TaDeDraGz wrote

Euclid wrote

TaDeDraGz wrote

Euclid wrote

TTGD3VIL wrote hell no why do you think we have area 51 thats where they made that little fake scene of the dude landing on the moon

Where is your evidence?
The statement, 'There's a pink unicorn flying around the sun right now' has just as much credibility.

Where is your evidence then? the statement 'we're going to Mars' has just as much credibility too. Because like the Unicorn statement , no one knows if it's real because there's no evidence.

We're going to Mars is a statement about the future, it's not happening right now.
And the proof that they intend to go to Mars is that they've built the ship and hired the astronauts.
They intend to go to Mars.

Once they have said that they are currently on their way to Mars, then you can start to say that they aren't, that is when your evidence will be available.

Saying that they built a set for the Moon landing in Area 51 needs evidence like that to be taken seriously.

Face it, every single piece of evidence you have given as to why the Moon landing was faked has been refuted.
You have absolutely no rational reason to believe that it was faked, and the only reason that you continue to hold onto that belief is because you want it to be true.
I don't know what it is that you have against the US Government, but it's obviously clouding your ability to think logically about this situation.

Given that you believe in the Moon landing being faked and Area 51 holding aliens, it seems like you've watched too many conspiracy theorist videos and movies, all of which cherry pick their information and won't give a balanced view.

NASA can demonstrate that they have the ability to get to Mars, you are going against the majority of the scientific community who agree with that view. You are going against the majority of the scientific community who agree that we did go to the Moon.
You are going against the majority of the scientific community who simply want evidence that aliens are in Area 51, rather than conjecture.

Yet you state on your topic about God that you are 'with science' ?
You are not with science, you are with faith and belief about almost every topic you have posted in the Conspiracy Forum.

No you're wrong in everything you said about me. I never said the words 'NASA can't get to Mars' and i believe what i believe in. I am with science that proves God doesn't exist, God and that sort of topic is totally different. And fyi i don't really watch theory videos, movies etc. Respect what i believe in and if you had made this topic i would've given evidence that you couldn't reply to. And stop bringing my other topics on this one.

You didn't clarify whether or not you said NASA couldn't get to Mars, your grammar, or lack thereof, made it very difficult to understand exactly what you were saying, and I did bring this up earlier in this thread but you didn't respond to it.
But now that you finally have clarified [I think], why do you think that? Because according to you there is no evidence.
That's not what scientists do is it? Believe in stuff based on no evidence?
Yet you still said this: 'the statement 'we're going to Mars' has just as much credibility [ ... as saying that a pink unicorn is flying around the Sun]'

Your other topics are relevant here because the majority of them have been in favor of conspiracy theories.
They are relevant to your reasoning.

That's the point, I wouldn't have made this topic because I don't believe in things based on bad evidence.

You have brought up:
Lack of stars - refuted.
Reflection in the visor - refuted.
Movement of the astronauts - refuted.
Shadows from multiple directions - refuted.
Reflectors sent by miniature rockets - refuted.
The 'C' rock - refuted.
Golf on the Moon - refuted.
Rocks from the Moon identical to rocks on Earth - refuted.
The flag moving - Refuted.
Not being back to the Moon - refuted.

You can 'believe what you believe in' but don't act like the evidence is leaning in your favor.
I respect people's opinions when they have good reasoning behind those opinions, or they simply admit that they have those opinions based on faith.
So far you have provided no reasoning for why the Moon landing was faked which can't be explained.

Now you can either give more reasoning, or further explain your reasoning for any of the points above.
But you can't blame me for being short with you considering we have just spent 5 pages debating this and then you say that you won't believe me unless you see it with your own eyes, which is impossible.

This topic is just making me impatient, and I apologize for that, but unless you reply with more reasoning for why the Moon landing was faked I'll not be replying [which you might not care about.]

Euclid wrote

TaDeDraGz wrote

Euclid wrote

TaDeDraGz wrote

Euclid wrote

TTGD3VIL wrote hell no why do you think we have area 51 thats where they made that little fake scene of the dude landing on the moon

Where is your evidence?
The statement, 'There's a pink unicorn flying around the sun right now' has just as much credibility.

Where is your evidence then? the statement 'we're going to Mars' has just as much credibility too. Because like the Unicorn statement , no one knows if it's real because there's no evidence.

We're going to Mars is a statement about the future, it's not happening right now.
And the proof that they intend to go to Mars is that they've built the ship and hired the astronauts.
They intend to go to Mars.

Once they have said that they are currently on their way to Mars, then you can start to say that they aren't, that is when your evidence will be available.

Saying that they built a set for the Moon landing in Area 51 needs evidence like that to be taken seriously.

Face it, every single piece of evidence you have given as to why the Moon landing was faked has been refuted.
You have absolutely no rational reason to believe that it was faked, and the only reason that you continue to hold onto that belief is because you want it to be true.
I don't know what it is that you have against the US Government, but it's obviously clouding your ability to think logically about this situation.

