You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
Should airports remove body scanners
Posted:

Should airports remove body scannersPosted:

SethRaamKiller
  • Challenger
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 13, 201113Year Member
Posts: 132
Reputation Power: 5
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 13, 201113Year Member
Posts: 132
Reputation Power: 5
We recently had a debate about this in school and I wanted to know what TTG had to say. Body scanners release radiation which can be harmful to pregnant mothers and young children. But on the other side body scanners will enhance airport security speed and it is much kore safer. So tell me if you would want to walk through a body scanner or not
#2. Posted:
Messlah
  • TTG Addict
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 15, 201014Year Member
Posts: 2,631
Reputation Power: 152
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 15, 201014Year Member
Posts: 2,631
Reputation Power: 152
No.. Just scan Guys with Big Turbans on their heads.
#3. Posted:
-Spitfire-
  • TTG Warrior
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 15, 201013Year Member
Posts: 9,234
Reputation Power: 279
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 15, 201013Year Member
Posts: 9,234
Reputation Power: 279
well, why not, pat down those who are children and the mothers who are prego? and the rest just go thru them.? 8)
#4. Posted:
Generation
  • TTG Champion
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 06, 201013Year Member
Posts: 8,002
Reputation Power: 426
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 06, 201013Year Member
Posts: 8,002
Reputation Power: 426
I say keep them there, it will improve the security of the airport.

Maybe they can do something on the radiation part though.
#5. Posted:
-Spitfire-
  • TTG Warrior
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 15, 201013Year Member
Posts: 9,234
Reputation Power: 279
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 15, 201013Year Member
Posts: 9,234
Reputation Power: 279
Messiah wrote No.. Just scan Guys with Big Turbans on their heads.


I was ROFL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i agree with that tho 100%
#6. Posted:
Zuem
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 21, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,121
Reputation Power: 11
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 21, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,121
Reputation Power: 11
maybe just have other ways of getting checked that isnt harmful but if you want it to be quick then you could just do the body scanners.
#7. Posted:
-DEEG-
  • Christmas!
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 26, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,515
Reputation Power: 62
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 26, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,515
Reputation Power: 62
No WTF kind of dumb idea is that do you know how many people would die because of some jackass with a bomb????????????? are you thinking
#8. Posted:
SethRaamKiller
  • Challenger
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 13, 201113Year Member
Posts: 132
Reputation Power: 5
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 13, 201113Year Member
Posts: 132
Reputation Power: 5
Also in a body scanner the person seeing the picture can see you basically naked. So the security man would have to be very mature
#9. Posted:
zion2013
  • Ladder Climber
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 12, 201014Year Member
Posts: 328
Reputation Power: 12
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 12, 201014Year Member
Posts: 328
Reputation Power: 12
keep them would you rather die in a terrorist bombed flight just because you didn't like the idea of the scan
#10. Posted:
Moderator_HaXx
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 23, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,817
Reputation Power: 75
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 23, 201014Year Member
Posts: 1,817
Reputation Power: 75
i would say keep the scanners for retareded that think they can rob a airport or kill anyone
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.