You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
Possible Theory Of Teleportation
Posted:
Possible Theory Of TeleportationPosted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 02, 201013Year Member
Posts: 2,244
Reputation Power: 89
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 02, 201013Year Member
Posts: 2,244
Reputation Power: 89
So basically you could "teleport" by "switching" dimensions.
We are currently in Third-Dimension space, so by being the thired-dimesion you could be "lifted" out of this one, into fourth-dimension space, and then "placed" back.
To explain this better, I have created this example:
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
This is a flat board with borders, with a coin in the middle.
Say we could only see two-dimesional space, we would see this coin. If we wanted to move the coin out of the board, it would be impossible. As in two-dimensional space there is no height. So there is no way around this.
Unless a person who exists in third-dimensional space just simply picks up the coin and places it outside the board. To a person who exists in two-dimensional space the coin would appear to "disappear" creating the illusion that it had just disappeared and reappeared at another location, thus "teleport".
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
A being in two-dimensional space would have no concept of height. So a being in 3D space would just lift the coin higher.
-
Now think of this exact example, but a dimension higher.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
There is a marble in a sealed 3D box. To us in the third-dimension, it is impossible for this object to go outside the box, much like how a 2D being couldn't move the coin outside the board.
So in four-dimensional space, there might be a way to move a 3D object out of the box, but because we can't see into the fourth-dimension, we can't comprehend even how this happens.
So if this did happen, the object would be "lifted" from 3D space, to 4D and "placed" back to 3D space, thus giving again the illusion of teleportation.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
We wouldn't be able to see the transition of the object being moved.
--
So is this how teleportation works? That it just goes a dimension higher? so it gets "lifted" from y-dimesion, moves about within x-dimesions laws and being placed back into y-dimension?
If I didn't explain myself properally, or it doesn't make sense. I apologize as I rushed this really badly.
Thoughts?
We are currently in Third-Dimension space, so by being the thired-dimesion you could be "lifted" out of this one, into fourth-dimension space, and then "placed" back.
To explain this better, I have created this example:
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
This is a flat board with borders, with a coin in the middle.
Say we could only see two-dimesional space, we would see this coin. If we wanted to move the coin out of the board, it would be impossible. As in two-dimensional space there is no height. So there is no way around this.
Unless a person who exists in third-dimensional space just simply picks up the coin and places it outside the board. To a person who exists in two-dimensional space the coin would appear to "disappear" creating the illusion that it had just disappeared and reappeared at another location, thus "teleport".
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
A being in two-dimensional space would have no concept of height. So a being in 3D space would just lift the coin higher.
-
Now think of this exact example, but a dimension higher.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
There is a marble in a sealed 3D box. To us in the third-dimension, it is impossible for this object to go outside the box, much like how a 2D being couldn't move the coin outside the board.
So in four-dimensional space, there might be a way to move a 3D object out of the box, but because we can't see into the fourth-dimension, we can't comprehend even how this happens.
So if this did happen, the object would be "lifted" from 3D space, to 4D and "placed" back to 3D space, thus giving again the illusion of teleportation.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
We wouldn't be able to see the transition of the object being moved.
--
So is this how teleportation works? That it just goes a dimension higher? so it gets "lifted" from y-dimesion, moves about within x-dimesions laws and being placed back into y-dimension?
If I didn't explain myself properally, or it doesn't make sense. I apologize as I rushed this really badly.
Thoughts?
The following 1 user thanked SovietGnome for this useful post:
CWF (09-19-2012)
#2. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 15, 201013Year Member
Posts: 1,138
Reputation Power: 45
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 15, 201013Year Member
Posts: 1,138
Reputation Power: 45
This actually makes sense.
nice post
nice post
- 4useful
- 0not useful
#3. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 16, 201212Year Member
Posts: 550
Reputation Power: 21
Status: Offline
Joined: May 16, 201212Year Member
Posts: 550
Reputation Power: 21
read it what i got bored half way through with the coin and that to confusing but nice post well done for the effot:)
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#4. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 02, 201013Year Member
Posts: 432
Reputation Power: 19
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 02, 201013Year Member
Posts: 432
Reputation Power: 19
The only thing about this is that it wouldn't really be "teleportation" though since it is only an illusion.
