Rainbow Six Siege Confirmed To Have No Single-Player Story

4.7
What is it with modern-day shooters going down the ‘no story’ route?

Titanfall, Evolve, Star Wars Battlefront – now Ubisoft’s latest franchise-resurrecting Rainbow Six has just confirmed it’ll be running with a heavy focus on essentially being multiplayer-only. Sure you have access to offline and ‘single player content’ in the form of maps filled with bots, but unlike the cancelled R6: Patriots that looked to be delivering a sold story, Siege will have no such thing.

Speaking at EGX 2015, Scott Mitchell, Art Director mentioned,

“There is no story mode per se. You go through training, where you get to experience different operators and their devices. You can play against enemy AI in co-op through all the maps. You can customise matches, so that’s what we’re offering on the single-player side of things”
adding,

“It’s a pretty good training ground, and on top or that you’re unlocking the same content as you would playing in PvP. You’re still gaining stars, reknown points, and new operatives”

Immediately for many fans of Rainbow Six’s older games, this will be a killing blow. It’s all well and good offering up a bevy of maps (11 so far, to be exact) that’ll be downloadable for free going forward, but anyone not up for getting stuck into the online portion of things will be thoroughly put off that the dedicated single player part of the experience is essentially just a training ground.
Rainbow Six Siege is scheduled for release December 1st, 2015.



Posted:
Related Forum: Gaming Discussion

Comments

"Rainbow Six Siege Confirmed To Have No Single-Player Story" :: Login/Create an Account :: 59 comments

If you would like to post a comment please signin to your account or register for an account.

LiaPosted:

I think this game would be amazing if it had a singleplayer right now its an good.

TiffxnyPosted:

Qwel
Miss I don't understand why companies are going down that route, campaigns are what make games great.


Because they know people will buy the game even at full 60 JUST for multiplayer.. Its really sad and true people will still go out and buy this game, and the season pass for whatever and all the camos that will cost like 3 dollars each and all the whatever.. Im not having this, im about to leave to take my pre order off at gamestop.


We should boycott rainbow six; BS

DevilPosted:

I expected this all the way. I would rather have a solid multiplayer with no SP rather than a mediocre multiplayer with a SP

TheRealMarkPosted:

Miss I don't understand why companies are going down that route, campaigns are what make games great.


I agree with you on that one.

Mario350Posted:

multiplayer was first story was second to bad that renamed the other ranbow six/cancelled it to do this game rss is good but no story im pretty sure they said they will do story but that was along time ago now they announced no story well thats good cause fps games with story mode made no sense
but rainbow six games had the best fps story

UnfortunatePosted:

Damnnnnn, it needs a single player, it looks sick.

ehPosted:

Miss I don't understand why companies are going down that route, campaigns are what make games great.


Because they know people will buy the game even at full 60 JUST for multiplayer.. Its really sad and true people will still go out and buy this game, and the season pass for whatever and all the camos that will cost like 3 dollars each and all the whatever.. Im not having this, im about to leave to take my pre order off at gamestop.

MissPosted:

I don't understand why companies are going down that route, campaigns are what make games great.

SkyPosted:

there should be a single-player in this game !!

CraigPosted:

MP on these game bore the shit out of me.


Very disappointed!