You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
Mom just bought a c400
Posted:
Mom just bought a c400Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 12, 201310Year Member
Posts: 231
Reputation Power: 8
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 12, 201310Year Member
Posts: 231
Reputation Power: 8
I think its a pretty nice car v6 3.0L twin turbo thing is going to fly. it has 5 modes to switch into eco comfort sport sport+ and individual (you set it). it also has 330 hp and 354 pound feet of torque. If you know about the car or have any facts about it let me know its a whole new model as you may know this is the first ever c400 (also cranberry red interior) let me know your thought on this car
#2. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 01, 20159Year Member
Posts: 194
Reputation Power: 9
I'm not really a fan of Mercedes. There's a certain stigma behind them.
If you're spending $50,000 on a car, there's plenty of other options, many are way more fun too.
It's more expensive, but a Dodge Charger - Hellcat has a 6.2L Supercharged V8, 707 HP, and 650 ft-lb torque. But hey, people spend they're money how they want. That's the beauty of it I guess.
If you're spending $50,000 on a car, there's plenty of other options, many are way more fun too.
It's more expensive, but a Dodge Charger - Hellcat has a 6.2L Supercharged V8, 707 HP, and 650 ft-lb torque. But hey, people spend they're money how they want. That's the beauty of it I guess.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#3. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 12, 201310Year Member
Posts: 231
Reputation Power: 8
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 12, 201310Year Member
Posts: 231
Reputation Power: 8
Betta wrote I'm not really a fan of Mercedes. There's a certain stigma behind them.
If you're spending $50,000 on a car, there's plenty of other options, many are way more fun too.
It's more expensive, but a Dodge Charger - Hellcat has a 6.2L Supercharged V8, 707 HP, and 650 ft-lb torque. But hey, people spend they're money how they want. That's the beauty of it I guess.
Ya but me and my mom dont really like muscle cars we are more luxury yet sporty but if i wanted to go fast i wouldve told her to buy that
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#4. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 01, 20159Year Member
Posts: 194
Reputation Power: 9
ParisSaintGermain wrote
Ya but me and my mom dont really like muscle cars we are more luxury yet sporty but if i wanted to go fast i wouldve told her to buy that
That's why I suggested the Charger instead of the Challenger. The Charger is more luxury, plenty of car reviewers said it's comparable to the BMW M5 of America.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#5. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 27, 20159Year Member
Posts: 2,400
Reputation Power: 5020
Not a fan of Mercedes either wouldve gone with a Hellcat.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#6. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 15, 201113Year Member
Posts: 20,220
Reputation Power: 1362
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 15, 201113Year Member
Posts: 20,220
Reputation Power: 1362
I personally quite like it!
Although in the UK it's quite the drug dealers car.
Although in the UK it's quite the drug dealers car.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#7. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 12, 201310Year Member
Posts: 231
Reputation Power: 8
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 12, 201310Year Member
Posts: 231
Reputation Power: 8
Mickers wrote I personally quite like it!
Although in the UK it's quite the drug dealers car.
HAHA naw m8 thats the c300 were higher class than that
- 2useful
- 0not useful
#8. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 25, 20149Year Member
Posts: 4,817
Reputation Power: 7302
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 25, 20149Year Member
Posts: 4,817
Reputation Power: 7302
Passenger capacity = 5
Trunk capacity = 12.6 cu ft
Transmission type = 7-speed automatic
Engine = 3.0L biturbo V-6
Power = 329 hp @ 5,250-6,000 rpm
Acceleration, 0-60 mph = 5.2 sec
City fuel economy = 21 mpg
Highway fuel economy = 29 mpg
------------------
Headroom = 37.1 in
Legroom = 41.7 in
------------------
Headroom = 37.1 in
Legroom = 35.2 in
------------------
Trunk capacity = 12.6 cu ft
------------------
Overall length = 184.5 in
Overall height = 56.8 in
Overall width = 71.3 in (without mirrors), 79.5 in (with mirrors)
Wheelbase = 111.8 in
Curb weight = 3,693 lbs (4MATIC)
Trunk capacity = 12.6 cu ft
Transmission type = 7-speed automatic
Engine = 3.0L biturbo V-6
Power = 329 hp @ 5,250-6,000 rpm
Acceleration, 0-60 mph = 5.2 sec
City fuel economy = 21 mpg
Highway fuel economy = 29 mpg
------------------
Headroom = 37.1 in
Legroom = 41.7 in
------------------
Headroom = 37.1 in
Legroom = 35.2 in
------------------
Trunk capacity = 12.6 cu ft
------------------
Overall length = 184.5 in
Overall height = 56.8 in
Overall width = 71.3 in (without mirrors), 79.5 in (with mirrors)
Wheelbase = 111.8 in
Curb weight = 3,693 lbs (4MATIC)
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#9. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 12, 201310Year Member
Posts: 231
Reputation Power: 8
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 12, 201310Year Member
Posts: 231
Reputation Power: 8
big-red-riding-hood wrote Passenger capacity = 5
Trunk capacity = 12.6 cu ft
Transmission type = 7-speed automatic
Engine = 3.0L biturbo V-6
Power = 329 hp @ 5,250-6,000 rpm
Acceleration, 0-60 mph = 5.2 sec
City fuel economy = 21 mpg
Highway fuel economy = 29 mpg
------------------
Headroom = 37.1 in
Legroom = 41.7 in
------------------
Headroom = 37.1 in
Legroom = 35.2 in
------------------
Trunk capacity = 12.6 cu ft
------------------
Overall length = 184.5 in
Overall height = 56.8 in
Overall width = 71.3 in (without mirrors), 79.5 in (with mirrors)
Wheelbase = 111.8 in
Curb weight = 3,693 lbs (4MATIC)
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL thanks man haaha you even included with and without mirrors
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#10. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 25, 20149Year Member
Posts: 4,817
Reputation Power: 7302
Straight from the automakers website lol.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.