You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
Hardware Reviews
Posted:

Hardware ReviewsPosted:

r00t
  • Administrator
Status: Offline
Joined: May 18, 201112Year Member
Posts: 16,359
Reputation Power: 24344
Status: Offline
Joined: May 18, 201112Year Member
Posts: 16,359
Reputation Power: 24344
In this topic, you can post reviews of hardware you own or have had experience with.
Thanks to Kyle93 for the idea

Some tips for writing a good and informative review:

  • Your review should be based on facts and observations rather than opinions. Support what you are saying.

  • Keep in mind that you don't own the competitor's product. For instance, you may think that your graphics card is "quiet" at load, but you have no way of knowing how its noise levels compare to other manufacturers' versions of the same card.

  • Know your limits. You are probably not properly equipped to properly review power supplies, so I suggest using quality reviews from reputable sources instead of posting your own. Make sure you check your facts and know what you're talking about.

  • Not everyone will use their computer the same way you do, so a product may not fit your needs, but it may be exactly what another person needs. You should mention what kind of user a product would be good for as well as whom it would not suit well.

  • Pictures are nice!

  • Include measurements. For the sake of consistency, please use the following programs:



All reviews
(Links to your post with the name of what you review will be entered below)

CPUs

Graphics cards

Motherboards

Memory

Cases

CPU Coolers

SSDs/HDDs

Peripherals

Other

The following 30 users thanked r00t for this useful post:

NinjaActually (10-13-2016), Giga (10-09-2016), 9nty (02-16-2016), Joyful- (01-27-2016), pi (09-17-2015), Sky (08-07-2015), Dont (06-29-2015), kana (02-03-2015), -Jonesyy (01-28-2015), Island-Time (08-18-2014), 21 (07-23-2014), Rodent (04-08-2014), basedtelli (03-21-2014), SLS (01-01-2014), Stedos (12-31-2013), DJMarkyMark (12-13-2013), Tyler (11-11-2013), Int (09-16-2013), Emazed (08-22-2013), Craig (08-10-2013), BigWes (07-16-2013), G_Man (05-21-2013), Appze (05-19-2013), JIF (05-19-2013), CMR (05-14-2013), MystbraiRush (05-12-2013), RBZ (05-12-2013), Churro- (05-12-2013), Champz (05-12-2013), Kyle93 (05-12-2013)
#2. Posted:
CMR
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 18, 201013Year Member
Posts: 1,609
Reputation Power: 73
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 18, 201013Year Member
Posts: 1,609
Reputation Power: 73
Sapphire Dual-X 7850 1GB


This is going to be a little review on the Sapphire 7850, 1GB model.

The system I use: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ] + an Antec VP 450p 450w power supply. Card is fully overclocked and over volted.

Manufacturer's Specification
[spoil]Display Support 3 x Maximum Display Monitor(s) support
Output 2 x Dual-Link DVI
1 x HDMI (with 3D)
1 x DisplayPort
GPU - 860 MHz Core Clock
28 nm Chip
1024 x Stream Processors
Video Memory - 256 -bit GDDR5
Dimension - 2 x slot card. 210(L)x105(W)x35(H) mm Size.

Software:

Driver CD

Accessories included:

CrossFire Bridge Interconnect Cable
DVI to VGA Adapter
6 PIN to 4 PIN Power Cable (Molex to 6 pin)
HDMI 1.4a high speed 1.8 meter cable(Full Retail SKU only)



Benchmarks
Here are some benchmarks @ stock levels. I know they say MSI, however it's only the cooling that is different.

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

AnAndTechs Benchmarks, for the 2GB Model.

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Overclocked Benchmarks

These are the settings used: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]



Unigine Valley Benchmark - Extreme HD preset
Stock Speeds: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Max Temperature = 60 Degrees C [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Overclocked with these settings: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Max Temperature = 67 Degrees C [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]



Benchmarked Temperatures, Noise and Power Consumption @ Stock Speeds

Bear in mind that these will not be the same as they do not have the same cooling. They are meant as a rough guide. Tomshardware benchmarking setup: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Temperatures:

Idle: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Load: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Noise

Idle: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Load: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Power Consumption

Idle [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Load: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Noises and their Decibel Level [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]



What it looks like

When mounted:

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

On its own:

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Compared to a DVD/CD:

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

View of the I/O:

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]



My Personal Opinion
Pros
  • Very quick and powerful for general 1080p gaming.
  • A very good price for what you get.
  • Overclocks EXTREMELY well. I've seen people getting it to stock speeds of 7950!
  • Awesome cooler. In auto mode, the fan keeps the temperature at 67 degrees. When playing with headphones on I use an aggressive fan profile which keeps them at 56 degrees under load.
Cons
  • 1GB does cause some FPS drops. Not a huge problem, and the only games I've encountered it on so far are on Far Cry 3, Blood Dragon and Crysis 3.
  • With the 660 price drop, the 7850 does seem a little bit overprice at the moment.


