You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
Bin Laden Sons Say U.S. Violated International Law
Posted:
Bin Laden Sons Say U.S. Violated International LawPosted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 23, 201113Year Member
Posts: 43
Reputation Power: 1
The adult sons of Osama bin Laden have lashed out at President Obama over their fathers death, accusing the United States of violating its basic legal principles by killing an unarmed man, shooting his family members and disposing of his body in the sea.
The statement said the family was asking why the leader of Al Qaeda was not arrested and tried in a court of law so that truth is revealed to the people of the world. Citing the trials of Saddam Hussein and Slobodan Milosevic, the statement questioned the propriety of such assassination where not only international law has been blatantly violated, but the principles of presumption of innocence and the right to a fair trial were ignored.
We maintain that arbitrary killing is not a solution to political problems, the statement said, adding that justice must be seen to be done.
The statement, prepared at the direction of Omar bin Laden, a son who had publicly denounced his fathers terrorism, was provided to The New York Times by Jean Sasson, an American author who helped the younger Bin Laden write a 2009 memoir, Growing Up bin Laden. A shorter, slightly different statement was posted on a jihadist Web site Tuesday.
Omar bin Laden, 30, lived with his father in Afghanistan until 1999, when he left with his mother, Najwa bin Laden, who co-wrote the memoir. In the book and other public statements, the younger bin Laden denounced violence of all kinds, a stance he repeated in the sons statement to The Times. None of Osama bin Ladens sons other than Omar was named in the statement, so it was unclear exactly who else had approved the message.
We want to remind the world that Omar bin Laden, the fourth-born son of our father, always disagreed with our father regarding any violence and always sent messages to our father, that he must change his ways and that no civilians should be attacked under any circumstances, the statement said. Despite the difficulty of publicly disagreeing with our father, he never hesitated to condemn any violent attacks made by anyone, and expressed sorrow for the victims of any and all attacks.
Condemning the shooting of one of the Qaeda leaders wives during the assault on May 2 in Abbottabad, Pakistan, the statement added: As he condemned our father, we now condemn the president of the United States for ordering the execution of unarmed men and women.
The sons statement called on the government of Pakistan to hand over to family members the three wives and several children of the terrorist now believed to be in Pakistani custody and asked for a United Nations investigation of the circumstances of their fathers death.
In addition to the statement, Ms. Sasson shared with The Times notes on what Omar bin Laden, who declined to be interviewed directly, has told her by phone in recent days. The notes describe Mr. bin Ladens struggle, as he came of age, to understand and eventually reject his fathers embrace of religious violence.
Mr. bin Laden told Ms. Sasson the death of his father has affected this family in much the same way as many other families in the past in the loss of a family member.
Remember to comment below
The statement said the family was asking why the leader of Al Qaeda was not arrested and tried in a court of law so that truth is revealed to the people of the world. Citing the trials of Saddam Hussein and Slobodan Milosevic, the statement questioned the propriety of such assassination where not only international law has been blatantly violated, but the principles of presumption of innocence and the right to a fair trial were ignored.
We maintain that arbitrary killing is not a solution to political problems, the statement said, adding that justice must be seen to be done.
The statement, prepared at the direction of Omar bin Laden, a son who had publicly denounced his fathers terrorism, was provided to The New York Times by Jean Sasson, an American author who helped the younger Bin Laden write a 2009 memoir, Growing Up bin Laden. A shorter, slightly different statement was posted on a jihadist Web site Tuesday.
Omar bin Laden, 30, lived with his father in Afghanistan until 1999, when he left with his mother, Najwa bin Laden, who co-wrote the memoir. In the book and other public statements, the younger bin Laden denounced violence of all kinds, a stance he repeated in the sons statement to The Times. None of Osama bin Ladens sons other than Omar was named in the statement, so it was unclear exactly who else had approved the message.
We want to remind the world that Omar bin Laden, the fourth-born son of our father, always disagreed with our father regarding any violence and always sent messages to our father, that he must change his ways and that no civilians should be attacked under any circumstances, the statement said. Despite the difficulty of publicly disagreeing with our father, he never hesitated to condemn any violent attacks made by anyone, and expressed sorrow for the victims of any and all attacks.
Condemning the shooting of one of the Qaeda leaders wives during the assault on May 2 in Abbottabad, Pakistan, the statement added: As he condemned our father, we now condemn the president of the United States for ordering the execution of unarmed men and women.
