new jersey was gearing up with the national guard.

Hmm, Interesting. They probably won't get past our National Guard just saying lol so don't be scared.

Alfa wrote I kind of want to see who said ISIS shouldn't be taken out. This situation is horrible and all too surreal. I have never in my lifetime experienced fearing my safety until now. I just feel like ISIS is actually capable of doing something and it scares me.

I voted no because I know he's really saying, 'Who thinks ISIS should be bombed into oblivion?' which I don't think is the right way of solving the situation, or even if it does solve the situation, it'll just create a power vacuum and another group like this will end up taking over in another 10 years time.

An endless cycle has started, and doing the same thing isn't going to change anything.

Literate wrote

Alfa wrote I kind of want to see who said ISIS shouldn't be taken out. This situation is horrible and all too surreal. I have never in my lifetime experienced fearing my safety until now. I just feel like ISIS is actually capable of doing something and it scares me.

I voted no because I know he's really saying, 'Who thinks ISIS should be bombed into oblivion?' which I don't think is the right way of solving the situation, or even if it does solve the situation, it'll just create a power vacuum and another group like this will end up taking over in another 10 years time.

An endless cycle has started, and doing the same thing isn't going to change anything.

Ok I get what you mean now. The way I interpreted it was "Who think's ISIS should be left alone". I think there should be something done at the least but massive bombing cycles aren't the answer like you said.

Alfa wrote

Literate wrote

Alfa wrote I kind of want to see who said ISIS shouldn't be taken out. This situation is horrible and all too surreal. I have never in my lifetime experienced fearing my safety until now. I just feel like ISIS is actually capable of doing something and it scares me.

I voted no because I know he's really saying, 'Who thinks ISIS should be bombed into oblivion?' which I don't think is the right way of solving the situation, or even if it does solve the situation, it'll just create a power vacuum and another group like this will end up taking over in another 10 years time.

An endless cycle has started, and doing the same thing isn't going to change anything.

Ok I get what you mean now. The way I interpreted it was "Who think's ISIS should be left alone". I think there should be something done at the least but massive bombing cycles aren't the answer like you said.

That's just my reasoning though, you might still have a bone to pick with the other 3 who voted no.

Miss wrote

-Dylan_ wrote

Miss wrote

-Dylan_ wrote

Literate wrote

-Dylan_ wrote Keep bombing them! This is the first time I have agreed with Obama's decisions during his whole entire presidency.

8 Civilians for every 30 militants dead.
You find that acceptable?

I guess so. If it stops them from attempting to penetrate America, do what needs to be done.

That's the problem with this world right here.

What's the problem? Explain. Is it bad that I think if a terrorist group is beheading our citizens that we should attack them?

That's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about what you said about the civilians. We're all humans, we can't just treat those civilians there like dirt just because they're not 'American'. How would you like it if say USUS (Cheap knock off of ISIS, USA version) was here in America doing what ISIS was doing and say Russia was bombing them and killing civilians here? Would you say that's fine too?

Again as a Soldier for US Army...When they start involving American citizens we are going to get involved and yes if it is neccessary to stop them and we have to kill 8 civilians for 30 militants then it is going to happen...we have to keep our land free from terrorist...No if am not happy that they have killed civilians but for all we know those civilians have been involved with ISIS...we may never know...if they are not then why are they so close to ISIS base....you just have to do what is needed

Keep it free from terrorist, huh? To me, it seems like by your definition (and most) that terrorist only come from the Middle East. Which is totally wrong and why this "war" on it will never end, especially approaching it like the way you say, ever.

Grossman wrote When they start involving American citizens we are going to get involved

They involved American citizens by killing them to stop the US from bombing. The US stops bombing and American citizens stop dying. This just shows how misaligned your intentions are from your President's. If either of you wanted American citizens to stop dying, you would be fully against this bombing.

and yes, if it is necessary to stop them and we have to kill 8 civilians for 30 militants then it is going to happen...we have to keep our land free from terrorist

As Miss said, Islamic extremists aren't the only form of terrorist.
I can't quite understand what kind of sadistic person it takes to say that the loss of any innocent lives is 'necessary.'
Dostoevsky said that if it meant the whole of humanity could spend eternity in Heaven if one, innocent, small boy suffered, it wouldn't be worth it.
I wonder how much more peaceful the world would be if we all had that mindset.
Also, what if they were American aid workers who happened to be in the area of where one of the bombs were dropped. Would you still consider those lives to be 'necessary' losses?

No, I am not happy that they have killed civilians but for all we know those civilians have been involved with ISIS...we may never know...if they are not then why are they so close to ISIS base....you just have to do what is needed

ISIS chooses to set up near civilian centres to deter bombings, but the US doesn't care.
'We may never know' and yet your criminal justice system is based on 'Innocent until proven guilty.'
These people are getting a death sentence, without a trial, for a crime there is no evidence they have committed.

Al-Qaeda-linked Al-Nusra Front has issued a new threatening audio message featuring its leader warning the West will pay the heaviest price for its actions. The Syrian group is reportedly now joining up with the estranged Islamic State militants.

The leader of Syrias most prominent terrorist group, Abu Mohamad al-Golani, in denouncing the US-led air strike campaign, has urged Westerners everywhere to do the same by standing against the decisions of your rulers, otherwise bloodshed would be brought to their soil.

"Muslims will not watch while their sons are bombed. Your leaders will not be the only ones who would pay the price of the war. You will pay the heaviest price," Reuters cited him as saying. He threatened viewers that the fight would be brought to the hearts of your homes.