Overall it's a very good card. I'm very happy with it, and it does exactly what I need it to do. I don't consider myself a hardcore gamer. I've jut been playing Black Ops 2 because of the free multiplayer weekend and I was able to run it with everything on with a playable FPS.

Drivers are top notch, and not had a single problem with them.



How to Overclock this Graphics Card
I made a tutorial on how to overclock this card not so long ago. Feel free to check it out: Forums/t=5214307/beginners-guide-...x-gpu.html



Where To Buy

UK - [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
US - [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
CA - [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]



If you feel as though I've missed something, or want me to add something else, please do not hesitate to Private Message me. I'll add it as soon as I have the time.








Perixx MX 2000 Gaming Mouse











Perixx PX 1000 Gaming Keyboard




Updating with reviews of the following:

Perixx MX-2000 Gaming Mouse - In Process
Zalman Z11
Perixx PX-1000 Red Backlit Gaming Keyboard - In Process


I know the new layout of the post is a bit bizarre, but it was the only way I could get spoilers within a spoiler.

UPDATE 27/05/2013 - UK Format

Excuse the long wait, I'm super busy with packing and stuff. Moving from Spain to Wales. It'll be up soon!

UPDATE 07/09/2013 - UK Format

I'm finally getting round to doing it!

UPDATE 04/11/2013 - UK Format

Slow progress - I've got very little free time. Hopefully it'll be up soon! I'm ordering a new GPU too so I'll review that at the same time.


Last edited by CMR ; edited 4 times in total
#3. Posted:
Craig
  • V5 Launch
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 16, 201212Year Member
Posts: 20,271
Reputation Power: 17065
Motto: 2b || !2b
Motto: 2b || !2b
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 16, 201212Year Member
Posts: 20,271
Reputation Power: 17065
Motto: 2b || !2b
XFX AMD R7770 Super OC edition

Here is my review of the XFX R7770 Super OC Edition, 1GB GDDR5.

Here is my system, i know it's not the most up to date but it is getting an upgrade soon.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]


Specifications


Processor & Bus
Chipset version : ATI Radeon HD 7770
GPU Clock : 1120 MHz


Memory
Memory Bus : 128 bit
Memory Clock : 5.2 GHz
Memory Size : 1 GB
Memory Type : GDDR5


Features
AMD Eyefinity Technology : Yes
AMD HD3D Technology : Yes
AMD - CrossFire ready : Yes


Display Output
Display Port ready : 1.2
Dual link Support : Yes
HDMI Ready : 1.4a
Max Supported Resolution (ANALOG) : 2048 x 1536
Max Supported Resolution (DIGITAL) : 2560 x 1600
Output - Display Port : 1
Output - DL-DVI-I : 1
Output - HDMI : 1
Output - SL-DVI-D : 1


Physical Specs
Card Profile : Dual
Thermal Solution : Double Dissiaption with Ghost Cooling Technology
Thermal Type : Dual slot
Card Dimension (cm) : 22.5 x 11.12 x 3.81
Package Weight (Kg) : 1.07


Accessories Included
Cross Fire Bridge
Driver CD Installation Guide
DVI to VGA Adapter
Installation CD with Multi-Language User Guide
Quick Installation Guide
XFX BE badge
XFX Serial Number Door Hanger


Requirements
External Power - 6-pins : 1
Minimum Power Supply Requirement : 450 Watt (Although can be used will Corsair CM430)


Power Consumption

Power usage when idle: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Power usage when using a multi monitor setup: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Average power consumption: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Peak power consumption: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Maximum power consumption: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Blu-Ray power consumption: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]


Game Benchmarks
Please note: All these test are @ 1920x1200!!!

Battlefield 3: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Crysis: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Crysis 2: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
DiRT 3: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Call of Duty 4: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
The Elder Scrolls Skyrim: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

3D Mark 11: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Unigine Heaven 2.0: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]


What it looks like

Stock Images

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

What it looks like in the case
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]



Unigine Valley Benchmark 1.0

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]


GPU-Z
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]


Personal Thoughts!
I have had this card for just over a year, it hasn't let me down once. It plays every game i chuck at it and always performs well. Although saying that, it does struggle on the Frostbite Engine games (Battlefield 3, Crysis 3). Which is kind of understandable for a budget card. All I do is just turn the graphics settings down, and i average 35+ FPS on Battlefield 3 on medium.

