#551. Posted:
SuperFrank
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 28, 201013Year Member
Posts: 1,923
Reputation Power: 94
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 28, 201013Year Member
Posts: 1,923
Reputation Power: 94
Feels wrote

Original joke is original...

Yeah of course it's your opinion, I'm just arguing the point.


Yeh mate.... Original joke is original

I give up arguing the point, because to you Arsenal are the best team in history and all there players are gods.
#552. Posted:
SuperFrank
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 28, 201013Year Member
Posts: 1,923
Reputation Power: 94
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 28, 201013Year Member
Posts: 1,923
Reputation Power: 94
invalidslinky wrote
-LizardLick wrote
invalidslinky wrote
-LizardLick wrote
Feels wrote
-LizardLick wrote 4-2-3-1

Hart
Walker Jagielka Cahill Cole
Wilshere Gerrard
Townsend Rooney Welbeck
Sturridge


Welbeck!? WELBECK!? Dafuq... You would have Townsend over Walcott and Welbeck over Lallana?


Welbeck plays well for a England, although he has a poor recored at club level he does but a good shift in and links up well.

All Walcott can do is run. Nothing else, Townsend can get past players not forgetting he actually has a final product.

All he can do is run eh?



What does this prove? His all round finishing is terrible hahahaha and if you can't agree on that then you clearly have no meaning like most your other posts.
Goes through 4 players there.

Finishing is bad eh?

Your just using his best career highlights, youtube makes Heskey look good.
#553. Posted:
invalidslinky
  • Wise One
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 17, 201013Year Member
Posts: 565
Reputation Power: 19
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 17, 201013Year Member
Posts: 565
Reputation Power: 19
-LizardLick wrote
Feels wrote

Original joke is original...

Yeah of course it's your opinion, I'm just arguing the point.


Yeh mate.... Original joke is original

I give up arguing the point, because to you Arsenal are the best team in history and all there players are gods.

But we are the best team in history. Did Chelsea go undefeated? Did ManU and City go undefeated?
#554. Posted:
BigRedMachine
  • TTG Contender
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 21, 201310Year Member
Posts: 3,085
Reputation Power: 125
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 21, 201310Year Member
Posts: 3,085
Reputation Power: 125
Not as bad as I thought it was going to be tonight, played better in the 2nd half, we just didn't get onto the chances we had.
#555. Posted:
SuperFrank
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 28, 201013Year Member
Posts: 1,923
Reputation Power: 94
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 28, 201013Year Member
Posts: 1,923
Reputation Power: 94
Feels wrote
invalidslinky wrote
-LizardLick wrote
invalidslinky wrote
-LizardLick wrote
Feels wrote
-LizardLick wrote 4-2-3-1

Hart
Walker Jagielka Cahill Cole
Wilshere Gerrard
Townsend Rooney Welbeck
Sturridge


Welbeck!? WELBECK!? Dafuq... You would have Townsend over Walcott and Welbeck over Lallana?


Welbeck plays well for a England, although he has a poor recored at club level he does but a good shift in and links up well.

All Walcott can do is run. Nothing else, Townsend can get past players not forgetting he actually has a final product.

All he can do is run eh?



What does this prove? His all round finishing is terrible hahahaha and if you can't agree on that then you clearly have no meaning like most your other posts.
Goes through 4 players there.

Finishing is bad eh?


Yeah, he just can't accept that Walcott is a decent player because he plays for Arsenal.

Fact of the matter is, he scored more goals in the Premier League last season than all of Chelsea's attacking players. He can't be that bad, eh? ;)

Yeh Torres scored more...... Proves a lot.


Statistically Walcott is better but Townsend it's playing his 1st proper season at Spurs and that all your using standing on, individually Townsend is all round better. The fact is Walcott has been at Arsenal for the last 7 years and has always played with a great team while Townsend hasn't settled yet.
#556. Posted:
SuperFrank
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 28, 201013Year Member
Posts: 1,923
Reputation Power: 94
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 28, 201013Year Member
Posts: 1,923
Reputation Power: 94
invalidslinky wrote
-LizardLick wrote
Feels wrote

Original joke is original...

Yeah of course it's your opinion, I'm just arguing the point.


