Forest wrote So you're telling me, that the government thought out and went through with mass shootings just to scare the population. They actually agreed that killing children was a necessity, and that good would come of it.

Population and gun control

Renzel wrote

Forest wrote So you're telling me, that the government thought out and went through with mass shootings just to scare the population. They actually agreed that killing children was a necessity, and that good would come of it.

Population and gun control

You must understand how vague you are being. Which political party are you talking about?
You understand that after every single mass shooting in memorable US history gun sales across the nation have gone up?

You would think that 'The Government' would have got the message after the third or fourth mass shooting that the majority of the US population couldn't give a flying mcnugget about gun reform.

And population control? Since 1984 the total amount of people killed in mass shootings in the US is 218.
10,829 people are born daily in the US.
That means that if the average mass shooting lasted for an hour, 451 people would be born while it was being carried out.
Using mass shootings for population control is like using a broken fingernail to fill your bath.

I absolutely agree. Look into the news a little further, even though we have hundreds of news sources on TV, they're owned by just a few parent companies which (surprise) have government ties.

Look at a lot of the bad things such as 9/11, why is the government covering facts up? Also notice that as soon as a cop gets shot or a mass murder happens, what does the government do? Do they reach out to the family members offering support (moral and / or financial)? Or do they push the agenda that we need to ban guns?

The government was created for citizen protection, without a government, there would be no control and no control mean chaos, they keep these gun laws for a reason, there's too much violence now a days and it's becoming an epidemic, especially in the u.s. And no i don't think these shootings were "setups", they were REAL shootings that involved REAL PEOPLE and REAL FAMILIES, do you really think the government would set up such chaos when their prime objective is to prevent chaos?

Renzel wrote trying to take away our right to bear arms.

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

First of all if the government wanted to take away your guns, they are doing a terrible job because gun sales actually went up during Obama's term. So in result, our government actually made people want to buy more guns. (btw I do support the 2nd amendment).

I think they are all false flags done in order to instill fear in the American public