I use this card with my 3 monitors in Eyefinity mode, it plays games like Ace Combat Assault Horizon and Just cause 2 across 3 monitors no problem at all, averaging around 40 FPS in those games @ 5760x1080.

I really do like this card and would recommend it to anyone building or upgrading a budget PC.

Features : 8/10
Performance for the price: 9/10
Multi Monitor performance: 8/10
Ease of setup and use: 10/10


Thank you for reading and hope this review helped in any way!





AMD A8-3870k APU

General Info!

Type: CPU or Microprocessor
Family: AMD A8-Series
Model Number: AMD A8-3870K
Frequency: 3000MHz
Package: 905-pin lidded micro-PGA package
AMD Package number: 31012
Socket: Socket FM1
Size: 1.57" x 1.57" / 4cm x 4cm
Introduction date Dec 20, 2011
Price at introduction: $135


Architecture

Microarchitecture: K10
Platform: Lynx
Processor core: Llano
Core stepping: LN1-B0
Data width 64 bit
The number of cores 4
The number of threads 4
Multiprocessing: Uniprocessor


Integrated Graphics
GPU Type: Radeon HD 6550D
Shader cores: 400
Base frequency (MHz): 600


Game Benchmarks
Left for dead 2: 1024x720 - [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Call of Duty: Black Ops: 1024x720 - [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Left for Dead 2: 1680x1050 - [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Call of Duty: Black Ops: 1680x1050 - [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Sorry these are the only benchmarks i could find in this layout!!!



Pictures

Stock Images
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

In the Motherboard!
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]


Test/Benchmarks

All tests are taken at stock clocks with stock cooler!!!

CPUID HWMonitor
Idle
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Under 100% Load
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]


CineBench
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]


CPU-Z
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]


Power Consumption
All tests were taken from this system!

2TB Western Digital Caviar Black hard disk
PC Power & Cooling Silencer 750W PSU
ASRock A75 Pro4 motherboard
4GB (2x 2GB) Corsair 1,600MHz DDR3 memory (CL9)
Titan Fenrir TTC-NK85TZ CPU cooler

Idle: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Under Load: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]


Personal Thoughts
I have been using this CPU/APU for over a year now, and to be quite honest it is the fastest computer i have had. (I only used laptops prior to this).

Since i have used it i have played various games on it's integrated GPU, and it didn't perform bad, but it wasn't great either. So after a few months i decided to invest in a better GPU the XFX R7770 (Review in Sticky of that too).

But since i upgraded the GPU, it has never let me down one bit. It never lags unless under a heavy load, i.e rendering video's. I have to say i am very impressed with this AMD APU as i bought it for just under 90 GBP, which isn't bad for this CPU, or in that case for any CPU it is quite cheap.

Overall speed: 7/10
Value for money: 9/10
Integrated GPU: 6/10
Power Consumption: 7/10
Overall: 7/10

Thanks for reading!





OCZ RevoDrive 100GB PCIe x4 SSD

Installing Windows 7
Installing Windows on this PCIe SSD wasn't going to be easy, as booting from a PCI slot always causes trouble. Some thing to do with the SCSI settings in the BIOS. It took me 4 attempts to install it, taking a day. I finally found out how to, by installing the separate drivers whilst in the Windows install menu's. It installs about twice as fast as my old Barracuda HDD, which is another bonus with SSD's.

Speeds
The transfer rates between the RevoDrive and a normal 7200RPM drive is quite fast, averaging over 60Mbps, SSD's are known to have fast OS boot times, and i can tell you, i wasn't sure about it before hand. But with this SSD it loads Windows 7 in about 8 seconds from a shut down state. Going through the BIOS screen too. When Windows loads, it is ready instantly, loading Google Chrome is so fast now. One of the bargains of the century this was.

Product
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
This is it, grab one while you can. It's a great addition to anyone's PC.



AMD FX 6300 CPU!



General info!


Type - CPU / Microprocessor
Market segment - Desktop
Family - AMD FX-Series
Model number - FX-6300
Frequency - 3500 MHz
Turbo frequency - 4100 MHz
Socket - AM3+
TDP - 95 Watts
Introduction date - October 23, 2012




Architecture


Microarchitecture - Piledriver
Platform - Volan
Processor core - Vishera
Core stepping - C0
Manufacturing process - 0.032 micron
Data width - 64 bit
The number of cores - 6
The number of threads - 6
Floating Point Unit - Integrated
Level 1 cache size - 3 x 64 KB shared instruction caches - 6 x 16 KB data caches
Level 2 cache size - 3 x 2 MB shared exclusive caches
Level 3 cache size - 8 MB shared cache




3D Gaming Performance


All tests below are tested @ 1650x1080.

