You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
FLAT EARTH | TRUE OR FALSE?
Posted:
FLAT EARTH | TRUE OR FALSE?Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 09, 201211Year Member
Posts: 640
Reputation Power: 25
Now, before you go criticizing, don't just say 'no its bull' because you have grown up thinking we live on a globe. I will include sources of info, and my own thoughts.
Believe it or not there is a substantial amount of evidence to back up the flat earth theory.
Also, if you have already thought "oh f*ck off" and thinking about leaving this page. Then you my friend are in denial and have a closed mind. Open it, and allow yourself to think that it could actually be true.
My personal opinion, is that its very likely.
Now, to get this debate started, im going to say this.. All of NASAs 'photos' of the earth, show a perfect SPHERE.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Nothing wrong with that 'photo' right? Sure believe what you wish, just don't forget NASAs OFFICIAL archive stating, the earth is an OBLATE SPHEROID, not a perfect sphere.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Or what about Neil DeGrasse Tyson, stating the earth is 'pear shaped'.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Which one is it? Pear shaped, an oblate spheroid or a perfect sphere. All supposedly 'credible' sources saying different things.
REMINDER: It is said, that Tyson is a Freemason, just like all of the astronauts that 'went to the moon'. But I will leave that topic for another time.
What am I getting at you ask? Well, just take a look at this.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Now, hence how it bulges outwards at the equator. Because you can certainly NOT, see any type of bulge in the 'official image' of the Earth, posted by NASA. In fact, it is indistinguishable, from a perfect sphere.
My point is, NASA are blatantly lying, in your face. And the official image of the earth, is infact a fu**ing CGI created image. A bad one, actually.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Wow.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Just, wow.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
I mean c'mon, really?! All 'official images' of the Earth. And yet the colours are changing and so is the landmass.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
How does this link in with the earth being flat you ask?
Quite simply because, the maps NASA provide are something like 80% accurate, give or take. I mean every single map they provide. To be honest, it probably is a lot less than 80%, but whatever.
Now have a look at Hogwash's flat earth map, released in 1892. Otherwise known as the Azimuthal Equidistant projection. It is rumoured to be 99.9% accurate, the most accurate map to date.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
This is where it gets scary, below is a more rough copy of the AE map, next to the United Nations official logo, notice how the AE map is in the background? Yeah I know, such a coincidence right..
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
It is literally being smeared in your face, like a piece of sh*t.
To flat earth veterans, this stuff is the basics, so sorry if you haven't learned anything new today.
I have so much more stuff to include. Like the answer to "wouldn't we fall of the edge?". No we wouldn't. ask me why, ill tell you.
But seriously now, try looking at the horizon, its DEAD FLAT. NO CURVATURE. But sure, the earth is spherical.. Which leads me to my next explanation.
Just remember that some of Pythagoras' work, like the theorem for example. Is deemed incorrect. He may say 'it's round', but it doesn't mean anything.
Might i also point out that the Pythagorean 'proof' of curvature, and the explanation on why the horizon appears flat. Is unobservable, unmeasurable and also unrepeatable. Making it nothing more than a hypothesis with NO evidence to back it up.
When in reality, the flat horizon, on a flat earth model, can be measured, observed and repeated. Having actual observable and measureable evidence, moreover than Pyhtagorean, and you can do this by youself with the right equipment.
Due to the 'curvature of the earth', every 30 miles the curvature should drop about 600ft, working out at about 8 inches per mile. The measurements dramatically changing every mile, also. This is based on Pythagoras' theory that the Earth's circumference is 25,000 miles.
Which is deemed correct in this day and age. When in reality it is not.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
The only problem is, you can see the Chicago skyline, from the shore of lake Michigan. Which using Pythagorean measurements, would be well under the 'curvature' of the earth, and totally invisible. However it's clearly visible..
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Actually, there are many things that can be seen, when they should be under the supposed 'curvature'. Like the view of France from Dover in England. Which spans over 20 miles. Should be accoring to Pythagoras, 266 feet below the horizon. Hmm..
