Less destructible environments in battlefield 3? Dice explains

4.5
Destruction has become a huge part of the Battlefield franchise. It was first introduced in Battlefield: Bad Company and has since then, become a staple part of the franchise. In an interview with IGN, Karl-Magnus Troedsson, General Manager at DICE, revealed that destruction was not originally intended to be a main part of the series. “When we threw in destruction, with having more dynamic environments in there, it actually worked out pretty well by itself.” He continued, “the destruction didn’t really rupture the whole Battlefield system. It actually was just a nice-add on…”

Many fans would agree that it was a very welcome addition in Battlefield: Bad Company 1, which was later improved in Bad Company 2. However, it has introduced other un-anticipated problems along with it as well. For instance, ”there were some maps that actually, after a while, if you played very long in the same area, you’d just grind down everything to the bottom, which made it really hard sometimes for, like, the defenders in a rush map,” said Troedsson himself. ”When we see these things, [we think] okay, we have to add some covers that actually are not destructible.”

In recent trailers and interviews, it’s been revealed that there won’t be as many completely destructible buildings like there were in Bad Company 2, however, destruction will still play a large role. Though you won’t be able to drop buildings on enemy’s heads in BF3, you will still be able to kill them with falling debris from destroyed walls or structures. Alan Kertz, senior gameplay designer at DICE, shed some more light on this subject when asked whether the player who caused the debris gets credit for the kill or not. He simply replied, “credit is given where credit is due.”

If you played the multiplayer in the 2010 reboot of Medal of Honor, you will notice that DICE did not include any destruction at all. So far, we’ve seen a few things from MoH carry over into Battlefield 3 and now, perhaps, we will see less destructible environments as well.

http://mp1st.com/2011/09/05/less-destructible-environments-in-battlefield-3-dice-explains/

Posted:

Comments

"Less destructible environments in battlefield 3? Dice explains" :: Login/Create an Account :: 63 comments

If you would like to post a comment please signin to your account or register for an account.

Thy_BlugoonPosted:

M16xDr0pSh0tz **** medal of honor its sucks why would they get ideas based off that piece of ****
AGREED

atomiczx2Posted:

Why would anyone buy this game in the 1st place? BF1 BF2 were so boring and useless.

M16xDr0pSh0tzPosted:

**** medal of honor its sucks why would they get ideas based off that piece of shit

System32Posted:

Klutchizz
I_MAKE_IT_RAIN Hahahaha im not buying battlefield 3 at all. MW3 FTW


Fanboy, if you weren't 12 years old you would realize both games are going to be great and you wouldn't be trolling. shut up please :D


Battlefield will be great on PC, that's true :)

On console... idk

KlutchizzPosted:

I_MAKE_IT_RAIN Hahahaha im not buying battlefield 3 at all. MW3 FTW


Fanboy, if you weren't 12 years old you would realize both games are going to be great and you wouldn't be trolling. shut up please :D

ZerkosPosted:

I_MAKE_IT_RAIN Hahahaha im not buying battlefield 3 at all. MW3 FTW
Oh yes because mw3 has destruction.

ImmortalTechniquePosted:

does not really matter still going to be an amazing game

BF3Posted:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eBLOOjoE1Kk

The destruction in the Alpha was limited but yet it was still like in that video.

It will still be great.

Connor-_-Posted:

sadface :(
best part about the game imo

I_MAKE_IT_RAINPosted:

Hahahaha im not buying battlefield 3 at all. MW3 FTW