Test System - [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Skyrim - [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Diablo 3 - [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Dragon Age Origins - [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Dawn of War II - [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
World of Warcraft - [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Starcraft II - [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]




Photoshop Performance


[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]




Pictures
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]




Personal Thoughts
I have been using the 6300 for little over 3 months now, and have tried many new things with it. Tha main reason i bought it in the first place, was to try overclocking. Since i had no previous experience i had a play around with a few settings in the Biosand sort of got to know my way round.
I mean don't get me wrong, I'm not a overclocking wizard who knows everything about voltage controls, because trust me. I don't. I currently have it clocked at a stable 4.2GHz on the stock voltage, as that is just above the Turbo's maximum speed. Overclocking takes time and pacience, 2 things i don't have.
But the 6300 has a great overall performace to price ratio, and comapred to my more expensive APU it blows it oout of the water where performance is concerned. My max temp is just over 30 degrees but that's because i have a Coolermaster Hyper 212 EVO sitting on top of it.

But to wrap this up without boring you to death, it is a great CPU and would recommend it to anyone and everyone as it cheap and gives out unbeatble performnce fpr the price.

Ratings
Performance - 9/10
Price - 10/10
Overclocking - 9/10
Overall - 9/10

]


Last edited by Craig ; edited 7 times in total
#4. Posted:
BigWes
  • TTG Addict
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 20, 201112Year Member
Posts: 2,167
Reputation Power: 103
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 20, 201112Year Member
Posts: 2,167
Reputation Power: 103
||Hyper 212 EVO Heatsink Review||

Benchmarks:
RealTemp: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ] , 2500k 4.3Ghz playing Flight Simulator X maxed out ect.

CPU-Z: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ] Temperature again, stable overclock



Hardware Picture:

Mounted on the Motherboard: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Standalone: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]



Review:
What a great aftermarket heat-sink and fan! It performs amazingly well with an overclocked cpu, as well as cooling a cpu with stock speeds. It will fit well in almost any case as it is relatively small compared to other competitors. Extremely quiet under 750 rpm, over that it tends to be a noticeable sound. It also features a cool sleek design! A disappointing factor with buying this is that it comes with one Cooler Master 120mm fan, but don't fret you can buy another fan separately for around $10 USD. All in all this heat sink is a must have for any buyers looking for a cheap cpu fan that offers them the best cooling for the price!
#5. Posted:
Tyler
  • V5 Launch
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 28, 201212Year Member
Posts: 3,219
Reputation Power: 463
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 28, 201212Year Member
Posts: 3,219
Reputation Power: 463
GeForce GTX 780 Video Card

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]




Review

Credit given to [ Register or Signin to view external links. ] (This is a longer review)(I am taking all they posted for your information only!)

Longer Review:
Looking at the launch of the GeForce GTX 780 in retrospect, one of the more unusual aspects of the 780 was just how close NVIDIA let their lower-tier GK110 card get to the upper-tier GTX Titan. GTX 780 was able to deliver 90% of GTX Titans performance, but did so at just 65% of the price of GTX Titan.

Now a 10% performance gap is a fairly common gap for high-end NVIDIA cards. The price gap on the other hand is clearly wider than normal. For example, in the last generation the GTX 680 and GTX 670 were separated by roughly the same performance gap, but the GTX 670 came in at 80% the price of the GTX 680, not 65%. Ultimately NVIDIAs prosumer positioning made Titan a very expensive card for gaming, with the end result being that the more strictly gaming focused GTX 780 could deliver very similar performance at a much lower price tag.

But the more interesting outcome of this performance/price disparity is how easy it is to close the performance gap against the much more expensive GTX Titan through overclocking. In the big picture 10% between tiers is almost nothing, and as weve already seen GTX 780 can more than make up that last 10% in overclocking. NVIDIAs partners are of course well aware of this fact, and as the partners traditionally do, factory overclocked cards were a foregone conclusion. And with such a narrow gap between GTX 780 and GTX Titan, those factory overclocked cards should have little trouble matching GTX Titan.

Today were taking a quick look at one of those cards, EVGAs GeForce GTX 780 Superclocked ACX. The 780SC ACX is a fairly traditional card for EVGA, filling in as the companys standard first-tier factory overclocked card. With the GTX 780 Superclocked EVGA has rolled out two variations of this card, the first variation being an overclocked version of the reference card, and the latter being a semi-custom design with the companys new ACX cooler.

