You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
Laptop Question?
Posted:

Laptop Question?Posted:

ShoxGrr
  • Resident Elite
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 26, 201112Year Member
Posts: 255
Reputation Power: 11
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 26, 201112Year Member
Posts: 255
Reputation Power: 11
Hey Guys!

i have a laptop its hp and i trying to know if the Graphic card would even run GTA V


hp 17-X173DX

Hard Drive Capacity1000 gigabytes
.2.7 gigahertz
Processor Intel 7th Generation Core i7
System Memory (RAM) 8 gigabytes
Graphics CardIntel HD Graphics 620
#2. Posted:
16
  • Winter 2018
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 24, 201310Year Member
Posts: 3,654
Reputation Power: 11981
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 24, 201310Year Member
Posts: 3,654
Reputation Power: 11981
no. you'd get less then 10 fps average.
#3. Posted:
Adam
  • Runescape
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 10, 201112Year Member
Posts: 6,059
Reputation Power: 30859
Motto: :Salt:
Motto: :Salt:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 10, 201112Year Member
Posts: 6,059
Reputation Power: 30859
Motto: :Salt:
Mitochondria wrote no. you'd get less then 10 fps average.


?? Intel has made massive improvements on its IGPU over the past generations. That CPU will be able to do some light gaming no problem.

OP - This is what you should expect.

#4. Posted:
16
  • Halloween!
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 24, 201310Year Member
Posts: 3,654
Reputation Power: 11981
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 24, 201310Year Member
Posts: 3,654
Reputation Power: 11981
Adam wrote
Mitochondria wrote no. you'd get less then 10 fps average.


?? Intel has made massive improvements on its IGPU over the past generations. That CPU will be able to do some light gaming no problem.

OP - This is what you should expect.



notebook processors are lower clocked dualcore, unlike a traditional laptop. Keep in mind notebooks let out less power and running a benchmark does show realtime online and offline results it shows a simple gameplay that can be repeated multiple times.
#5. Posted:
Adam
  • Runescape
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 10, 201112Year Member
Posts: 6,059
Reputation Power: 30859
Motto: :Salt:
Motto: :Salt:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 10, 201112Year Member
Posts: 6,059
Reputation Power: 30859
Motto: :Salt:
So running a game benchmark is worse the a synthetic benchmark because it doesn't show real world performance?

Also, [ Register or Signin to view external links. ] suggests that it is a dual core, 4 thread CPU. So not only can it manage multicore workloads, it will be able to turbo to 3.5Ghz which is a decent speed for that architecture.
#6. Posted:
16
  • Spooky Poster
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 24, 201310Year Member
Posts: 3,654
Reputation Power: 11981
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 24, 201310Year Member
Posts: 3,654
Reputation Power: 11981
Adam wrote So running a game benchmark is worse the a synthetic benchmark because it doesn't show real world performance?

Also, [ Register or Signin to view external links. ] suggests that it is a dual core, 4 thread CPU. So not only can it manage multicore workloads, it will be able to turbo to 3.5Ghz which is a decent speed for that architecture.


Mulithread* 3.5/3.2 is average for laptop boost speeds nothing special there. A synthetic benchmark shows a better performance rate in most cases other then gaming, consider you're asking a CPU to render the shaders, as well as the main engine. Intels integrated has come a long way, but not that far. The video you posted was with the inspiron 15, which in both cases the gaming variation and the normal one have a good performance. Also his laptop was running off an SSD and not a 5400 rpm disk. So load times are in play. Also his res will be a bit bigger then the inspirons, so there is another decrease instantly at times.
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.