You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
Best Formation?
Posted:

Best Formation?Posted:

IeatNoobsFobFast
  • Resident Elite
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 31, 201112Year Member
Posts: 271
Reputation Power: 10
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 31, 201112Year Member
Posts: 271
Reputation Power: 10
ok so me and my friends we usually have 2 strikers and a cam and then occasionally 3 strikers and a cam what is a good formation we like to play through balls and then we also like to cross it alot so what is a good formation to try
#2. Posted:
PhotoshopFx
  • Powerhouse
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 18, 201212Year Member
Posts: 499
Reputation Power: 27
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 18, 201212Year Member
Posts: 499
Reputation Power: 27
5-2-1-2 its really good !
#3. Posted:
StevenN1010
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 03, 201112Year Member
Posts: 1,418
Reputation Power: 55
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 03, 201112Year Member
Posts: 1,418
Reputation Power: 55
IeatNoobsFobFast wrote ok so me and my friends we usually have 2 strikers and a cam and then occasionally 3 strikers and a cam what is a good formation we like to play through balls and then we also like to cross it alot so what is a good formation to try



3-5-2 is decent formation.
#4. Posted:
kuro1
  • New Member
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 28, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1
Reputation Power: 0
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 28, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1
Reputation Power: 0
Ok I like 3-5-2 is decent formation.
#5. Posted:
iBobbiee
  • Christmas!
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 13, 200914Year Member
Posts: 472
Reputation Power: 26
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 13, 200914Year Member
Posts: 472
Reputation Power: 26
If I'm in goal, 3-5-2 is perfect. 5 at the back just gets too crowded, and you loose sight of the ball.

The team I play for, plays 4-1-3-2. This formation doesn't contain a CAM, and it's better that way. You don't need a CAM in pro clubs.
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.