Given that you believe in the Moon landing being faked and Area 51 holding aliens, it seems like you've watched too many conspiracy theorist videos and movies, all of which cherry pick their information and won't give a balanced view.

NASA can demonstrate that they have the ability to get to Mars, you are going against the majority of the scientific community who agree with that view. You are going against the majority of the scientific community who agree that we did go to the Moon.
You are going against the majority of the scientific community who simply want evidence that aliens are in Area 51, rather than conjecture.

Yet you state on your topic about God that you are 'with science' ?
You are not with science, you are with faith and belief about almost every topic you have posted in the Conspiracy Forum.

No you're wrong in everything you said about me. I never said the words 'NASA can't get to Mars' and i believe what i believe in. I am with science that proves God doesn't exist, God and that sort of topic is totally different. And fyi i don't really watch theory videos, movies etc. Respect what i believe in and if you had made this topic i would've given evidence that you couldn't reply to. And stop bringing my other topics on this one.

You didn't clarify whether or not you said NASA couldn't get to Mars, your grammar, or lack thereof, made it very difficult to understand exactly what you were saying, and I did bring this up earlier in this thread but you didn't respond to it.
But now that you finally have clarified [I think], why do you think that? Because according to you there is no evidence.
That's not what scientists do is it? Believe in stuff based on no evidence?
Yet you still said this: 'the statement 'we're going to Mars' has just as much credibility [ ... as saying that a pink unicorn is flying around the Sun]'

Your other topics are relevant here because the majority of them have been in favor of conspiracy theories.
They are relevant to your reasoning.

That's the point, I wouldn't have made this topic because I don't believe in things based on bad evidence.

You have brought up:
Lack of stars - refuted.
Reflection in the visor - refuted.
Movement of the astronauts - refuted.
Shadows from multiple directions - refuted.
Reflectors sent by miniature rockets - refuted.
The 'C' rock - refuted.
Golf on the Moon - refuted.
Rocks from the Moon identical to rocks on Earth - refuted.
The flag moving - Refuted.
Not being back to the Moon - refuted.

You can 'believe what you believe in' but don't act like the evidence is leaning in your favor.
I respect people's opinions when they have good reasoning behind those opinions, or they simply admit that they have those opinions based on faith.
So far you have provided no reasoning for why the Moon landing was faked which can't be explained.

Now you can either give more reasoning, or further explain your reasoning for any of the points above.
But you can't blame me for being short with you considering we have just spent 5 pages debating this and then you say that you won't believe me unless you see it with your own eyes, which is impossible.

This topic is just making me impatient, and I apologize for that, but unless you reply with more reasoning for why the Moon landing was faked I'll not be replying [which you might not care about.]

all of my questions (which were refuted) i understand your answers but they don't exactly prove the moon landings. No one knows if it's true other than the government and the astronauts (and others) involved. I still think the same about my evidence (that's been answered).

I sometimes question if they actually go to the moon or not but i think i only doubt it because of how crazy it is thinking about somebody really being up there in the skies! I'd honestly love to do their job it would be unreal!!

I would say so. I've always thought there must be secret space missions that they don't tell us about..

Sometimes I wonder if we're actually building a moon base.

Honestly I want to thank the both of you for making my day interesting, great read through all of this. Well done! I still believe we went to the moon

I also believe we went to the moon. I cant seem to find this video though "moon fake not" is it called "moon hoax not"? With a man in the picture?

there should totally be a conspiracy theorist badge on ttg

ZTG wrote Yes of course we did, it's been proven multiple times.

Why don't we go there again? BECAUSE IT COSTS A LOT OF BLOODY MONEY

The Apollo mission cost 25.4 Billion US dollars. In today's money, that's about 150 Billion dollars.
Our military in 2015 spend 598.5 billion


Is it really too much?

Aced wrote

ZTG wrote Yes of course we did, it's been proven multiple times.

Why don't we go there again? BECAUSE IT COSTS A LOT OF BLOODY MONEY

The Apollo mission cost 25.4 Billion US dollars. In today's money, that's about 150 Billion dollars.
Our military in 2015 spend 598.5 billion


Is it really too much?

Considering the US spends more on its military than the next 7 highest countries combined, yes, it's too much.
If your point is that the US shouldn't spend so much on it's military and should instead fund NASA [and other more important things] then I completely agree.

However, for the sake of going to the Moon to see more of what we already have and collect more samples of what we have already collected before, it's pointless.

I find it funny that even after all the information (that is correct) still have trouble thinking that we faked the moon landing. OP stated that the flag is "waving", when in reality they included aluminium wires within the flag to give it a more realistic effect. It would be disappointing to take a flag into space and have it dangling. Also a lot of attention has been given to the fact that you can't see the stars in the background. "If there aren't stars, it's obviously fake....", which is completely wrong. The brightness of the moon saturates the camera, if you think this is false try taking a picture of the stars with your camera when the moon is out. You may see them, but it's impossible for the saturation of the camera to pick them up.