You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#21. Posted:
Realiity
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 12, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,628
Reputation Power: 46
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 12, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,628
Reputation Power: 46
PrimexSparkie wrote
Realiity wrote
PrimexSparkie wrote Yea dude there both great games but totally different FPS, Mw3 is going to be better in my opinion because its running on the best cod engine ever which is the mw2 engin, i also hate vehicles look at WAW, Tanks were a pain in the ***, second Cod is for people that like lone wolf and stuff like that not that much of team work which is my style 8)

-Great game
-Mw3
Choose one.

-Best Cod engine
It's about 5 years old even Halo Reach got a new engine.

-WAW Vehicles
No **** the vehicles are overpowered with little guns to use against it that's why you even it out which is why BF3 is superior since they can maintain vehicles.

Sure the engine is old but way better than black ops
second i choose mw3 because the maps are always better build and more lone wolf battles as in combat is everywhere, when i play BFBC2 the maps are to big and every one camps like a **** and the vehicles are never even in power, sure you can blow it up but dude if you get in a tank you get 17 kills 1 death which takes no skill, its like noobtubes

-But the engine is better than Black Ops
It's still ****.

-MW3 maps
Isn't every Call of Duty game maps built for campers just look at MW2 and other Cod games but camping happens in every game it's not hard killing them it just takes skill.

-17 kills with a tank in BFBC2
It's either you are exaggerating or have bad teammates like I said it's a team based game but COD has killstreaks which are 100x worse.


Last edited by Realiity ; edited 1 time in total
#22. Posted:
Aliens
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 12, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,210
Reputation Power: 63
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 12, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,210
Reputation Power: 63
TheOnlyBoss wrote Because mw3 is about to be the best game of the century

a game that sells the most copies dosnt make it better then other games.
#23. Posted:
-Spitfire-
  • TTG Warrior
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 15, 201013Year Member
Posts: 9,234
Reputation Power: 279
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 15, 201013Year Member
Posts: 9,234
Reputation Power: 279
BF3 is going to beat mw3 byfar. Each cod game has been terrible since cod4.
#24. Posted:
Sparkies
  • Rising Star
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 13, 201013Year Member
Posts: 732
Reputation Power: 29
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 13, 201013Year Member
Posts: 732
Reputation Power: 29
Realiity wrote
PrimexSparkie wrote
Realiity wrote
PrimexSparkie wrote Yea dude there both great games but totally different FPS, Mw3 is going to be better in my opinion because its running on the best cod engine ever which is the mw2 engin, i also hate vehicles look at WAW, Tanks were a pain in the ***, second Cod is for people that like lone wolf and stuff like that not that much of team work which is my style 8)

-Great game
-Mw3
Choose one.

-Best Cod engine
It's about 5 years old even Halo Reach got a new engine.

-WAW Vehicles
No **** the vehicles are overpowered with little guns to use against it that's why you even it out which is why BF3 is superior since they can maintain vehicles.

Sure the engine is old but way better than black ops
second i choose mw3 because the maps are always better build and more lone wolf battles as in combat is everywhere, when i play BFBC2 the maps are to big and every one camps like a **** and the vehicles are never even in power, sure you can blow it up but dude if you get in a tank you get 17 kills 1 death which takes no skill, its like noobtubes

-But the engine is better than Black Ops
It's still ****.

-MW3 maps
Isn't every Call of Duty game maps built for campers just look at MW2?

-17 kills with a tank in BFBC2
It's either you are exaggerating or have bad teammates like I said it's a team based game.

There you go thats why i hate BF alot most of the time when i play
MY TEAM MATES SUCK and we all get F'd up
in mw2 if your team mates suck, you don't suffer like in BF
second nah man look at BF theres sniper areas everywhere were a person can just sit there for an hour and not get killed its made for campers only!
Third- A team based game means if your team sucks but your a good player means YOUR GOING TO DO BAD!
#25. Posted:
NyanDog
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 02, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,252
Reputation Power: 67
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 02, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,252
Reputation Power: 67
Everyone has opinions, none is "right" It's not a fact that one will be better than another if you ask 10 people 5 people will like BF3, 5 will like MW3. How can you compare if they aren't even out, and BF and CoD aren't ment to compete, the games are a lot different besides they have to do with war.