Touching briefly upon the specifications of the 780SC ACX, the card is a fairly by-the-books factory overclock. EVGA has jumped the core clock from the GTX 780s standard 863MHz to 967MHz, a 104MHz (12%) core clock increase. The official boost clock grows by even more 120Mhz over reference to 1020MHz. Memory clockspeeds on the other hand remain unchanged, leaving the card at 6GHz, making this a somewhat unbalanced overclock. However it's also one thats largely tempered by the fact that the 384-bit wide memory bus of the GTX 780 provides plenty of bandwidth; after all this is the same amount of memory bandwidth GTX Titan has in the first place. The end result is that with few games being memory bandwidth limited, the 780SC ACX should scale nicely with clockspeeds.

EVGAs design is a semi-custom design, pairing a standard reference board with their ACX cooler. Getting to the cooler momentarily, the board is otherwise unremarkable compared to other GTX 780s. The same voltage and power limitations apply here, so next to the factory overclock itself the biggest gains for the 780SC ACX come from the customary binning and reprogramming these cards go through. This means that the 780SC ACX runs at higher clockspeeds for any given voltage on the curve, improving performance without significantly increasing power consumption.

Moving on we have EVGAs new ACX cooler, which is as much the star of the show for todays review as the factory overclock itself is. EVGA isnt a stranger to custom coolers, but their strongest hands have traditionally been their superbly supported reference cards, and their niche-in-a-niche products such as their Hydro Copper cards with pre-installed waterblocks or their extremely high-end Classified cards, neither of which is quite as mass market. EVGA has also offered alternative coolers at various points, but never as a principle product line.

However with their ACX cooler EVGA is looking to change that by branching to whats loosely defined as the branded custom cooler market. This is a market which has seen the likes of Gigabyte, MSI, and others make a solid name for themselves by offering semi-custom and custom cards with branded coolers such as their respective Windforce and Twin Frozr coolers. Custom coolers are obviously by no means new, but the branding and reuse of the basic designs of these coolers have allowed the partners to make their coolers signature products for their respective brands in order to better stand out against both reference designs and competitors cards. Invariably open air coolers in design, these coolers offer a fairly well understood alternative to the blower designs most high-end reference coolers use, ultimately allowing partners to serve the preferences of buyers at both ends of the spectrum.

With that in mind, EVGAs ACX cooler is a fairly typical entry for the custom cooler market, being based in principle in a twin fan open air cooler. This means were looking at a three part design: a baseplate for rigidity and heatsinking of smaller components, a heatsink that runs nearly the entire length of the card and is attached to the GPU via five aluminum heatpipes and an aluminum baseplate, and finally a pair of 90mm fans to provide airflow over the entire card. All in all its a common design principle for high end cards these days thanks in large part due to the laws of physics but its a common design that has proven to work well and makes some very straightforward and well understood tradeoffs in cooling performance versus noise. An open air cooler should deliver equal or better temperatures at lower noise levels, at the cost of shoving more of the cooling workload onto the chassis itself.

Meanwhile, though the basic design principles of the ACX cooler may be common, EVGA has a lot of latitude when it comes to construction, and this is where theyre hoping to separate themselves in the crowded field of branded custom coolers by building a better twin fan cooler. EVGAs secret sauce here is largely in the design of their fans, with EVGA taking care to point out the design choices they made for both the blades and the motors. With respect to the blades EVGA says theyre using blades that are both stronger and lighter than what we typically see, though we dont have the data the confirm this.

What should be more significant is EVGAs use of ball bearings in the fan motors. Ball bearing fans are no more a breakthrough than twin fan coolers, however bearings are a seldom promoted item and as a result we rarely know what type of bearings are in use or when manufacturers switch between the bearing types. So consistently using ball bearings on all of their ACX coolers is if nothing else a promotional point for EVGA, as theyre a more expensive/premium option than sleeve bearings. Mechanically speaking, compared to sleeve bearings, ball bearings typically have greater longevity and a bit less noise under heavy load, in exchange for a bit more noise at idle, making them a good tradeoff for a high-end card. From a practical point of view the longer lifespan of ball bearings will be the greatest gain out of this, while any noise tradeoffs are secondary as the fan itself will usually be the greater factor. Of course EVGAs specific numbers arent something we can validate, but the general benefits are fairly straightforward.

Moving on, as a semi-custom card the 780SC ACX is otherwise identical to the reference GTX 780. This means it has the standard NVIDIA display I/O configuration of 2x DL-DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort 1.2, and the same 10.5 length. Even the official TDP is the same at 250W, though as well see in our testing there is a slight increase in power consumption at the wall.

