You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#21. Posted:
G_Man
  • Rated Awesome
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 24, 201014Year Member
Posts: 5,367
Reputation Power: 547
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 24, 201014Year Member
Posts: 5,367
Reputation Power: 547
Reelthrill1 wrote Has no one even considered my notion at the top of this page which would allow the section to stay intact while reducing the spam and keeping the member base relatively the same?
as good an idea it is, that would mean even more work for the moderators at the end of the day and like i said before they have their hands full in that section alone as it is..
#22. Posted:
Na_Palm
  • TTG Warrior
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 27, 201014Year Member
Posts: 9,760
Reputation Power: 0
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 27, 201014Year Member
Posts: 9,760
Reputation Power: 0
yes by far way to much spam that is why i dont go in them =]
#23. Posted:
Zondrina
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 02, 201013Year Member
Posts: 1,415
Reputation Power: 143
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 02, 201013Year Member
Posts: 1,415
Reputation Power: 143
Perhaps. Although the simple solution to that is to create a larger rule enforcement base. Which would obviously mean the staff would have to loosen up abit allowing some new long time members of the website to become moderators.
#24. Posted:
Canning87
  • TTG Commander
Status: Offline
Joined: May 17, 201013Year Member
Posts: 6,839
Reputation Power: 311
Status: Offline
Joined: May 17, 201013Year Member
Posts: 6,839
Reputation Power: 311
hey dude great post


i posted in the suggestion box a while back that we should get rid of the 10th section except for the sticky's
#25. Posted:
xKryptic
  • Retired Staff
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 24, 200914Year Member
Posts: 11,066
Reputation Power: 1528
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 24, 200914Year Member
Posts: 11,066
Reputation Power: 1528
Sadly they have been like that since day one, they just keep getting worse *Sigh*
#26. Posted:
G_Man
  • Retired Staff
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 24, 201014Year Member
Posts: 5,367
Reputation Power: 547
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 24, 201014Year Member
Posts: 5,367
Reputation Power: 547
Reelthrill1 wrote Perhaps. Although the simple solution to that is to create a larger rule enforcement base. Which would obviously mean the staff would have to loosen up abit allowing some new long time members of the website to become moderators.

perhaps allowing them to become moderators for that particular section rather than a global moderator? Sounds like an idea to me but probaly no chance of it happening
#27. Posted:
Zondrina
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 02, 201013Year Member
Posts: 1,415
Reputation Power: 143
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 02, 201013Year Member
Posts: 1,415
Reputation Power: 143
We can all chitter chatter about it, but the end result is up to the staff and the communities ability to respect the decision of it.

Although ive been considering that removing the unverified section idea you pitched. Perhaps create an entire seperate unverified section. It would be much easier to mod, and they could designate a FEW people im sure to watch over it.
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.