You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
Does 9/11 seem a little strange Fact Wise?
Posted:

Does 9/11 seem a little strange Fact Wise?Posted:

XeDragHD
  • V5 Launch
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 06, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,055
Reputation Power: 42
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 06, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,055
Reputation Power: 42
I have been watching some videos on 9/11 and have some beliefs on it.

Read if you want, might change your perspective of 9/11
If you do not care if it changes your perspective, please read & respond with your belief!
1. Why is our emergency number 911? It was chosen before 9/11 about 40 years ago.
2. Why are there blasts before the ripples in videos of the towers collapsing?

3. Why wasn't there a big investigation?

4. Why was there a bombing in the Level B Parking Garage in 1993?

5. Prior to the above, did they rebuild/restrengthen the structure?
(That could be a possible reason of it collapsing)

6. Why was there some form of Flowing Molten after the plane/s hit?

7. Why did WTC 7 collapse, with steel frame & fall straight down similar to a controlled demo?

8. Why did people in the lobby say they heard a blast and many people were effected in the lobby?
(Also, why did it look like a "BOMB" went off inside?)

9. Why did many people say it sounded like explosions?

10. The pentagon, there wasn't any sign of a plane and the damage was to small to be a plane.
(Rumored to be shot by a missle or hit by a drone)

11. What do you think the truth of 9/11 is?


RIP 9/11 Victims
Never Forget..

The following 3 users thanked XeDragHD for this useful post:

vSamuraiSanosuke (10-04-2012), BAN3 (10-03-2012), Teemo (09-26-2012)
#2. Posted:
Nazareth
  • New Member
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 23, 201211Year Member
Posts: 27
Reputation Power: 3
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 23, 201211Year Member
Posts: 27
Reputation Power: 3
Well i have always believed there has been something more to it , but you don't want to be too ignorant about it like ... all those people that had to suffer in the building's

R.I.P
#3. Posted:
SSDeathcard
  • Powerhouse
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 04, 201014Year Member
Posts: 476
Reputation Power: 18
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 04, 201014Year Member
Posts: 476
Reputation Power: 18
Well the reason for the bomb in the bottom parking garage was done by terrorist trying to bring down the building from the bottom. Then bin laden had his architects discovered that you have to bring it down from the top because of all the weight.
#4. Posted:
XeDragHD
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 06, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,055
Reputation Power: 42
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 06, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,055
Reputation Power: 42
I agree with both of you
Thank you for sharing and thank you for giving me that information, I just found out about the bombing in 1993 today.
Here's some rep, & goodnight.


RIP 9/11 Victims
Never Forget..
#5. Posted:
RonHost
  • Powerhouse
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 15, 201211Year Member
Posts: 448
Reputation Power: 18
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 15, 201211Year Member
Posts: 448
Reputation Power: 18
Well, for some things just can't be done, Most likely the terrorist that claimed to do this purposely did it on 9/11 almost to mock us. As for the controlled demo thing, well that is almost impossible because from what I know about a controlled demo is it takes months to plan, and with a building that size, it would take even longer, who's to say a guy didn't see something and tell his wife,sister,aunt,ect. Plus if they had been working on it for months, it would require a lot of people that would be going in and out putting explosives in walls,floors,ect. Lastly a plane crashing into a building could sound like an explosion. But I don't know for sure. For the rest it's a mystery.
#6. Posted:
XeDragHD
  • V5 Launch
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 06, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,055
Reputation Power: 42
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 06, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,055
Reputation Power: 42
RonHost wrote Well, for some things just can't be done, Most likely the terrorist that claimed to do this purposely did it on 9/11 almost to mock us. As for the controlled demo thing, well that is almost impossible because from what I know about a controlled demo is it takes months to plan, and with a building that size, it would take even longer. Plus if they had been working on it for months, it would require a lot of people that would be going in and out putting explosives in walls,floors,ect. Lastly a plane crashing into a building could sound like an explosion. But I don't know for sure. For the rest it's a mystery.

The building that looked similar to a controlled demolition is World Trade Center 7.
Take a look at this video(A few seconds long):

Did you notice it appears to fall from the inside and kinda cave in on itself?
This is what I mean by a controlled demo, it didn't fall over.
#7. Posted:
Mascot
  • TTG Master
Status: Offline
Joined: May 06, 201113Year Member
Posts: 832
Reputation Power: 37
Status: Offline
Joined: May 06, 201113Year Member
Posts: 832
Reputation Power: 37
Wow. Nice post never thought about it like that only the 911 as the emergency number
#8. Posted:
Yin
  • 2 Million
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 30, 201212Year Member
Posts: 5,468
Reputation Power: 245
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 30, 201212Year Member
Posts: 5,468
Reputation Power: 245
RonHost wrote Well, for some things just can't be done, Most likely the terrorist that claimed to do this purposely did it on 9/11 almost to mock us. As for the controlled demo thing, well that is almost impossible because from what I know about a controlled demo is it takes months to plan, and with a building that size, it would take even longer, who's to say a guy didn't see something and tell his wife,sister,aunt,ect. Plus if they had been working on it for months, it would require a lot of people that would be going in and out putting explosives in walls,floors,ect. Lastly a plane crashing into a building could sound like an explosion. But I don't know for sure. For the rest it's a mystery.

They had years to plan this. There were unmarked vans that would show up and leave in the middle of the night when no one was at the Trade Centers. This went on everyday for about a month. They also had some "renovations" going on at the time. The plane would sound like an explosion, true, but it was when the tower collapsed 30 minutes later that sounded like bombs going off. Firefighters also told people to stay clear because bombs were in the building. The towers were strengthened at the top and it showed. It shouldn't have collapsed. The fire for the most part was burnt out and then it just decides to crumble ontop of itself? That isn't scientifically possible without help of some bombs. It fell as fast as gravity. There is no way there was zero resistance from the top to the bottom without bombs. The main beams had to have been destroyed in multiple places.
#9. Posted:
Trans_Am
  • V5 Launch
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 17, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,838
Reputation Power: 131
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 17, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,838
Reputation Power: 131
Does everyone forget about the jet fuel in the plane.

Here is what happen on a 5th grade level.

Plane crashes into building, Gas tank leaks, Gas pours thousands of gallons of jet fuel (witch is super heated metal burning stuff) down the building, it ignites, and boom chain reaction.

Not many know about this or will accept it ^^
Enjoy
#10. Posted:
Yin
  • E3 2017
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 30, 201212Year Member
Posts: 5,468
Reputation Power: 245
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 30, 201212Year Member
Posts: 5,468
Reputation Power: 245
Obsidian wrote Does everyone forget about the jet fuel in the plane.

Here is what happen on a 5th grade level.

Plane crashes into building, Gas tank leaks, Gas pours thousands of gallons of jet fuel (witch is super heated metal burning stuff) down the building, it ignites, and boom chain reaction.

Not many know about this or will accept it ^^
Enjoy

All the way to the bottom? Really? If it even was to get hot enough to melt, the beams would have warped and the building would have fell sideways. Most of the fuel exploded and burned on impact. The building was sitting there for 30 minutes without any problems (besides the giant hole of course.) I am sure the fuel would have been long gone after 30 minutes of burning, and then the building falls in a demolition fashion (right down in it's own footprint.) No science would agree to the jet fuel theory given the evidence shown.
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.