Yeh mate.... Original joke is original

I give up arguing the point, because to you Arsenal are the best team in history and all there players are gods.

But we are the best team in history. Did Chelsea go undefeated? Did ManU and City go undefeated?



Do you even watch football lmao?! Such an idiot

Soz you've won the champions league.
#557. Posted:
BigRedMachine
  • TTG Contender
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 21, 201310Year Member
Posts: 3,085
Reputation Power: 125
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 21, 201310Year Member
Posts: 3,085
Reputation Power: 125
invalidslinky wrote
-LizardLick wrote
Feels wrote

Original joke is original...

Yeah of course it's your opinion, I'm just arguing the point.


Yeh mate.... Original joke is original

I give up arguing the point, because to you Arsenal are the best team in history and all there players are gods.

But we are the best team in history. Did Chelsea go undefeated? Did ManU and City go undefeated?


How does going undefeated the whole season mean you are the best team in history?
#558. Posted:
SuperFrank
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 28, 201013Year Member
Posts: 1,923
Reputation Power: 94
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 28, 201013Year Member
Posts: 1,923
Reputation Power: 94
Gotta_Have_It wrote
invalidslinky wrote
-LizardLick wrote
Feels wrote

Original joke is original...

Yeah of course it's your opinion, I'm just arguing the point.


Yeh mate.... Original joke is original

I give up arguing the point, because to you Arsenal are the best team in history and all there players are gods.

But we are the best team in history. Did Chelsea go undefeated? Did ManU and City go undefeated?


How does going undefeated the whole season mean you are the best team in history?


I thought he was being sarcastic, then he down-voted you,

How deluded.
#559. Posted:
SuperFrank
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 28, 201013Year Member
Posts: 1,923
Reputation Power: 94
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 28, 201013Year Member
Posts: 1,923
Reputation Power: 94
Feels wrote That Invincibles team was one of the best in history. We're nowhere near that level anymore, though.

Anyway, I think it's actually ridiculous how you can judge Townsend (who as you said, has only had one real chance in the Spurs line up) is better than Walcott. How can you judge a player on 10 games? Bloody ridiculous.

Don't question anyone else's knowledge on football when yours doesn't seem that up-to-scratch either bud.

Have you even read what I've put,

'Who would you rather have in your England team'
Townsend, nah Walcott is this and that, I would still rather have Townsend.

Up to scratch? Lmfao I couldn't care what you think, Yours isn't either, anything against Arsenal is wrong.
#560. Posted:
SuperFrank
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 28, 201013Year Member
Posts: 1,923
Reputation Power: 94
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 28, 201013Year Member
Posts: 1,923
Reputation Power: 94
Feels wrote
-LizardLick wrote
Feels wrote That Invincibles team was one of the best in history. We're nowhere near that level anymore, though.

Anyway, I think it's actually ridiculous how you can judge Townsend (who as you said, has only had one real chance in the Spurs line up) is better than Walcott. How can you judge a player on 10 games? Bloody ridiculous.

Don't question anyone else's knowledge on football when yours doesn't seem that up-to-scratch either bud.

Have you even read what I've put,

'Who would you rather have in your England team'
Townsend, nah Walcott is this and that, I would still rather have Townsend.

Up to scratch? Lmfao I couldn't care what you think, Yours isn't either, anything against Arsenal is wrong.


Loooool, once again with the biased comments. Getting a tiny bit old now bud, try and think of something new.
Also, I said it's your opinion, that's cool. I then proceeded to ask you why you would rather have Townsend, and that's where this debate stemmed from.

I can guarantee Brad and OhDavidLuiz will come along soon backing you, just because they're Chelsea fans too. I'd bet so much money that if you weren't a Chelsea fan, they'd probably disagree with everything you've been saying.

I'm simply just stating you are biased, and you've got your little friend invalid slinky sticking up for you, unfortunately for you he's nearly as deluded as you.


What's Townsend or anything I've said tonight go anything to do with Chelsea or Brad/DavidLuiz haha?


Last edited by SuperFrank ; edited 1 time in total
Users browsing this topic: None
Jump to:


RECENT POSTS

HOT TOPICS