Rounding out the package is EVGAs usual collection of software and hardware accessories, including a pair of PCIe power adapters and a DVI to VGA adapter. As far as EVGAs software goes theres little to be said that we havent said before: EVGA still shares the gold standard for software, with their fantastic Precision X overclocking utility and their OC Scanner X artifact scanning utility.

Meanwhile, as with all of EVGAs North American cards, the 780SC ACX comes with EVGAs standard 3 year transferable warranty, with individual 2 or 7 year extensions available for purchase upon registration, which will also unlock access to EVGAs step-up upgrade program. Finally, the MSRP on the card is $659, only $10 above the MSRP for the standard GTX 780. Though GTX 780 base pricing is by no means cheap, as well see in our benchmarks $10 (2%) more for a 12% overclock and Titan-like performance renders the stock GTX 780 redundant almost immediately.


Shorter (Common Joe Review)

Basically for 90% performance of the titan and 65% of the price you can have the exact same card, But overclocking can put the card right next to GTX Titan in the benchmarks!
(See wasn't that simple)




Specs & Benchmarks:

specs:
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
benchmarks
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]


Final runthrough:

Working in the business for a couple years now and having decent experience with this card I will personally say I recommend this card with duals for the PERFECT setup. Granted that is over $1200 and most cannot afford that, but for $650 this card is a very nice choice. The BIOS are very easy to configure and install, Overclocking this card it does give off more heat and noise (obviously) but to get that extra 10% to keep in pace with the titan I will say it was worth it.

***Give your own personal opinion! I want to hear others success with this specific card***
#6. Posted:
Craig
  • Spooky Poster
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 16, 201212Year Member
Posts: 20,271
Reputation Power: 17065
Motto: 2b || !2b
Motto: 2b || !2b
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 16, 201212Year Member
Posts: 20,271
Reputation Power: 17065
Motto: 2b || !2b
Sapphire R9 270X Dual-X Boost GPU
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Specs
Core Clock: 1020MHz
Chip spec: 28nm
Stream processors: 1280
VRAM: 2048MB GDDR5
Memory bus: 256-Bit
Memory Clock: 5600MHz
Output: (HDMI = 1) ( Display port = 1) (DVI-I = 1) (DVI-D = 1)
Eyefinity Support: Yes
Power: 2 x 6 Pin PCIe Connectors




Pictures

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]





Performance
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Power Consumption
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Overclocking
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]




Personal Overview
This 270X is the most powerful card I've ever owned, so I'm going to mark it highly for being reasonably cheap and very powerful. I have not found a game yet that i can't play on at least High detail @ 1080p and achieve 50FPS +.
Crysis 3 is one of the hardest games to run on any GPU, and I can tell you, it turns my PC into a make shift oven. The card is hitting temp of around 70 degrees C. I bought this GPU for 155GBP around 2 weeks after it's release.
So i was expecting driver issues and/or some minor hardware ones. And i have got to be honest, i have found none. Sapphire provided the new Beta drivers that support the R7 & R9 cards in the box so doing that was easy as peas.

Without boring you to tears, I'm gonna wrap this up now. But before i do i just want to say this. People may say they're just re-branded Radeon cards, and they may be right (which they technically are) but the R9 series bring a lot of new features
that will help you achieve max FPS in games. Mantle is still waiting to be introduced, and i cannot wait to see what it brings.




Overall
Price/Performance: 9/10
Gaming ability: 8/10
Features: 9/10
Looks: 10/10 (Dual-X has always been my favourite cooler)

I love this card, and am thinking of Crossfiring it with another. I will update this in the near future when mantle has been released!
#7. Posted:
Craig
  • Rated Awesome
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 16, 201212Year Member
Posts: 20,271
Reputation Power: 17065
Motto: 2b || !2b
Motto: 2b || !2b
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 16, 201212Year Member
Posts: 20,271
Reputation Power: 17065
Motto: 2b || !2b
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Fractal Design Define R4 Black Pearl Windowed Edition