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Or like the NYC skyline for example, taken from over 20 miles out.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
To take it to extremes, this is 40 miles out. By now, that skyline should be about 1066 feet below the horizon. The buildings0 should also be showing a slight, slant some directions. Funny that..
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
You get the point.
As for the Chicago skyline image, according to this guy, it's a superior mirage.. (By the way this is a different image, further proving it's nothing to do with the 'weather conditions')
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
When actually, a superior mirage looks like this, with the horizon inverted.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
More cover up lies from the mainstream media.. Of course though, if a regular viewer see's it on the news, they won't bother questioning, why would they? After all they believe everything that comes out their mouth.
I remember someone mentioning something about, how the flat earth wouldn't work because of gravity. Let me point out, that gravity is nothing but a theory, always has been.
The force itself cannot be measured, the only thing that backs it up is the fact you can go into zero-g if you are experimenting correctly, like for example nosediving in a plane.
This technique is used to film in the 'ISS' a.k.a, a nosediving aeroplane. Bare in mind an aeroplane can only have a zero-g, nosediving period of 27 seconds. They have to morph the separate videos together, and make it look like one take. Like shown in the video below..
Mute audio if you have to. I found it pretty annoying.
The crew, explained how it was done below.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
In case you want to look for yourself, the article is below
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
If you're wondering what I'm getting at, it is this. The technique used to shoot this video, making it look like it was shot in one take, when in actuality, there were several shots. They then, very smoothly morphed the clips together. All being 27 seconds long.
If a small band can do it, and make in unnoticeable, you can imagine the extent NASA could go to, to perfect this technique.
But as there a number of possibilities why zero-g can be performed; 1 being Parabolic Flight, the other being the speed and poisition of such flight. The other I'm not fully aware of, so if you would enlighten me, I would appreciate it.
For me, and any person with an intellect for that matter.. It is simply not enough evidence.
Back on topic..
I would also like to see you navigate the ocean using a globe, wouldn't work.. . Hence why radar essentially uses a flat earth map (Azimuthal Equidistant projection ~ north polar aspect). Only in a much smaller radius.
The same as GPS, does not work over some parts of the Ocean. Specifically because of certain flight paths they have to take. In order to make it appear as though GPS works overseas, on their model of the map.
Lastly. So far this is the best evidence I have seen yet, proving the sun is NOT 93 million miles away. Watch the whole video if you like, but for the best bit, skip to 2:30, watch the sun get further away.
The sun is not going under or over the earth as it is meant to appear (us apparently orbiting the sun). Instead is simply circling above us, like shown on the time zone gif, then hitting the vanishing point. Just like a road.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
If you don't know what the vanishing point is, it is the point where perspective converges to a point of vanishing (hence the name). In this case, where the two parallel lines meet on the horizon.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
It is the same as the earth, except the radius is obviously larger.
Ultimately, just remember, biblical explanations have been around longer than the theory of evolution.
Evolution is literally defining the opposite of the bibles claims. Lets face it though, if you can convince someone the the truth is Evolution (A), when the ACTUAL truth is the complete opposite (Z). It will be nearly impossible to convince the person that the truth is Z, because they're whole life they thought it was A.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
This is actually, believe it or not. To do with satanism, and it is called the law of reversal. If you don't believe me, research it.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
It is a brainwashing methodology, and a very f*cking clever one. The same way they have disconnected the youths, even some adults from society, everyone is now doing things virtually.
Instead of physically, even though in some aspects it easier, more useful and more helpful people have failed to realize the repercussions of said methods.
Last edited by Schwarz ; edited 1 time in total
Believe it or not there is a substantial amount of evidence to back up the flat earth theory.
Also, if you have already thought "oh f*ck off" and thinking about leaving this page. Then you my friend are in denial and have a closed mind. Open it, and allow yourself to think that it could actually be true.
My personal opinion, is that its very likely.