- 0useful
- 1not useful
#5. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 02, 201013Year Member
Posts: 2,244
Reputation Power: 89
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 02, 201013Year Member
Posts: 2,244
Reputation Power: 89
-Martin- wrote The only thing about this is that it wouldn't really be "teleportation" though since it is only an illusion.
Yea, but that was the point I was trying to make, that what looks like teleportation is really a dimension "switch"
Hence why I wrote "thus giving again the illusion of teleportation."
But I am not very good at explaining things...
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#6. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 22, 201211Year Member
Posts: 471
Reputation Power: 19
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 22, 201211Year Member
Posts: 471
Reputation Power: 19
I like it but there is a flaw quite early. If the coin was in 2 dimensional space, there would not be a coin, just an image. Also, there wouldn't boarders to this tray because the boarders would need height.
And by the way, the fourth dimension is space-time.
Perhaps it would work if you kept it all in the same dimension and simply kept the "person picking up the coin" idea as tunneling through space time. That would be a wormhole.
If that all makes sense?
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
And by the way, the fourth dimension is space-time.
Perhaps it would work if you kept it all in the same dimension and simply kept the "person picking up the coin" idea as tunneling through space time. That would be a wormhole.
If that all makes sense?
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#7. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 02, 201013Year Member
Posts: 2,244
Reputation Power: 89
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 02, 201013Year Member
Posts: 2,244
Reputation Power: 89
morgsboi wrote I like it but there is a flaw quite early. If the coin was in 2 dimensional space, there would not be a coin, just an image. Also, there wouldn't boarders to this tray because the boarders would need height.
And by the way, the fourth dimension is space-time.
Perhaps it would work if you kept it all in the same dimension and simply kept the "person picking up the coin" idea as tunneling through space time. That would be a wormhole.
If that all makes sense?
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Yes, but the coin would be visible, but it wouldn't have height. By picking it up it would make it not visible in two-dimensional space. What I put is a bad explanation, the only reason I put the coin thing is to try and explain the 4D marble in box thing.
I know the forth-dimension is space-time. I am not sure what you mean by "Perhaps it would work if you kept it all in the same dimension and simply kept the "person picking up the coin" idea as tunneling through space time. That would be a wormhole." Because getting the marble out of the box without opening it would be impossible in third-dimension space, but it could be a possibility in forth-Dimension, as what we see as obsolete in 2D, could be seen as obsolete in 3D, seen from 4D, if you get what I mean...
As my main point is the Marble-In-Box idea.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#8. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 22, 201211Year Member
Posts: 471
Reputation Power: 19
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 22, 201211Year Member
Posts: 471
Reputation Power: 19
SovietGnome wrotemorgsboi wrote I like it but there is a flaw quite early. If the coin was in 2 dimensional space, there would not be a coin, just an image. Also, there wouldn't boarders to this tray because the boarders would need height.
And by the way, the fourth dimension is space-time.
Perhaps it would work if you kept it all in the same dimension and simply kept the "person picking up the coin" idea as tunneling through space time. That would be a wormhole.
If that all makes sense?
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Yes, but the coin would be visible, but it wouldn't have height. By picking it up it would make it not visible in two-dimensional space. What I put is a bad explanation, the only reason I put the coin thing is to try and explain the 4D marble in box thing.
I know the forth-dimension is space-time. I am not sure what you mean by "Perhaps it would work if you kept it all in the same dimension and simply kept the "person picking up the coin" idea as tunneling through space time. That would be a wormhole." Because getting the marble out of the box without opening it would be impossible in third-dimension space, but it could be a possibility in forth-Dimension, as what we see as obsolete in 2D, could be seen as obsolete in 3D, seen from 4D, if you get what I mean...
As my main point is the Marble-In-Box idea.
Oh, I get ya. But with 2D, it wouldn't exist to the universe. The reason for that is that there is no possible perspective view of the coin if there isn't any height.
Also, I think you may be interested in quantum mechanics. It can get extremely complicated but it's good once you get your head round it, fully.