The Define R4 is really one of mt all time favorite cases, it has striking looks and brilliant features. Lets start with the exterior of the case, it has a front panel door which is brilliant not only for looks, but it hides the 5.25 inch drive bay covers, these can be ugly at the best of time. So keeping them hidden improves the looks. The door also contains noise dampening foam to keep the noise from the 2 140mm fans down. The features behind the door are pretty nice too, there is 2 push clips that drop the fan guard down so you can clean the dust filter and fans if needed. Also behind the door you'll find 2 5.25 inch drive bays to house your DVD drive and/or fan controller, but i cannot see a fan controller being needed as the R4 has one built in. It has spaces for 3 fans or more if using fan splitters. The fan controller support 5V, 7V and 12V. Moving onto the left side, the R4 comes in 2 varieties, Windowed or with just a 140mm fan mount. I have the windowed version, the side panel also contains noise dampening foam to cut the noise and vibrations down even more. Now onto the back, It hold 7 PCI slot covers and and extra vertical slot for either a fan controller or anything you can can find really. The back also holds either a 120mm or 140mm fan for intake or exhausting air. The top has more fan mount for either 120mm or 140mm fans, but also has radiator support for i.e a Corsair H100 for optimal cooling options. The inside is where it really divides itself from the rest. It comes with 2 pre installed 140mm Fractal Design Silent R2 fans, for optimal cooling and silence. It supports mATX or standard ATX motherboards for nice compatibility options. The 2 top fan mounts come pre installed with ModuVents, if you don't know what these are, they are soft foam squares that dampen noise and keep dust from falling into the PC when fans are not installed. All together the R4 can hold 6 case fans (2 front, 2 top, 1 bottom, 1 back) but these are not really needed unless you are running a setup which needs MEGA cooling. The great thing about the internal layout of this case, is that you can remove the top HDD bay for better air flow through the case, which i really like as then the fans don't have to work so hard. The nice part, is that you can actually turn it around so you can still use them, but the airflow is still a lot lot better. The R4 can hold up to 8 3.5inch drives or 10 2.5inch drives as the standard mounts support both 3.5 and 2.5 inch drive designs. There is also 2 2.5inch drive mounts on the back of the motherboard tray.

The front I/O is quite plain really, but it has what you need. It comes with Headphone Microphone ports along with 2 USB2.0 ports and 2 USB3.0 ports. With the Power and reset buttons.




This case really shines through in my eyes, but it does come at a price. It is quite an expensive PC case, but it is so worth every penny.




Pictures:
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]





Professional Overview:
#8. Posted:
Adam
  • Retired Staff
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 10, 201112Year Member
Posts: 6,058
Reputation Power: 30859
Motto: :Salt:
Motto: :Salt:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 10, 201112Year Member
Posts: 6,058
Reputation Power: 30859
Motto: :Salt:
AMD FX 8320


Specifications about the 8320
General information

Type CPU / Microprocessor
Market segment Desktop
Family AMD FX-Series
Model number ? FX-8320
Frequency ? 3500 MHz
Turbo frequency 4000 MHz
Boosted P states [1] #1: 4000 MHz, 1.425V
#2: 3700 MHz, 1.4125V
Bus speed ? One 2600 MHz 16-bit HyperTransport link
Package 938-pin micro-PGA package
Socket Socket AM3+
Weight [1] 1.4oz / 38.4g (CPU)
1lb 5.6oz / 612.2g (box)
Fan/heatsink AV-Z7UH40Q001
Introduction date October 23, 2012


Architecture / Microarchitecture

Microarchitecture Piledriver
Platform Volan
Processor core ? Vishera
Core stepping ? C0
CPUID 600F20
Manufacturing process 0.032 micron
Data width 64 bit
The number of cores 8
The number of threads 8
Floating Point Unit Integrated
Level 1 cache size ? 4 x 64 KB shared instruction caches
8 x 16 KB data caches
Level 2 cache size ? 4 x 2 MB shared exclusive caches
Level 3 cache size 8 MB shared cache


Benchmarks
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]


My views

Good points

Amazing for value. This CPU currently costs 108GBP/$156 This is great value for what your getting from it

Great potential. This CPU is clocked at 3.5Ghz with 4.0Ghz turbo. This is great but it has so much more you can do with it. I currently have mine stable at 4.6Ghz

Gaming! This CPU is great for simple tasks like surfing the internet, Skypeing but is also capable of playing high end games such as Battlefield 4. BF4 loves the amount of cores the CPU has to offer which means better performance

Bad points


HEAT!
and lots of it ( When overclocked )This CPU heat output is manageable at stock speeds. You can put an air cooler on it and not have to worry about it. BUT, if you overclock it, be weary about the temperatures that this CPU can generate. I currently have modded my case so i have much better cooling for the CPU and its running on water! I have to keep a constant eye on the temperatures when playing BF4 in case it rises too much.

