You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
this may confuse you guys
Posted:
this may confuse you guysPosted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 27, 201211Year Member
Posts: 161
Reputation Power: 6
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 27, 201211Year Member
Posts: 161
Reputation Power: 6
i have been holding this in for a while but i have a theory of my own every emobodyment that takes up space has atleast 1 paradox or more and what we live every day is this we have our outer body which is our physical embodyment then we have our inside embodyment
so say if it is day time in our physical embodyment and it is night time in our spiritual embodyment what im trying to say is we share a .000000000000000000000001 ratio with everything in existance and i do say it is pretty cool
so say if it is day time in our physical embodyment and it is night time in our spiritual embodyment what im trying to say is we share a .000000000000000000000001 ratio with everything in existance and i do say it is pretty cool
#2. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 17, 201211Year Member
Posts: 35
Reputation Power: 1
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 17, 201211Year Member
Posts: 35
Reputation Power: 1
I think I would understand if you had actual grammar in this, explained where you get your ratios from and what you mean by 'inner and outer embodiment'.
- 2useful
- 1not useful
#3. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 22, 201211Year Member
Posts: 676
Reputation Power: 28
Misanthrope wrote I think I would understand if you had actual grammar in this, explained where you get your ratios from and what you mean by 'inner and outer embodiment'.
'had actual grammar'? Nice try, grammar Nazi!
- 1useful
- 5not useful
#4. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 17, 201211Year Member
Posts: 35
Reputation Power: 1
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 17, 201211Year Member
Posts: 35
Reputation Power: 1
xSkillzUK wroteMisanthrope wrote I think I would understand if you had actual grammar in this, explained where you get your ratios from and what you mean by 'inner and outer embodiment'.
'had actual grammar'? Nice try, grammar Nazi!
Umm, yes.
'had actual grammar in this' refers to the text.
Not 'used actual grammar' which refers to the poster.
Point stands.
- 5useful
- 3not useful
#5. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 27, 201211Year Member
Posts: 161
Reputation Power: 6
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 27, 201211Year Member
Posts: 161
Reputation Power: 6
it is a forum you idiot mornic ****
- 0useful
- 1not useful
#6. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 27, 201211Year Member
Posts: 161
Reputation Power: 6
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 27, 201211Year Member
Posts: 161
Reputation Power: 6
Misanthrope wroteand if you don't like me just GTFO. and my point stands or else we may have problemsxSkillzUK wroteMisanthrope wrote I think I would understand if you had actual grammar in this, explained where you get your ratios from and what you mean by 'inner and outer embodiment'.
'had actual grammar'? Nice try, grammar Nazi!
Umm, yes.
'had actual grammar in this' refers to the text.
Not 'used actual grammar' which refers to the poster.
Point stands.
- 0useful
- 2not useful
#7. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 17, 201211Year Member
Posts: 1,094
Reputation Power: 47
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 17, 201211Year Member
Posts: 1,094
Reputation Power: 47
You shouldnt have called him a grammar nazi then.
- 2useful
- 0not useful
#8. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 07, 201212Year Member
Posts: 770
Reputation Power: 31
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 07, 201212Year Member
Posts: 770
Reputation Power: 31
HDZeropuv wroteMisanthrope wroteand if you don't like me just GTFO. and my point stands or else we may have problemsxSkillzUK wroteMisanthrope wrote I think I would understand if you had actual grammar in this, explained where you get your ratios from and what you mean by 'inner and outer embodiment'.
'had actual grammar'? Nice try, grammar Nazi!
Umm, yes.
'had actual grammar in this' refers to the text.
Not 'used actual grammar' which refers to the poster.
Point stands.
Badass alert badass alert!
- 3useful
- 0not useful
#9. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 27, 201211Year Member
Posts: 161
Reputation Power: 6
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 27, 201211Year Member
Posts: 161
Reputation Power: 6
Unauthorized wrote You shouldnt have called him a grammar nazi then.who cares if someones a grammar nazi or comeplete idiot who cares just please stay on topic
- 0useful
- 1not useful
#10. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 17, 201211Year Member
Posts: 35
Reputation Power: 1
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 17, 201211Year Member
Posts: 35
Reputation Power: 1
HDZeropuv wroteMisanthrope wroteand if you don't like me just GTFO. and my point stands or else we may have problemsxSkillzUK wroteMisanthrope wrote I think I would understand if you had actual grammar in this, explained where you get your ratios from and what you mean by 'inner and outer embodiment'.
'had actual grammar'? Nice try, grammar Nazi!
Umm, yes.
'had actual grammar in this' refers to the text.
Not 'used actual grammar' which refers to the poster.
Point stands.
You might not think that good grammar matters when its just 'on a forum'.
I'm proving that it does.
I couldn't understand where one point finished and another one started.
I'm sorry if I sounded like I was having a go at you.
But really, I couldn't give a damn if you like me or not.
- 1useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.