Last edited by NyanDog ; edited 1 time in total
#26. Posted:
Realiity
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 12, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,628
Reputation Power: 46
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 12, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,628
Reputation Power: 46
PrimexSparkie wrote
Realiity wrote
PrimexSparkie wrote
Realiity wrote
PrimexSparkie wrote Yea dude there both great games but totally different FPS, Mw3 is going to be better in my opinion because its running on the best cod engine ever which is the mw2 engin, i also hate vehicles look at WAW, Tanks were a pain in the ***, second Cod is for people that like lone wolf and stuff like that not that much of team work which is my style 8)

-Great game
-Mw3
Choose one.

-Best Cod engine
It's about 5 years old even Halo Reach got a new engine.

-WAW Vehicles
No **** the vehicles are overpowered with little guns to use against it that's why you even it out which is why BF3 is superior since they can maintain vehicles.

Sure the engine is old but way better than black ops
second i choose mw3 because the maps are always better build and more lone wolf battles as in combat is everywhere, when i play BFBC2 the maps are to big and every one camps like a **** and the vehicles are never even in power, sure you can blow it up but dude if you get in a tank you get 17 kills 1 death which takes no skill, its like noobtubes

-But the engine is better than Black Ops
It's still ****.

-MW3 maps
Isn't every Call of Duty game maps built for campers just look at MW2?

-17 kills with a tank in BFBC2
It's either you are exaggerating or have bad teammates like I said it's a team based game.

There you go thats why i hate BF alot most of the time when i play
MY TEAM MATES SUCK and we all get F'd up
in mw2 if your team mates suck, you don't suffer like in BF
second nah man look at BF theres sniper areas everywhere were a person can just sit there for an hour and not get killed its made for campers only!
Third- A team based game means if your team sucks but your a good player means YOUR GOING TO DO BAD!

-MW2 you don't suffer
No shit the game is easy as **** and takes no skill anyone can just put on noobtubes or use some overpowered gun and win a game easily by camping it takes no skill at all.

-Sniper areas everywhere
You can avoid snipers easily I rarely die to one unless I'm running in it's direction or standing still like a dumb *** besides there are such things as flanking them that's mostly what you do to campers.
#27. Posted:
JuicyJ
  • TTG Contender
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 23, 201013Year Member
Posts: 3,091
Reputation Power: 159
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 23, 201013Year Member
Posts: 3,091
Reputation Power: 159
Serene wrote How can you compare them when neither of them are out yet?
8)


Exactly. He can't. He made this whole post entirely on assumption. And MW3 is running on the same engine because why fix something when it's not broken?
#28. Posted:
Realiity
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 12, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,628
Reputation Power: 46
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 12, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,628
Reputation Power: 46
SoggyMonkey wrote Everyone has opinions, none is "right" It's not a fact that one will be better than another if you ask 10 people 5 people will like BF3, 5 will like MW3. How can you compare if they aren't even out, and BF and CoD aren't ment to compete, the games are a lot different besides they have to do with war.

Being superior and liking a game are two different things.

Battlefield 3 is superior to MW3.
#29. Posted:
Realiity
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 12, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,628
Reputation Power: 46
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 12, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,628
Reputation Power: 46
patch_mp wrote
Serene wrote How can you compare them when neither of them are out yet?
8)


Exactly. He can't. He made this whole post entirely on assumption. And MW3 is running on the same engine because why fix something when it's not broken?

>Fix engine
It's not fixing you tard it's called improving.
#30. Posted:
NyanDog
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 02, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,252
Reputation Power: 67
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 02, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,252
Reputation Power: 67
Realiity wrote
SoggyMonkey wrote Everyone has opinions, none is "right" It's not a fact that one will be better than another if you ask 10 people 5 people will like BF3, 5 will like MW3. How can you compare if they aren't even out, and BF and CoD aren't ment to compete, the games are a lot different besides they have to do with war.

Being superior and liking a game are two different things.

Battlefield 3 is superior to MW3.

That is your opinion. You are entitled to your opinion, you can think what you want.
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.