Now, to get this debate started, im going to say this.. All of NASAs 'photos' of the earth, show a perfect SPHERE.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Nothing wrong with that 'photo' right? Sure believe what you wish, just don't forget NASAs OFFICIAL archive stating, the earth is an OBLATE SPHEROID, not a perfect sphere.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Or what about Neil DeGrasse Tyson, stating the earth is 'pear shaped'.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Which one is it? Pear shaped, an oblate spheroid or a perfect sphere. All supposedly 'credible' sources saying different things.
REMINDER: It is said, that Tyson is a Freemason, just like all of the astronauts that 'went to the moon'. But I will leave that topic for another time.
What am I getting at you ask? Well, just take a look at this.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Now, hence how it bulges outwards at the equator. Because you can certainly NOT, see any type of bulge in the 'official image' of the Earth, posted by NASA. In fact, it is indistinguishable, from a perfect sphere.
My point is, NASA are blatantly lying, in your face. And the official image of the earth, is infact a fu**ing CGI created image. A bad one, actually.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Wow.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Just, wow.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
I mean c'mon, really?! All 'official images' of the Earth. And yet the colours are changing and so is the landmass.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
How does this link in with the earth being flat you ask?
Quite simply because, the maps NASA provide are something like 80% accurate, give or take. I mean every single map they provide. To be honest, it probably is a lot less than 80%, but whatever.
Now have a look at Hogwash's flat earth map, released in 1892. Otherwise known as the Azimuthal Equidistant projection. It is rumoured to be 99.9% accurate, the most accurate map to date.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
This is where it gets scary, below is a more rough copy of the AE map, next to the United Nations official logo, notice how the AE map is in the background? Yeah I know, such a coincidence right..
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
It is literally being smeared in your face, like a piece of sh*t.
To flat earth veterans, this stuff is the basics, so sorry if you haven't learned anything new today.
I have so much more stuff to include. Like the answer to "wouldn't we fall of the edge?". No we wouldn't. ask me why, ill tell you.
But seriously now, try looking at the horizon, its DEAD FLAT. NO CURVATURE. But sure, the earth is spherical.. Which leads me to my next explanation.
Just remember that some of Pythagoras' work, like the theorem for example. Is deemed incorrect. He may say 'it's round', but it doesn't mean anything.
Might i also point out that the Pythagorean 'proof' of curvature, and the explanation on why the horizon appears flat. Is unobservable, unmeasurable and also unrepeatable. Making it nothing more than a hypothesis with NO evidence to back it up.
When in reality, the flat horizon, on a flat earth model, can be measured, observed and repeated. Having actual observable and measureable evidence, moreover than Pyhtagorean, and you can do this by youself with the right equipment.
Due to the 'curvature of the earth', every 30 miles the curvature should drop about 600ft, working out at about 8 inches per mile. The measurements dramatically changing every mile, also. This is based on Pythagoras' theory that the Earth's circumference is 25,000 miles.
Which is deemed correct in this day and age. When in reality it is not.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
The only problem is, you can see the Chicago skyline, from the shore of lake Michigan. Which using Pythagorean measurements, would be well under the 'curvature' of the earth, and totally invisible. However it's clearly visible..
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Actually, there are many things that can be seen, when they should be under the supposed 'curvature'. Like the view of France from Dover in England. Which spans over 20 miles. Should be accoring to Pythagoras, 266 feet below the horizon. Hmm..
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Or like the NYC skyline for example, taken from over 20 miles out.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
To take it to extremes, this is 40 miles out. By now, that skyline should be about 1066 feet below the horizon. The buildings0 should also be showing a slight, slant some directions. Funny that..
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
You get the point.
As for the Chicago skyline image, according to this guy, it's a superior mirage.. (By the way this is a different image, further proving it's nothing to do with the 'weather conditions')
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
When actually, a superior mirage looks like this, with the horizon inverted.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
More cover up lies from the mainstream media.. Of course though, if a regular viewer see's it on the news, they won't bother questioning, why would they? After all they believe everything that comes out their mouth.