Here's a video I've just found. It might seem a bit childish with presentation but this is high grade stuff! It's called "The Double Slit Experiment". It would also be good to look more into that kind of stuff. Ask me, if you like it, for more.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#9. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 02, 201013Year Member
Posts: 2,244
Reputation Power: 89
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 02, 201013Year Member
Posts: 2,244
Reputation Power: 89
morgsboi wroteSovietGnome wrotemorgsboi wrote I like it but there is a flaw quite early. If the coin was in 2 dimensional space, there would not be a coin, just an image. Also, there wouldn't boarders to this tray because the boarders would need height.
And by the way, the fourth dimension is space-time.
Perhaps it would work if you kept it all in the same dimension and simply kept the "person picking up the coin" idea as tunneling through space time. That would be a wormhole.
If that all makes sense?
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Yes, but the coin would be visible, but it wouldn't have height. By picking it up it would make it not visible in two-dimensional space. What I put is a bad explanation, the only reason I put the coin thing is to try and explain the 4D marble in box thing.
I know the forth-dimension is space-time. I am not sure what you mean by "Perhaps it would work if you kept it all in the same dimension and simply kept the "person picking up the coin" idea as tunneling through space time. That would be a wormhole." Because getting the marble out of the box without opening it would be impossible in third-dimension space, but it could be a possibility in forth-Dimension, as what we see as obsolete in 2D, could be seen as obsolete in 3D, seen from 4D, if you get what I mean...
As my main point is the Marble-In-Box idea.
Oh, I get ya. But with 2D, it wouldn't exist to the universe. The reason for that is that there is no possible perspective view of the coin if there isn't any height.
Also, I think you may be interested in quantum mechanics. It can get extremely complicated but it's good once you get your head round it, fully.
Here's a video I've just found. It might seem a bit childish with presentation but this is high grade stuff! It's called "The Double Slit Experiment". It would also be good to look more into that kind of stuff. Ask me, if you like it, for more.
Yea, I know about the Double Split Experiment, very interesting, I even watched that video funnily enough, yes I am interested in quantum mechanics. I would like to know more about it, but where to start? ._.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#10. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 22, 201211Year Member
Posts: 471
Reputation Power: 19
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 22, 201211Year Member
Posts: 471
Reputation Power: 19
SovietGnome wrotemorgsboi wroteSovietGnome wrotemorgsboi wrote I like it but there is a flaw quite early. If the coin was in 2 dimensional space, there would not be a coin, just an image. Also, there wouldn't boarders to this tray because the boarders would need height.
And by the way, the fourth dimension is space-time.
Perhaps it would work if you kept it all in the same dimension and simply kept the "person picking up the coin" idea as tunneling through space time. That would be a wormhole.
If that all makes sense?
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Yes, but the coin would be visible, but it wouldn't have height. By picking it up it would make it not visible in two-dimensional space. What I put is a bad explanation, the only reason I put the coin thing is to try and explain the 4D marble in box thing.
I know the forth-dimension is space-time. I am not sure what you mean by "Perhaps it would work if you kept it all in the same dimension and simply kept the "person picking up the coin" idea as tunneling through space time. That would be a wormhole." Because getting the marble out of the box without opening it would be impossible in third-dimension space, but it could be a possibility in forth-Dimension, as what we see as obsolete in 2D, could be seen as obsolete in 3D, seen from 4D, if you get what I mean...
As my main point is the Marble-In-Box idea.
Oh, I get ya. But with 2D, it wouldn't exist to the universe. The reason for that is that there is no possible perspective view of the coin if there isn't any height.
Also, I think you may be interested in quantum mechanics. It can get extremely complicated but it's good once you get your head round it, fully.
Here's a video I've just found. It might seem a bit childish with presentation but this is high grade stuff! It's called "The Double Slit Experiment". It would also be good to look more into that kind of stuff. Ask me, if you like it, for more.
Yea, I know about the Double Split Experiment, very interesting, I even watched that video funnily enough, yes I am interested in quantum mechanics. I would like to know more about it, but where to start? ._.
Here are some YouTube videos that might help:
Quantum Revoloution
Professor Brian Cox
Professor Stephen Hawking
That took ages to find the right stuff haha! Anyway, that should keep you busy for ages! Click on related videos too, they can sometimes be really good. ;)
- 2useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.