Conclusion
I really love this CPU. I like the fact that it was cheap to buy and still has amazing capabilities. It really does make my system a gem. I was really happy that I could do anything with my CPU and it would not fail on me. For example, I had BF4 running in the background and i was in a game not in the menus. The game was finishing soon so i booted up League Of Legends. I logged in to that and started a game! The CPU could handle 2 games running at the same time! More and more games now are finding ways to utilize cores to better performance and having them 8 cores will help. I'm not saying its future proof, but i'm not expecting to upgrade my CPU for another 2-3 maybe 4 years.

This CPU is great for budget builders and for people to realize that you can buy a cheap CPU and not have to worry about it being "bottlenecked"


Last edited by Adam ; edited 1 time in total
#9. Posted:
Craig
  • Discord Elite
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 16, 201212Year Member
Posts: 20,271
Reputation Power: 17065
Motto: 2b || !2b
Motto: 2b || !2b
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 16, 201212Year Member
Posts: 20,271
Reputation Power: 17065
Motto: 2b || !2b
Acer C720 Chromebook
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Now, before I start, Chromebooks are not for everyone, if you need to use programs and other everyday tasks on a laptop, then get a Windows laptop, because ChromeOS limits you to what you can do, apart from browse the web and type up documents, you cannot do much else. I mean you can play 'some' web based browser games, but they cannot need Java, as ChromeOS doesn't support Java at all. Anyway, not I have that out of the way, lets start the review.

I have been looking around for a laptop for a while now as a secondary to my main Gaming rig, I need something that i can use while laying in bed or to use on the go. I had looked at other Windows based laptops, but the specs included with them were really terrible. Windows laptops need better specs than Chromebooks as Windows OS requires faster processors and RAM speeds. With ChromeOS 2GB of RAM and a Intel Celeron CPU is lightning fast due to the OS being very very easy and light to run. So if you're looking for a cheap, small & relatively cute laptop, this thing is for you. Now, like i said before, don't get this as your primary computer as you'll only be disappointed. The C720 is one of the cheapest versions of the Chromebook which really baffles me, it contains one of the better processors Chromebooks currently offer, the Haswell based Celeron runs @ 1.4GHz which doesn't sound to impressive, but my got it's so fast. This is also helped by the 16GB SSD, The C720 boasts about it booting in 7 seconds, I timed this on the first ever boot up and it completed it 6.89 Seconds, which made my bottom lip drop. Not even my quad core smartphone boots that quickly. So for fast, quiet operation, this thing is for you. The keyboard is of very very high quality and seems to be perfect for fast typers, I don't really notice myself making many mistakes when typing on the C720. The overall feel and build quality is very impressive also, for the 200GBP it cost me, my parents laptop seems like a complete rip off. On to the screen, it isn't the best quality I've ever seen, but for the price, you cannot expect more. It measures 11.6" diagonally with a resolution of 1366x768, the standard for most cheap laptops, some of the colours are a bit dull in low light, but when watching video's the transitions are super smooth.

To sum it all up though, Chromebooks are unbeatable for the price, but you need to use them for the reasons they were intended for. If you're looking for a laptop that blasts through editing and rendering tasks, look elsewhere. So if you're looking for an inexpensive laptop for web browsing and word editing, you will not go wrong with the C720.

Pictures:
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]


Pros and Cons:

Pros:
Very low profile laptop.
Price, it is one of the cheapest laptops on sale
ChromeOS - Very lightweight OS
Very decent clear display.
Very thin and very light.
Battery life is around 8 hours
USB3.0 instead of USB2.0
Comes in different variations and colours.
100GB Free Google Drive


Cons:
Cannot run or open .exe files
Keyboard feels cheap
Small SSD space.


Final Score:
8/10


Last edited by Craig ; edited 1 time in total
#10. Posted:
DiamondDoctor
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 25, 201311Year Member
Posts: 1,028
Reputation Power: 47
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 25, 201311Year Member
Posts: 1,028
Reputation Power: 47
Tonight, i'll be reviewing my first part, my Phanteks TC14PE CPU coooler ( [ Register or Signin to view external links. ] )

This cooler, first of all, is freakin huge, it's probably at least a pound, and even in my massive full tower case, still takes up a lot of room.

Mounting the Cooler was rather difficult, due to the instructions being pretty unclear, and the fact that the BOX says it's 1150 socket compatible, but the MANUAL does not.

it is, mounted with my i5-4690k, i've had the HeavyLoad putting it on all four cores, 100% for 15min now, and it has only hit 58c
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

This cooler is absolutely worth the money and time, the cooling abilities are phenomenal, but i'm sure a liquid cooling system would get better cooling overall performance, but for those of you (like me) who don't quite trust liquids and 1,100 worth of components together, the Phanteks TC14PE cooler is a great choice, if you're willing to drop the money for it.
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.