You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
Gun Control | BS Government
Posted:
Gun Control | BS GovernmentPosted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 27, 20159Year Member
Posts: 72
Reputation Power: 4
First off, I wanna say I'm a believer in God, I believe in the truth, and I believe the government is a bunch of bullshit people trying to take away our right to bear arms.
Personally, I believe the government has been attempting for a long time to take away our guns for dominance over the people. Also I believe that MOST (not all) mass shootings documented by major news channels are setups just so they can use that as an example to take away our guns.
Example: The Orlando shooting was on every single news channel in the country. There was also 2 other shootings in Oakland and Chicago, but they're not as heavily documented as the Orlando shooting. What makes the Orlando shooting different then the other 2 shootings? Why isn't the Chicago and Oakland shootings not as popular as the Orlando one? Like I said, the major shootings are setups by the government and the ones nobody knows about, I believe are the actual legit shootings.
I'm not saying that the major shootings like Sandy Hook (complete bs btw) and the Orlando one are 100% fake, but if you look at the facts presented by the news, it doesn't make sense at all. I saw this one video of this guy saying that there was another person keeping the doors shut so nobody can get out and as soon as the person said that, he got cut off. Also people are saying that the number of rounds he had, the amount of people he killed, the time it takes for him to reload that type of gun doesn't make sense. Just a bunch of coverups and lies.
The news is complete bullshit that are ran by higher ups so they can brainwash people.
What do you guys think?
RIP to the victims.
Personally, I believe the government has been attempting for a long time to take away our guns for dominance over the people. Also I believe that MOST (not all) mass shootings documented by major news channels are setups just so they can use that as an example to take away our guns.
Example: The Orlando shooting was on every single news channel in the country. There was also 2 other shootings in Oakland and Chicago, but they're not as heavily documented as the Orlando shooting. What makes the Orlando shooting different then the other 2 shootings? Why isn't the Chicago and Oakland shootings not as popular as the Orlando one? Like I said, the major shootings are setups by the government and the ones nobody knows about, I believe are the actual legit shootings.
I'm not saying that the major shootings like Sandy Hook (complete bs btw) and the Orlando one are 100% fake, but if you look at the facts presented by the news, it doesn't make sense at all. I saw this one video of this guy saying that there was another person keeping the doors shut so nobody can get out and as soon as the person said that, he got cut off. Also people are saying that the number of rounds he had, the amount of people he killed, the time it takes for him to reload that type of gun doesn't make sense. Just a bunch of coverups and lies.
The news is complete bullshit that are ran by higher ups so they can brainwash people.
What do you guys think?
RIP to the victims.
#2. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 08, 201310Year Member
Posts: 1,728
Reputation Power: 137
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 08, 201310Year Member
Posts: 1,728
Reputation Power: 137
The USA doesn't need to take away your guns. A couple of tanks could take down any city in the whole of America, or they could just take all the important political people onto a "business trip" and mysteriously a terrible accident detonates a bunch of nukes and wipes out the country. If the government wanted to wipe out the USA, it wouldn't be too difficult.
I do believe that ISIS and what not are just setup though. There's always a scheme going on to reduce the world population, either it's car accidents (which could easily be avoided if they fitted chips into cars and capped the car at a certain speed limit when it went past a speed limit sign and it remained until the driver reached another sign) or it's wars (which are completely unnecessary and could easily be fought using machines/drones and not a single soldier would be needed). There's always something happening in the news and it's normally to do with population control in some form. They should just make fair laws with ridiculously high penalties, that way the criminals would be killed instead of soldiers and innocent people.
I do believe that ISIS and what not are just setup though. There's always a scheme going on to reduce the world population, either it's car accidents (which could easily be avoided if they fitted chips into cars and capped the car at a certain speed limit when it went past a speed limit sign and it remained until the driver reached another sign) or it's wars (which are completely unnecessary and could easily be fought using machines/drones and not a single soldier would be needed). There's always something happening in the news and it's normally to do with population control in some form. They should just make fair laws with ridiculously high penalties, that way the criminals would be killed instead of soldiers and innocent people.
- 2useful
- 2not useful
#3. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 15, 201112Year Member
Posts: 824
Reputation Power: 31
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 15, 201112Year Member
Posts: 824
Reputation Power: 31
"First off, I wanna say I'm a believer in God, I believe in the truth"
Disqualifies everything else in the sh*tpost.
Disqualifies everything else in the sh*tpost.
- 0useful
- 7not useful
#4. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 28, 201211Year Member
Posts: 1,294
Reputation Power: 238
Dude, people actually died. Families lost their kids. It is so far wrong to say it was faked by the government. Like, you actually have to be simple to think that. Did you spray deodorant into your lungs when you were younger?
You can get guns too easily in american, end of story. It is too late to ban them completely but there needs to be an overhaul of the system. Look at any other 1st world country and compare the mass shootings and gun laws and tell me guns aren't a problem.
Of course the news are gonna be a bit wrong. they are scrambling for the news so they can be the first one to present it. There was a shooting near where my mum works in australia (some guy with a knife was shot by police) and the story she heard from bystanders and friends (who were right there) is completely different to what the news said. Its usually the bystander giving incorrect information due to shock or what they thought they saw.
You can get guns too easily in american, end of story. It is too late to ban them completely but there needs to be an overhaul of the system. Look at any other 1st world country and compare the mass shootings and gun laws and tell me guns aren't a problem.
