Battlefield 4 to be revealed on March 26th

4.7
EA has provided invitations to the reveal of Battlefield 4 at the 2013 Game Developers Conference, which will take place in San Francisco from March 25th through 29th. The event will begin immediately after this year’s PAX East, where Blizzard and Capcom have also teased new announcements.

The invitation shows a similar color and font palette, indicating that Battlefield 4 may be a direct sequel to Battlefield 3.

For now, no details have been confirmed, but look out for more info at the end of this month once the event has taken place.

Invitiation


Posted:
Related Forum: Gaming Discussion

Comments

"Battlefield 4 to be revealed on March 26th" :: Login/Create an Account :: 345 comments

If you would like to post a comment please signin to your account or register for an account.

RobShepherdFTWPosted:

Now this reveal I can not wait for.

KenjishuPosted:

Cant wait for this i hope its as good as it predecessors

CowOGPosted:

Gossip I dont see whats so good about this game...


Really? You deserve a SMACK in the face!

TagsPosted:

Applejack- I'm getting Bioshock instead :)


You should get both. :)

GossipPosted:

I dont see whats so good about this game...

Applejack-Posted:

I'm getting Bioshock instead :)

OdinPosted:

shadow1
Ero
shadow1
Ero
shadow1 I disliked bf3. Alot of it didnt seem right to me. I also hate how they just sold out with the ability to have all unlocks at level one. But i will sht my pants if they reveal that it is actually Battlefield:Bad company 3 because we need another one of those.


The only battlefield i played was 3 so i like it.


Well the big difference i would have to say is destruction. Bf3 had no destruction at all really while in the bad company series, you can level a whole entire playing field with little to no cover. And i cant leave out how there was a campaign in both bad companies unlike the graphics and vehicle tour bf3 had.


Yea but battle field 3 is beast.


I cant say i had fun on a few maps like metro conquest, but that was really it. If you think bf3 was beast, i want you to go try out bc2.


bf3 was trash compared to it's predecessors.

ChugJugPosted:

I can't wait

shadow1Posted:

Ero
shadow1
Ero
shadow1 I disliked bf3. Alot of it didnt seem right to me. I also hate how they just sold out with the ability to have all unlocks at level one. But i will sht my pants if they reveal that it is actually Battlefield:Bad company 3 because we need another one of those.


The only battlefield i played was 3 so i like it.


Well the big difference i would have to say is destruction. Bf3 had no destruction at all really while in the bad company series, you can level a whole entire playing field with little to no cover. And i cant leave out how there was a campaign in both bad companies unlike the graphics and vehicle tour bf3 had.


Yea but battle field 3 is beast.


I cant say i had fun on a few maps like metro conquest, but that was really it. If you think bf3 was beast, i want you to go try out bc2.

Twist-Version-7Posted:

Loved the third one, can't wait for this.