Yeah man pretty decent, not the best, but it will get the job done.

16GB RAM = way to much only get like 8
Battlefield 3 you won't be playing on max or anything but you could play.

-Johnneh- wrote 16GB RAM = way to much only get like 8
Battlefield 3 you won't be playing on max or anything but you could play.

yah like the guy above me said 16gb is way to much ram. I have 8gb and honestly I probably only need half of that. I play a lot of games and as long as you have 4gb then the ram will not affect it pretty much at all

The CPU is a bit slow in all honesty and the graphic's card is OK but not even classed ass GOOD to me. I guess it's fine if you're on a budget of say 700-800

You can play Battlefield 3 on High settings on 45 FPS+

Minecraft 999 FPS lol.

-Frostbite-

Redpeanut wrote The CPU is a bit slow in all honesty and the graphic's card is OK but not even classed **** GOOD to me. I guess it's fine if you're on a budget of say 700-800

He has the latest amd processor with 6 cores bro ;) , THINK before you post , the processor is very good

-Kalasjnikov-

Kalasjnikov wrote

Redpeanut wrote The CPU is a bit slow in all honesty and the graphic's card is OK but not even classed **** GOOD to me. I guess it's fine if you're on a budget of say 700-800

He has the latest amd processor with 6 cores bro ;) , THINK before you post , the processor is very good

-Kalasjnikov-

I ment as in GHz 3.3 is slow, he needs to ovrclock it atlest a bit.

16GB is a bit too much
you only really need 8.
but if your going to be recording and rendering i would get 12 just to give it abit more suppourt.

its a really nice setup aswell i have the exact same but with 12GB RAM and GForce 590

You can play, relitively, any game you want to on high-highest settings.

The only problems I see with that are:

Much more RAM then you need

and

(3.2 GhZ) That's good, but not great for the money you'd be paying.