I remember someone mentioning something about, how the flat earth wouldn't work because of gravity. Let me point out, that gravity is nothing but a theory, always has been.
The force itself cannot be measured, the only thing that backs it up is the fact you can go into zero-g if you are experimenting correctly, like for example nosediving in a plane.
This technique is used to film in the 'ISS' a.k.a, a nosediving aeroplane. Bare in mind an aeroplane can only have a zero-g, nosediving period of 27 seconds. They have to morph the separate videos together, and make it look like one take. Like shown in the video below..
Mute audio if you have to. I found it pretty annoying.
The crew, explained how it was done below.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
In case you want to look for yourself, the article is below
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
If you're wondering what I'm getting at, it is this. The technique used to shoot this video, making it look like it was shot in one take, when in actuality, there were several shots. They then, very smoothly morphed the clips together. All being 27 seconds long.
If a small band can do it, and make in unnoticeable, you can imagine the extent NASA could go to, to perfect this technique.
But as there a number of possibilities why zero-g can be performed; 1 being Parabolic Flight, the other being the speed and poisition of such flight. The other I'm not fully aware of, so if you would enlighten me, I would appreciate it.
For me, and any person with an intellect for that matter.. It is simply not enough evidence.
Back on topic..
I would also like to see you navigate the ocean using a globe, wouldn't work.. . Hence why radar essentially uses a flat earth map (Azimuthal Equidistant projection ~ north polar aspect). Only in a much smaller radius.
The same as GPS, does not work over some parts of the Ocean. Specifically because of certain flight paths they have to take. In order to make it appear as though GPS works overseas, on their model of the map.
Lastly. So far this is the best evidence I have seen yet, proving the sun is NOT 93 million miles away. Watch the whole video if you like, but for the best bit, skip to 2:30, watch the sun get further away.
The sun is not going under or over the earth as it is meant to appear (us apparently orbiting the sun). Instead is simply circling above us, like shown on the time zone gif, then hitting the vanishing point. Just like a road.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
If you don't know what the vanishing point is, it is the point where perspective converges to a point of vanishing (hence the name). In this case, where the two parallel lines meet on the horizon.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
It is the same as the earth, except the radius is obviously larger.
Ultimately, just remember, biblical explanations have been around longer than the theory of evolution.
Evolution is literally defining the opposite of the bibles claims. Lets face it though, if you can convince someone the the truth is Evolution (A), when the ACTUAL truth is the complete opposite (Z). It will be nearly impossible to convince the person that the truth is Z, because they're whole life they thought it was A.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
This is actually, believe it or not. To do with satanism, and it is called the law of reversal. If you don't believe me, research it.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
It is a brainwashing methodology, and a very f*cking clever one. The same way they have disconnected the youths, even some adults from society, everyone is now doing things virtually.
Instead of physically, even though in some aspects it easier, more useful and more helpful people have failed to realize the repercussions of said methods.
Last edited by Schwarz ; edited 1 time in total
The following 1 user thanked Schwarz for this useful post:
Dreamerr (03-27-2016)
#2. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 13, 20149Year Member
Posts: 5,592
Reputation Power: 61
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 13, 20149Year Member
Posts: 5,592
Reputation Power: 61
I have seen many videos on this and I kinda believe in flat earth, but tbh Idrc because it doesn't pertain to me. I don't trust anything that a government based source would tell me and I also don't care because it's not like I would fall off of the edge of the earth
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#3. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 11, 201410Year Member
Posts: 6,656
Reputation Power: 29382
Motto: We love you Angel, forever in our hearts.
Motto: We love you Angel, forever in our hearts.
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 11, 201410Year Member
Posts: 6,656
Reputation Power: 29382
Motto: We love you Angel, forever in our hearts.
You really must be retarded...
