US government 'stopping' Microsoft from discussing NSA scandal

4.7
Microsoft has sternly denied recent allegations that it offered US intelligence agencies unrestricted access to customer data.

The firm's general counsel & exec VP of corporate affairs Brad Smith said in a statement today that the reports contained "significant inaccuracies" in their interpretation of allegedly leaked government documents, but that US government lawyers have denied it permission to address the claims candidly.

"Today we have asked the Attorney General of the United States to personally take action to permit Microsoft and other companies to share publicly more complete information about how we handle national security requests for customer information," said Smith.

"We believe the U.S. Constitution guarantees our freedom to share more information with the public, yet the Government is stopping us," he added, saying the government is yet to respond to requests filed June 19 for permission to discuss the "volume of national security requests we have received".

He went on, "There are significant inaccuracies in the interpretations of leaked government documents reported in the media last week. We have asked the Government again for permission to discuss the issues raised by these new documents, and our request was denied by government lawyers."

The most recent in a string of related reports claimed that Microsoft has over the past three years allowed the NSA to gain unrestricted access to Outlook emails, Skype video calls and SkyDrive data as part of a secret US government intelligence initiative called Prism.

Smith categorically denies such activity.

"Microsoft does not provide any government with direct and unfettered access to our customer's data. Microsoft only pulls and then provides the specific data mandated by the relevant legal demand," he said.

"If a government wants customer data - including for national security purposes - it needs to follow applicable legal process, meaning it must serve us with a court order for content or subpoena for account information.

"We only respond to requests for specific accounts and identifiers. There is no blanket or indiscriminate access to Microsoft's customer data. The aggregate data we have been able to publish shows clearly that only a tiny fraction - fractions of a percent - of our customers have ever been subject to a government demand related to criminal law or national security," he went on.

Such requests, however, have become more frequent in recent times, indicates Smith.

Speaking specifically on its cloud data storage service SkyDrive, Smith revealed, "In 2013 we made changes to our processes to be able to continue to comply with an increasing number of legal demands governments worldwide."

He went on to clarify, "None of these changes provided any government with direct access to SkyDrive. Nor did any of them change the fact that we still require governments to follow legal processes when requesting customer data."

Posted:
Related Forum: PC General Forum

Source: http://www.computerandvideogames.com/419362/us-government-stopping-microsoft-from-discussing-nsa-scandal/

Comments

"US government 'stopping' Microsoft from discussing NSA scandal" :: Login/Create an Account :: 66 comments

If you would like to post a comment please signin to your account or register for an account.

thecelloman16Posted:

Yin
RATF i mean why do companies want your personal info?????


It's the NSA that wants your personal info. That is a department within the US government. They use the excuse 'to prevent terrorist attacks' to justify this unconstitutional act. Not saying this doesn't stop anything ever, but it's the point that we are giving away freedom for a temporary comfort and security. Terrorist attacks are a rare thing within the United States. Even then, they will still occur if the guys know what they are doing. That being said, where is the security? They can't stop all attacks, so why must our freedom that was given to us by the Constitution be taken away from something they will never truly defeat? If we had problems like the Middle East or something along those lines, then this could be somewhat justified (or at least have a somewhat valid argument.) Since we are nothing like the Middle East in terms of mass bombings and the like, this is an injustice.


Exactly, if we were having several bombings a day in major cities and nearly 100 people died from those each day then it would be justified.

thecelloman16Posted:

RATF
RATF
-CP This whole NSA scandal sounds like the Prison Break storyline....


lol i just thought of that


so i am guessing that every company stores profiles of you?


They sort of do that. They keep a profile of you on Facebook servers, Xbox Live servers, pretty much anything on the internet has a profile of you and what you have done on those servers.

thecelloman16Posted:

Confidential doesn't mean Top Secret. So release several confidential Government files. It is just a loophole in the laws pertaining to Top Secret files in the Government or Military.

CokesPosted:

Yin
xCeeTee People's surprised? Don't break the law and nothing bad will happen to you, simples.


How about the government not break the Constitution and only search through the people's private messages if they are found of doing something wrong or suspicious. Simples.


But if it's about public safety it's a different thing.

LEFT4DUTYPosted:

yo Mohammed get on xbox were having a Skype meaning for the next terrorist attack im so hyped

RuinsPosted:

i swear they started doing this after the 9/11? i think? or it has been stepped up since then

gmlukensPosted:

This just isnt right

RuinsPosted:

xCeeTee People's surprised? Don't break the law and nothing bad will happen to you, simples.


i don't understand though? i mean they say "we are doing this to prevent terrorist attacks" but why would a terrorist discuss what his plan is over a social media website and/or console?? unless they are stupid?

YinPosted:

xCeeTee People's surprised? Don't break the law and nothing bad will happen to you, simples.


How about the government not break the Constitution and only search through the people's private messages if they are found of doing something wrong or suspicious. Simples.

StonerzardPosted:

People's surprised? Don't break the law and nothing bad will happen to you, simples.