You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#41. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 28, 201013Year Member
Posts: 2,244
Reputation Power: 257
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 28, 201013Year Member
Posts: 2,244
Reputation Power: 257
I am not going to respond to any individual comment but instead respond to the users against firearms.
Whether you dislike them or not, American citizens have the right to carry firearms and protect themselves.
Law abiding citizens are not the problem, it's criminals who are the issue. This is a statistic done by MSNBC
Meaning about 90-95% of murders and crimes committed with firearms were by illegal firearms and criminals.
So instead of punishing law abiding citizens. How about we take illegal firearms off the street and criminals.
Americans have the right to defend themselves and their property. Here is a video regarding this. It is graphic but people need to stop being babied and learn reality. If the staff disapprove of the video. Just remove it please, thank you.
As for magazine bans and other strict firearm laws. They are pointless, they are there to try and subside the firearm community by annoying them.
Now obviously having 30 or 70 rounds in a magazine or drum is more effective but in the end only punishes law abiding citizens. Now the average American who practices with firearms or who is a regular shooter does not need 30 rounds.
Now, me. I am from NJ which is run by left wing nutjobs who think banning magazines or the ability to adjust your stock makes you less deadly which is the most stupid thing since the movie Jack and Jill.
I am a combat veteran, I don't need 30 rounds in a magazine or a adjustable stock. I will kill you just the same if the gun didn't even have a stock and was a "machine pistol" and that's what people don't get. I don't need 30 rounds, i need just one, maybe two.
Think of it this way, If i am about to go shoot up a pre-school and kill 50 kids. Do you think i am going to obey the god damn law and have a 15 round magazine and worry about my stock being pinned or my barrel being pinned? I'm about to commit murder on a mass scale and yeah, let me worry about getting charged for having an illegal magazine.
Do you understand where i am going with this? If someone is going to commit a crime, it will be with illegal firearms. So all these restrictions punish law abiding citizens.
As a police officer, whenever i come in contact with a legal conceal carry citizen, i honestly don't fear nor get in defense mode. Now while i always am aware and ready in case something happens, i'm worried about the criminal who has a sheet as long as hillary's email list.
Heres another fact
So if there are millions and millions of firearms in the U.S. currently, shouldn't there be millions and millions of murders and crime? No because stated above, 3-11 percent were committed by legal firearms which after i did more research i found out that 5% of that possible 11% were because the guns were stolen from the legal owner.
Whether you dislike them or not, American citizens have the right to carry firearms and protect themselves.
Law abiding citizens are not the problem, it's criminals who are the issue. This is a statistic done by MSNBC
Scarborough said that about "3 percent of murders and crimes are committed with guns from people who actually (legally) purchase those guns." Recent studies that look at prisoners who had a gun when they committed a crime found that between 3 and 11 percent purchased the weapon at a store or gun show
Meaning about 90-95% of murders and crimes committed with firearms were by illegal firearms and criminals.
So instead of punishing law abiding citizens. How about we take illegal firearms off the street and criminals.
Americans have the right to defend themselves and their property. Here is a video regarding this. It is graphic but people need to stop being babied and learn reality. If the staff disapprove of the video. Just remove it please, thank you.
As for magazine bans and other strict firearm laws. They are pointless, they are there to try and subside the firearm community by annoying them.
Now obviously having 30 or 70 rounds in a magazine or drum is more effective but in the end only punishes law abiding citizens. Now the average American who practices with firearms or who is a regular shooter does not need 30 rounds.
Now, me. I am from NJ which is run by left wing nutjobs who think banning magazines or the ability to adjust your stock makes you less deadly which is the most stupid thing since the movie Jack and Jill.
I am a combat veteran, I don't need 30 rounds in a magazine or a adjustable stock. I will kill you just the same if the gun didn't even have a stock and was a "machine pistol" and that's what people don't get. I don't need 30 rounds, i need just one, maybe two.
Think of it this way, If i am about to go shoot up a pre-school and kill 50 kids. Do you think i am going to obey the god damn law and have a 15 round magazine and worry about my stock being pinned or my barrel being pinned? I'm about to commit murder on a mass scale and yeah, let me worry about getting charged for having an illegal magazine.
Do you understand where i am going with this? If someone is going to commit a crime, it will be with illegal firearms. So all these restrictions punish law abiding citizens.
As a police officer, whenever i come in contact with a legal conceal carry citizen, i honestly don't fear nor get in defense mode. Now while i always am aware and ready in case something happens, i'm worried about the criminal who has a sheet as long as hillary's email list.
Heres another fact
The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and
Firearms (ATF) estimates that from
1899 to 1993 about 223 million guns
became available in the United States,
including over 79 million rifles, 77 mil-
lion handguns, and 66 million shot-
guns.
So if there are millions and millions of firearms in the U.S. currently, shouldn't there be millions and millions of murders and crime? No because stated above, 3-11 percent were committed by legal firearms which after i did more research i found out that 5% of that possible 11% were because the guns were stolen from the legal owner.
- 4useful
- 0not useful
#42. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 15, 20149Year Member
Posts: 13,009
Reputation Power: 15478
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 15, 20149Year Member
Posts: 13,009
Reputation Power: 15478
I've never had any problems with weapons mainly because I'm from U.K. I personally think that for protection and no misuse, people deserve to own one. However, if you're going to shit around with one you shouldn't. The obvious really. As for hunting, I don't agree but that's just me.
Edit: from reading some of the comments I can see there are over protective people & very defensive ones. So please don't respond to this comment. It's only my opinion.
Edit: from reading some of the comments I can see there are over protective people & very defensive ones. So please don't respond to this comment. It's only my opinion.
- 2useful
- 1not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.