Have you not seen space. jfc
Have you not seen space. jfc
- 3useful
- 1not useful
#4. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 29, 20159Year Member
Posts: 2,430
Reputation Power: 319
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 29, 20159Year Member
Posts: 2,430
Reputation Power: 319
maybe then use a different lens lol
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#5. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 09, 201310Year Member
Posts: 800
Reputation Power: 66
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 09, 201310Year Member
Posts: 800
Reputation Power: 66
This post, Is just, Ughh, People the believe the earth is flat obviously don't know what "science is"
How is science involved you may ask? well if the earth was flat gravity would be weak, we won't have seasons, Please take this post some where else.
How is science involved you may ask? well if the earth was flat gravity would be weak, we won't have seasons, Please take this post some where else.
- 0useful
- 1not useful
#6. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 09, 201211Year Member
Posts: 640
Reputation Power: 25
Guhwap wrote I have seen many videos on this and I kinda believe in flat earth, but tbh Idrc because it doesn't pertain to me. I don't trust anything that a government based source would tell me and I also don't care because it's not like I would fall off of the edge of the earth
Yep, me neither. The government systematically steal our money, and call it 'tax'. Then use it to create war and other bullsh*t.
Why would you honestly trust a cooperate entity's word, if they lie to you so they can have your money, and basically say: "If you don't let me have your money, I will lock you in a big metal room."
- 2useful
- 1not useful
#7. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 13, 201310Year Member
Posts: 6,086
Reputation Power: 459
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 13, 201310Year Member
Posts: 6,086
Reputation Power: 459
I'm sorry but you are an idiot to believe the Earth is flat in this day and age. Let's take the horizon for example, say you are standing on a flat plateau of land with a tree just at the horizon, and another tree just beyond the horizon, you can only see the tree on the horizon as it is all the curvature of the earth allows you to see. If you go higher you can see the further tree as the curvature of the earth allows you to.
As for the united nations logo, it's like that so it can include all the nations of the earth they didn't do it because of some crazy conspiracy theory, sorry to burst your bubble.
As for the united nations logo, it's like that so it can include all the nations of the earth they didn't do it because of some crazy conspiracy theory, sorry to burst your bubble.
- 3useful
- 1not useful
#8. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 09, 201211Year Member
Posts: 640
Reputation Power: 25
Blends wrote You really must be retarded...
Have you not seen space. jfc
No, I haven't, and neither have you.
And anyway, what does space have to do with all the facts i just provided you with?
Still though, 'space', and the stars revolve around the earth, hence why polaris is stationary and the Coriolis effect is created. If you read parts of the bible (I'm not a bible basher, but I would take an ancient books word, over a thieving government) it states that the earth is stationary.
But sure, space exists because NASA and they're pretty images of galaxy's are eye-candy.
Ignorance is bliss, do your research, peasant ;)
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#9. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 09, 201211Year Member
Posts: 640
Reputation Power: 25
Navigate wrote This post, Is just, Ughh, People the believe the earth is flat obviously don't know what "science is"
How is science involved you may ask? well if the earth was flat gravity would be weak, we won't have seasons, Please take this post some where else.
Oh look, another ignorant person, who probably didn't even bother reading the whole post.
I never said I believed it, I said its highly likely.
Carry on..
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#10. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 09, 201211Year Member
Posts: 640
Reputation Power: 25
Pryzel wrote I'm sorry but you are an idiot to believe the Earth is flat in this day and age. Let's take the horizon for example, say you are standing on a flat plateau of land with a tree just at the horizon, and another tree just beyond the horizon, you can only see the tree on the horizon as it is all the curvature of the earth allows you to see. If you go higher you can see the further tree as the curvature of the earth allows you to.
As for the united nations logo, it's like that so it can include all the nations of the earth they didn't do it because of some crazy conspiracy theory, sorry to burst your bubble.
Yes because your CGI image totally disproves my theory, you must be kidding right?
Not being spiteful but that is total bullsh*t, and something NASA and other space agency's, spherical earthers etc.. has planted on the internet. If what your saying was the case, then the horizon would drop as you go upwards towards "space". But it doesn't, as you go upwards, the horizon stays at eye level. This would simply be impossible on a spherical earth.
And your claims about the U.N flag, plausible to say the least. Can you link me to your source? Much obliged.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.