The sons statement called on the government of Pakistan to hand over to family members the three wives and several children of the terrorist now believed to be in Pakistani custody and asked for a United Nations investigation of the circumstances of their fathers death.
In addition to the statement, Ms. Sasson shared with The Times notes on what Omar bin Laden, who declined to be interviewed directly, has told her by phone in recent days. The notes describe Mr. bin Ladens struggle, as he came of age, to understand and eventually reject his fathers embrace of religious violence.
Mr. bin Laden told Ms. Sasson the death of his father has affected this family in much the same way as many other families in the past in the loss of a family member.
Remember to comment below
The following 1 user thanked ItsMeBK for this useful post:
Zoidberg (05-12-2011)
#2. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 23, 200915Year Member
Posts: 143
Reputation Power: 5
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 23, 200915Year Member
Posts: 143
Reputation Power: 5
this is just like if Afghanistan army killed Obama on grounds of murder for all the innocent lives lost there, the american people would feel like he should have been given a fair trail.
the way americans have treated the world like there own and started wars in most of the middle east makes me not trust them, bin laden is alive most likly in a prison being tortured
the way americans have treated the world like there own and started wars in most of the middle east makes me not trust them, bin laden is alive most likly in a prison being tortured
- 1useful
- 1not useful
#3. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 21, 201113Year Member
Posts: 383
Reputation Power: 17
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 21, 201113Year Member
Posts: 383
Reputation Power: 17
They killed an unarmed man? F*** THAT! HE KILLED 100s OF UNARMED MEN ON 9/11.
- 3useful
- 0not useful
#4. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 21, 201113Year Member
Posts: 383
Reputation Power: 17
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 21, 201113Year Member
Posts: 383
Reputation Power: 17
And to the guy above me. Agreed. Why would they just kill him when they have the leader of who U.S is at war with.
- 2useful
- 0not useful
#5. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 18, 201014Year Member
Posts: 5,628
Reputation Power: 254
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 18, 201014Year Member
Posts: 5,628
Reputation Power: 254
Remain wrote They killed an unarmed man? F*** THAT! HE KILLED 100s OF UNARMED MEN ON 9/11.
He killed more than just 100s, He killed 1000s of citizens.
- 2useful
- 0not useful
#6. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 28, 201113Year Member
Posts: 975
Reputation Power: 38
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 28, 201113Year Member
Posts: 975
Reputation Power: 38
I would of killed his family too
What did the people of 9/11 familys feel
They couldnt do nuthing
Watched their family memembers die
2900 people dead from this sick bastard
Forget his family
What did the people of 9/11 familys feel
They couldnt do nuthing
Watched their family memembers die
2900 people dead from this sick bastard
Forget his family
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#7. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 01, 201113Year Member
Posts: 951
Reputation Power: 32
Status: Offline
Joined: May 01, 201113Year Member
Posts: 951
Reputation Power: 32
i agree with them on that part but he was a horrible man. he killed over 2000 people. if he went to court he would have sat in gbay for like a year and then been put on death row for liek 10 years
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#8. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 28, 201013Year Member
Posts: 10,370
Reputation Power: 62821
Motto: Discord: trustedseller
Motto: Discord: trustedseller
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 28, 201013Year Member
Posts: 10,370
Reputation Power: 62821
Motto: Discord: trustedseller
They are just doing this to make themselves not look as much like the bad guys. Osama is dead (I think :p ) and I am glad.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#9. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 13, 201113Year Member
Posts: 415
Reputation Power: 15
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 13, 201113Year Member
Posts: 415
Reputation Power: 15
DUDE IN 9/11 HE KILLED LIKE 1000 PEOPLE F***ING
B***
B***
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#10. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 15, 200815Year Member
Posts: 4,477
Reputation Power: 1480
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 15, 200815Year Member
Posts: 4,477
Reputation Power: 1480
If thier was a fire fight someone on the other side was armed. The wife was used as a shield which is why she was killed.
The body in the sea was out of respect. The pakis burry bodys with in 24 hours. that was the only way the us would of been able to do it.
Nuff Nuff.
The body in the sea was out of respect. The pakis burry bodys with in 24 hours. that was the only way the us would of been able to do it.
Nuff Nuff.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.