You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
Logical Ideas that prove Gods existence
Posted:

Logical Ideas that prove Gods existencePosted:

InfinityWardrobe
  • Powerhouse
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 25, 201113Year Member
Posts: 412
Reputation Power: 16
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 25, 201113Year Member
Posts: 412
Reputation Power: 16
Point 1
If you are an atheist, you do not believe in God. In order for you not to believe in God, you must have an understanding of what you oppose before you begin to disagree with it. Without an understanding of what God is you wouldnt be able to disagree with the idea of it wouldn't you? So you accept that the very idea you oppose is the Greatest thing ever that is an Omnipotent being of perfection which you are entitled to have an opinion against.

Point 2
Go and get an item of food from the Kitchen that you enjoy eating. Hold out both of your hands palms up. In your right hand IMAGINE the item and in the left hand HOLD the item. Which would you rather have, the imaginary or the existent item? Obviously you would rather have the existent item that the imaginary one.

Conclusion.

You agree that what you oppose, "God" is the greatest thing ever, that is an Omnipotent being of perfection. You also agree that to exist is better than not existing. Because God is all powerful and in order to claim the "title" of the creator of the universe, regardless of your belief, he must be perfect and hold all qualities of every aspect of life. Since we exist and to exist is better than not God must share this attribute with us in order to be the being that you oppose. By god being within your mind he must also be in existence because being a part of your mind is being inferior to the potential perfection he would hold from being existent.
#2. Posted:
Higuain
  • Powerhouse
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 08, 201013Year Member
Posts: 487
Reputation Power: 19
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 08, 201013Year Member
Posts: 487
Reputation Power: 19
What a load of SHIT.

You're using rhetorical questions to seem like you're correct.

It is CLEAR that evolution is the answer, if you think otherwise, Sure, go for it, But you're an idiot.
#3. Posted:
InfinityWardrobe
  • Powerhouse
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 25, 201113Year Member
Posts: 412
Reputation Power: 16
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 25, 201113Year Member
Posts: 412
Reputation Power: 16
I myself am not a Christian at all but upon hearing of what is known as Anselms Ontological Argument, what you have just read, i have decided that there must be a creator but I will not worship it because if he created me then there was a reason for it and i shouldn't need to pray nor worship to improve my quality of life. I am here for a reason and nothing can change that. I am not an evolutionist but nor a creationist, God may have created the world, be it as the result of 6 days of work or maybe even a billion years, i refuse to follow the bible and its stories. Please note this is my opinion and I do not wish to force this on others just stating my beliefs as uncontroversially as possible
#4. Posted:
Jeeves
  • 1000 Thanks
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 06, 201211Year Member
Posts: 6,360
Reputation Power: 374
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 06, 201211Year Member
Posts: 6,360
Reputation Power: 374
Super Mario is also in my mind.

This is one of the most incoherent arguments for Gods existence I have ever read, or it's late and i'm not understanding what you're insinuating.

Please correct me if i'm wrong, but are you stating that because something exists within your mind it exists within reality?
#5. Posted:
Moz
  • TTG Addict
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 06, 201112Year Member
Posts: 2,837
Reputation Power: 132
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 06, 201112Year Member
Posts: 2,837
Reputation Power: 132
Worst
Argument
Ever

Give
UP
#6. Posted:
InfinityWardrobe
  • Powerhouse
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 25, 201113Year Member
Posts: 412
Reputation Power: 16
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 25, 201113Year Member
Posts: 412
Reputation Power: 16
Higuain wrote What a load of ****.

You're using rhetorical questions to seem like you're correct.

It is CLEAR that evolution is the answer, if you think otherwise, Sure, go for it, But you're an idiot.


Excuse me but can i ask what sort of idiot am I? It seems that you are more the idiot for challenging peoples BELIEFS. You believe in evolution, my opinion on evolution is not shared with you but doesnt mean i am stupid for thinking otherwise. If you are going to be so blunt about your beliefs then dont share them around because i dont need to believe what you do because im entitled to an opinion.
#7. Posted:
Moz
  • TTG Addict
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 06, 201112Year Member
Posts: 2,837
Reputation Power: 132
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 06, 201112Year Member
Posts: 2,837
Reputation Power: 132
InfinityWardrobe wrote
Higuain wrote What a load of ****.

You're using rhetorical questions to seem like you're correct.

It is CLEAR that evolution is the answer, if you think otherwise, Sure, go for it, But you're an idiot.


Excuse me but can i ask what sort of idiot am I? It seems that you are more the idiot for challenging peoples BELIEFS. You believe in evolution, my opinion on evolution is not shared with you but doesnt mean i am stupid for thinking otherwise. If you are going to be so blunt about your beliefs then dont share them around because i dont need to believe what you do because im entitled to an opinion.



And there you have it....

A belief is an opinion
#8. Posted:
expldodingadrian
  • New Member
Status: Offline
Joined: May 28, 201112Year Member
Posts: 30
Reputation Power: 1
Status: Offline
Joined: May 28, 201112Year Member
Posts: 30
Reputation Power: 1
Your points are stupid.

point 1:

if your religious you believe in something that you have no proof bbut yet you still decide to believe in it because it's easy to believe in. althoug if you're an athiest, you more than likely believe in science. sciencie although it doesn't answer everything, it is based off things that would be logical and can be supported, while religion you have no proof whatsoever.

point 2:
get an item of normal food in the kitchen (normal food represents athieism) and put it in your right hand. now imagine you have an item of food of your left hand that you love. you'd prefer the imaginary (imaginary food represents religion) item in your left hand because you like the item more. although, the item on your left hand isn't as good, it's edible because its a real object and therefore will actually serve a purpose to the person eating it.

your points don't prove sh*t. sorry...
#9. Posted:
InfinityWardrobe
  • Powerhouse
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 25, 201113Year Member
Posts: 412
Reputation Power: 16
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 25, 201113Year Member
Posts: 412
Reputation Power: 16
Jinx wrote Super Mario is also in my mind.

This is one of the most incoherent arguments for Gods existence I have ever read, or it's late and i'm not understanding what you're insinuating.

Please correct me if i'm wrong, but are you stating that because something exists within your mind it exists within reality?


Super Mario need not be the greatest thing in existence so it doesnt need to hold the quality of existence. By God being the Greatest idea of the universe it must hold the quality of Existence. There are more powerful things than Mario but not more powerful things than God
#10. Posted:
Synybun
  • Gold Gifter
Status: Offline
Joined: May 03, 201211Year Member
Posts: 4,378
Reputation Power: 156
Status: Offline
Joined: May 03, 201211Year Member
Posts: 4,378
Reputation Power: 156
These arguments hardly even support any logical facts, just random questions that you support an opinion based answer for.
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.