You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
you know whats funny
Posted:

you know whats funnyPosted:

CuBaNzInCHaRG3
  • TTG Fanatic
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 28, 200914Year Member
Posts: 4,326
Reputation Power: 157
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 28, 200914Year Member
Posts: 4,326
Reputation Power: 157
all the new staff i dont think we need 20 section mods
#2. Posted:
iTz_ThaModsHacks
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 21, 201013Year Member
Posts: 1,279
Reputation Power: 55
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 21, 201013Year Member
Posts: 1,279
Reputation Power: 55
Okay? Its Their Decision Not Yours
#3. Posted:
-Farmers-
  • Powerhouse
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 01, 201013Year Member
Posts: 441
Reputation Power: 19
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 01, 201013Year Member
Posts: 441
Reputation Power: 19
iTz_ThaModsHacks wrote Okay? Its Their Decision Not Yours



i agree TTG decision not ares
#4. Posted:
Trillecks
  • Junior Member
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 27, 201113Year Member
Posts: 81
Reputation Power: 4
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 27, 201113Year Member
Posts: 81
Reputation Power: 4
Some might agree, and some might disagree.

But, it's not a democracy, it's up to the owners or higher powered members of the site to decide.

However, just from my own viewpoint... even with this excess amount of staff on hand, it seems like many reported (and some non-reported) posts go unattended to.

It's a shame.
#5. Posted:
Sophisticated
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 28, 201013Year Member
Posts: 1,390
Reputation Power: 62
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 28, 201013Year Member
Posts: 1,390
Reputation Power: 62
CuBaNzInCHaRG3 wrote all the new staff i dont think we need 20 section mods
why would we not? the more the better
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.