You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
Rant on Illegalizing Fire Arms
Posted:
Rant on Illegalizing Fire ArmsPosted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 11, 201112Year Member
Posts: 1,165
Reputation Power: 50
I've noticed a lot of talk on the shooting in the theater in Aurora, Colorado. And from what I've seen most people are saying "this is why fire arms need to be illegal". Well here's my take.
As a Citizen of the United States of America I have the right to bear arms.
Taking fire arms away from LAW ABIDING citizens does not take them away from those who do not abide by the law. Otherwise known as criminals.
Criminals usually have bad intentions, and when only criminals have guns and you can't defend yourself from an attacker then you DIE.
Also the theater had a sign that said "No Firearms Allowed Inside". Well anyone who obey's the law would listen to that sign. Which those who were in the theater did. Except for the killer. And when you have a sign like that it's an invitation to come in and kill everyone because he knew they'd be unarmed and unable to defend themselves. I think this theater should be sued for having such a stupid sign posted.
If someone in that movie theater was armed besides the man who killed those 12 people then I guarantee you that not nearly as many people would have been killed.
Last edited by Zir ; edited 1 time in total
As a Citizen of the United States of America I have the right to bear arms.
Taking fire arms away from LAW ABIDING citizens does not take them away from those who do not abide by the law. Otherwise known as criminals.
Criminals usually have bad intentions, and when only criminals have guns and you can't defend yourself from an attacker then you DIE.
Also the theater had a sign that said "No Firearms Allowed Inside". Well anyone who obey's the law would listen to that sign. Which those who were in the theater did. Except for the killer. And when you have a sign like that it's an invitation to come in and kill everyone because he knew they'd be unarmed and unable to defend themselves. I think this theater should be sued for having such a stupid sign posted.
If someone in that movie theater was armed besides the man who killed those 12 people then I guarantee you that not nearly as many people would have been killed.
Last edited by Zir ; edited 1 time in total
The following 9 users thanked Zir for this useful post:
Mountain_Dew (08-05-2012), Basiik (08-01-2012), SovietRussia (07-31-2012), St_Louis (07-31-2012), Aced (07-28-2012), Vaya (07-27-2012), Secrets (07-26-2012), 370z (07-26-2012), IiZillax (07-25-2012)
#2. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 21, 201211Year Member
Posts: 428
Reputation Power: 18
But in the UK, where no-one has a gun, no-one gets shot because no-one has a gun...
- 22useful
- 19not useful
#3. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 18, 201211Year Member
Posts: 4
Reputation Power: 0
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 18, 201211Year Member
Posts: 4
Reputation Power: 0
Bipedal_Feline wrote
The weapon used in the shooting, the assault machine gun known as the ar15 (stands for "Apfel Reich" in German which translates to "baby killer" in English), was specifically designed by the Nazis to mow down infants with ease, however even Hitler found it a weapon too evil to arm his troops with, and exiled the design and its creator from Germany, never to return. The design was then bought by the communist and convicted pedophile Eugene Stoner, who added capabilities such as the ability to take assault drum clips capable of holding up to 200 heat seeking 30mm shells or 50 small nuclear warheads capable of levelling 12 kindergartens at once.
Why would you want such an evil weapon to be in the hands of civilians?
- 3useful
- 12not useful
#4. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 11, 201112Year Member
Posts: 1,165
Reputation Power: 50
Bipedal_Feline wroteBipedal_Feline wrote
The weapon used in the shooting, the assault machine gun known as the ar15 (stands for "Apfel Reich" in German which translates to "baby killer" in English), was specifically designed by the Nazis to mow down infants with ease, however even Hitler found it a weapon too evil to arm his troops with, and exiled the design and its creator from Germany, never to return. The design was then bought by the communist and convicted pedophile Eugene Stoner, who added capabilities such as the ability to take assault drum clips capable of holding up to 200 heat seeking 30mm shells or 50 small nuclear warheads capable of levelling 12 kindergartens at once.
Why would you want such an evil weapon to be in the hands of civilians?
Evil weapon? Last time I checked it was the person operating the weapon that has feelings or intentions?
- 15useful
- 2not useful
#5. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 11, 201112Year Member
Posts: 1,165
Reputation Power: 50
Kuben wrote But in the UK, where no-one has a gun, no-one gets shot because no-one has a gun...
You are obviously un-educated about your own country. The United Kingdom has criminals. Criminals tend to break laws. Criminals sometimes have guns. See where this is going?
- 13useful
- 2not useful
#6. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 11, 201112Year Member
Posts: 1,165
Reputation Power: 50
#7. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 18, 201013Year Member
Posts: 1,350
Reputation Power: 56
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 18, 201013Year Member
Posts: 1,350
Reputation Power: 56
Kuben wrote But in the UK, where no-one has a gun, no-one gets shot because no-one has a gun...
People do get shot in the UK, to even think that they don't is just retarded. Because they're illegal doesn't mean people don't have them. Even at that though America still has more gun related crimes and deaths than the UK.
- 3useful
- 4not useful
#8. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 18, 201013Year Member
Posts: 1,350
Reputation Power: 56
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 18, 201013Year Member
Posts: 1,350
Reputation Power: 56
Zir wroteKuben wrote But in the UK, where no-one has a gun, no-one gets shot because no-one has a gun...
No one has a gun huh?
Read this:
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
You obviously lack knowledge of your own country.
What you may want to notice about that is that 12 people were killed, it was "the worst UK shooting spree in 14 years"
Yet people get killed like that in America a lot, this isn't the first time a shooting spree which happened in America has been on the news.
Although he wasn't right about the no guns thing you have to admit that making guns illegal would reduce gun related crimes.
- 4useful
- 5not useful
#9. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 21, 201211Year Member
Posts: 428
Reputation Power: 18
Zir wroteKuben wrote But in the UK, where no-one has a gun, no-one gets shot because no-one has a gun...
No one has a gun huh?
Read this:
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
You obviously lack knowledge of your own country.
Gun crimes are much more common in america, it even says in the article retard.
Multiple shootings are rare in Britain where there are strict gun controls.
- 3useful
- 5not useful
#10. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 11, 201112Year Member
Posts: 1,165
Reputation Power: 50
Kuben wroteZir wroteKuben wrote But in the UK, where no-one has a gun, no-one gets shot because no-one has a gun...
No one has a gun huh?
Read this:
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
You obviously lack knowledge of your own country.
Gun crimes are much more common in america, it even says in the article ****.
Multiple shootings are rare in Britain where there are strict gun controls.
You made a false statement. So I proved you wrong. I never said America had less gun crimes. Oh and we're a Democracy. It explains our freedom.
- 6useful
- 5not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.