Of course the news are gonna be a bit wrong. they are scrambling for the news so they can be the first one to present it. There was a shooting near where my mum works in australia (some guy with a knife was shot by police) and the story she heard from bystanders and friends (who were right there) is completely different to what the news said. Its usually the bystander giving incorrect information due to shock or what they thought they saw.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#5. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 07, 201211Year Member
Posts: 722
Reputation Power: 35
Renzel wrote First off, I wanna say I'm a believer in God, I believe in the truth, and I believe the government is a bunch of bullshit people trying to take away our right to bear arms.
Personally, I believe the government has been attempting for a long time to take away our guns for dominance over the people. Also I believe that MOST (not all) mass shootings documented by major news channels are setups just so they can use that as an example to take away our guns.
Example: The Orlando shooting was on every single news channel in the country. There was also 2 other shootings in Oakland and Chicago, but they're not as heavily documented as the Orlando shooting. What makes the Orlando shooting different then the other 2 shootings? Why isn't the Chicago and Oakland shootings not as popular as the Orlando one? Like I said, the major shootings are setups by the government and the ones nobody knows about, I believe are the actual legit shootings.
I'm not saying that the major shootings like Sandy Hook (complete bs btw) and the Orlando one are 100% fake, but if you look at the facts presented by the news, it doesn't make sense at all. I saw this one video of this guy saying that there was another person keeping the doors shut so nobody can get out and as soon as the person said that, he got cut off. Also people are saying that the number of rounds he had, the amount of people he killed, the time it takes for him to reload that type of gun doesn't make sense. Just a bunch of coverups and lies.
The news is complete bullshit that are ran by higher ups so they can brainwash people.
What do you guys think?
RIP to the victims.
ah another person who can see the true colors of the government
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#6. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 28, 201310Year Member
Posts: 1,059
Reputation Power: 59
GiveMeRep4free wrote Dude, people actually died. Families lost their kids. It is so far wrong to say it was faked by the government.
If the government wanted to take control of the people, they wouldn't care who dies, They want power by any means necessary. Its the same reason people believe 9/11 was faked.
But that doesn't mean I think Orlando was a setup, just saying it's possible.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#7. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 13, 200914Year Member
Posts: 7,815
Reputation Power: 3052
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 13, 200914Year Member
Posts: 7,815
Reputation Power: 3052
So you're telling me, that the government thought out and went through with mass shootings just to scare the population. They actually agreed that killing children was a necessity, and that good would come of it.
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#8. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 07, 201211Year Member
Posts: 3,732
Reputation Power: 362
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 07, 201211Year Member
Posts: 3,732
Reputation Power: 362
I believe the government has been attempting for a long time to take away our guns for dominance over the people.
This must be a very bi-polar government considering it tried to pass gun legislation, was blocked, despite being agreed upon by both Democrat and Republican politicians, staged a Democratic sit in against itself to try to pass the legislation again, was unsuccessful and then filed an ethics complaint against the Democrats who staged the sit in.
You understand that the Government isn't one big bad entity?
It's two major and competing ideologies and the Democrats would have learnt 5 mass shootings ago that they don't work in trying to put gun reform through if they were staging them.
Mass shootings happen because people have ideologies which make them believe that they are righteous in killing other people. These people exist, they get hold of guns, and they commit mass shootings. There isn't some huge conspiracy needed to explain this phenomenon.
I believe in the truth
Nobody on this planet has ever said that they believe in the lies. Or that they believe in the mistruths.
- 2useful
- 0not useful
#9. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 27, 201212Year Member
Posts: 2,819
Reputation Power: 357
Renzel wrote First off, I wanna say I'm a believer in God, I believe in the truth, and I believe the government is a bunch of bullshit people trying to take away our right to bear arms.
Personally, I believe the government has been attempting for a long time to take away our guns for dominance over the people. Also I believe that MOST (not all) mass shootings documented by major news channels are setups just so they can use that as an example to take away our guns.
Example: The Orlando shooting was on every single news channel in the country. There was also 2 other shootings in Oakland and Chicago, but they're not as heavily documented as the Orlando shooting. What makes the Orlando shooting different then the other 2 shootings? Why isn't the Chicago and Oakland shootings not as popular as the Orlando one? Like I said, the major shootings are setups by the government and the ones nobody knows about, I believe are the actual legit shootings.
I'm not saying that the major shootings like Sandy Hook (complete bs btw) and the Orlando one are 100% fake, but if you look at the facts presented by the news, it doesn't make sense at all. I saw this one video of this guy saying that there was another person keeping the doors shut so nobody can get out and as soon as the person said that, he got cut off. Also people are saying that the number of rounds he had, the amount of people he killed, the time it takes for him to reload that type of gun doesn't make sense. Just a bunch of coverups and lies.
The news is complete bullshit that are ran by higher ups so they can brainwash people.
What do you guys think?
RIP to the victims.
The government tries to take away more and more from you everyday. They do so many things that equate to something larger. IMO population control
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#10. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 24, 201211Year Member
Posts: 1,498
Reputation Power: 79
The government doesn't want, or need to take away your guns. With the NRA being a major contributor during congressional elections, I hardly doubt the government wants to come take guns away. Instead, the government, with help from mainstream media, is able to cause a huge division that forces people to limit their opinions to two choices on major issues. We've been arguing about the same issues for decades. These same issues are the reasons most people still stick with one of two shitty political parties: gay marriage, immigration, abortion, gun control, etc. In a civilized society, we should be beyond these issues, right? However, if people don't caste their vote based on these argumentative topics, what are they supposed to vote for? Perhaps the real issues that control legislation like: money in politics, or how both major political parties are damn near the same when you strip away their stances on social issues? Well they sure don't want that.
"The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum. -Noam Chomsky
"The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum. -Noam Chomsky
- 4useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.