You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
Purchased build, Issues?
Posted:

Purchased build, Issues?Posted:

10wnu9
  • Resident Elite
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 15, 201310Year Member
Posts: 276
Reputation Power: 10
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 15, 201310Year Member
Posts: 276
Reputation Power: 10
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

That is my build, I initially thought it would be fine but I've been informed that the Wireless Network Adapter might not fit in the PCI slot, anyway, if that's not the case what would you change in the build?

Thanks for your time.


EDIT - Another thing I haven't actually purchased that monitor, I've been pondering on what to get and for price and effectiveness it seems like this Packard bell is the best option - [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
#2. Posted:
Realities
  • Rising Star
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 09, 201310Year Member
Posts: 731
Reputation Power: 29
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 09, 201310Year Member
Posts: 731
Reputation Power: 29
Fx-6350 is faster as it puts more speed on each core go for the 6core you will save money and it is better for gaming
as the hyper threading is allot better also

and the gtx 760 costs 20 pounds more than the 270x it has allot
more graphics power go for thst card
#3. Posted:
Realities
  • Rising Star
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 09, 201310Year Member
Posts: 731
Reputation Power: 29
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 09, 201310Year Member
Posts: 731
Reputation Power: 29
Also the Packard bell monitor is nice i would buy one but i would have to downgrade the build im going to be doing
i can only use a Tv for my build with like 40Hz LOL but it will be
fine until o can afford one

also get the Hypet 212 evo CPU fan and Get Low profile Vengeance ram
#4. Posted:
10wnu9
  • Resident Elite
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 15, 201310Year Member
Posts: 276
Reputation Power: 10
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 15, 201310Year Member
Posts: 276
Reputation Power: 10
I've heard that the FX-8320 is better than the previous versions but maybe I'm completely incorrect But I do believe it was Factory OCed right? Anyway tough, I can't change that now but the 8320 is still a great CPU also my budget is very very tight and the 270X did come with great performance and (I know cringe right here but when you're strapped for cash...) a free copy of BF4. I've heard that people are running this build on almost any game with 45+ fps maxed out graphics on most games. Alas if not I can't moan, it sure beats my Advent DA2207 AIO lmfao.


Anyway, thanks for your time Realities
#5. Posted:
10wnu9
  • Resident Elite
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 15, 201310Year Member
Posts: 276
Reputation Power: 10
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 15, 201310Year Member
Posts: 276
Reputation Power: 10
Yep, I will definitely be purchasing myself a 212 cooler when I can! I've heard great things about them and I will probably OC, if not I'll settle for a higher priced H100 ;)
#6. Posted:
Realities
  • Rising Star
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 09, 201310Year Member
Posts: 731
Reputation Power: 29
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 09, 201310Year Member
Posts: 731
Reputation Power: 29
Yeh the 8320 is a great cpu if youre not playing cpu intensive games if you play cpu intensive games you may get less fps
than what u would with the 6320 as AMD added 2 more cores
by splitting all the other cores into another two which taken power from the cores that are important to use
#7. Posted:
Zayev
  • TTG Commander
Status: Offline
Joined: May 20, 201113Year Member
Posts: 6,315
Reputation Power: 351
Status: Offline
Joined: May 20, 201113Year Member
Posts: 6,315
Reputation Power: 351
Realities wrote Yeh the 8320 is a great cpu if youre not playing cpu intensive games if you play cpu intensive games you may get less fps
than what u would with the 6320 as AMD added 2 more cores
by splitting all the other cores into another two which taken power from the cores that are important to use


uuh what. You kinda contradicted yourself there...
"AMD added 2 more cores"
"if you play cpu intensive games you may get less fps"

OP The 8320 is a great CPU.
The 8350 is the standard overclocked edition
#8. Posted:
Realities
  • Rising Star
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 09, 201310Year Member
Posts: 731
Reputation Power: 29
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 09, 201310Year Member
Posts: 731
Reputation Power: 29
Terrabytez wrote
Realities wrote Yeh the 8320 is a great cpu if youre not playing cpu intensive games if you play cpu intensive games you may get less fps
than what u would with the 6320 as AMD added 2 more cores
by splitting all the other cores into another two which taken power from the cores that are important to use


uuh what. You kinda contradicted yourself there...
"AMD added 2 more cores"
"if you play cpu intensive games you may get less fps"

OP The 8320 is a great CPU.
The 8350 is the standard overclocked edition


Look at benchmarks 6300 is better st single core programs
and has Better Hyper-Threading than the 8 core because
AMD Broke 2 cores in half and put them as another 2 cores
and named it the 8300 its a rip off as the 6000 series is better
and cheaper
#9. Posted:
Realities
  • Rising Star
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 09, 201310Year Member
Posts: 731
Reputation Power: 29
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 09, 201310Year Member
Posts: 731
Reputation Power: 29
Terrabytez wrote
Realities wrote Yeh the 8320 is a great cpu if youre not playing cpu intensive games if you play cpu intensive games you may get less fps
than what u would with the 6320 as AMD added 2 more cores
by splitting all the other cores into another two which taken power from the cores that are important to use


uuh what. You kinda contradicted yourself there...
"AMD added 2 more cores"
"if you play cpu intensive games you may get less fps"

OP The 8320 is a great CPU.
The 8350 is the standard overclocked edition


Look at benchmarks 6300 is better st single core programs
and has Better Hyper-Threading than the 8 core because
AMD Broke 2 cores in half and put them as another 2 cores
and named it the 8300 its a rip off as the 6000 series is better
and cheaper
#10. Posted:
10wnu9
  • Resident Elite
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 15, 201310Year Member
Posts: 276
Reputation Power: 10
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 15, 201310Year Member
Posts: 276
Reputation Power: 10
Realities wrote
Terrabytez wrote
Realities wrote Yeh the 8320 is a great cpu if youre not playing cpu intensive games if you play cpu intensive games you may get less fps
than what u would with the 6320 as AMD added 2 more cores
by splitting all the other cores into another two which taken power from the cores that are important to use


uuh what. You kinda contradicted yourself there...
"AMD added 2 more cores"
"if you play cpu intensive games you may get less fps"

OP The 8320 is a great CPU.
The 8350 is the standard overclocked edition


Look at benchmarks 6300 is better st single core programs
and has Better Hyper-Threading than the 8 core because
AMD Broke 2 cores in half and put them as another 2 cores
and named it the 8300 its a rip off as the 6000 series is better
and cheaper


They do not have Hyper Threading.. Also the 8320 definitely is better although the FX-6300 get's almost all jobs done.
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.