You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
What if we're the cells of larger life?
Posted:
What if we're the cells of larger life?Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 18, 201212Year Member
Posts: 84
Reputation Power: 3
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 18, 201212Year Member
Posts: 84
Reputation Power: 3
So i was thinking a while back and just go to wondering have you ever thought to yourself what if we are a cell for other life.
think about it our cells are so small if they were capable of "seeing" if they tried looking out they would see pretty much what we see in space haha and they keep our bodies running acting as factories so what if we are just a cell.
think about it our cells are so small if they were capable of "seeing" if they tried looking out they would see pretty much what we see in space haha and they keep our bodies running acting as factories so what if we are just a cell.
#2. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 14, 20149Year Member
Posts: 1,720
Reputation Power: 71
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 14, 20149Year Member
Posts: 1,720
Reputation Power: 71
It doesn't really work like that. Cells don't see what we see. Cells don't have site. Cells are made to do a specific thing. Cells live to do there task and multiply. Simple biology will tell you that this wouldn't do a possible thing.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#3. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 21, 201112Year Member
Posts: 1,778
Reputation Power: 91
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 21, 201112Year Member
Posts: 1,778
Reputation Power: 91
Nice try, but no... Cells don't work like this. Cells have no sight. Even if they could see, I doubt they have houses, skyscrapers, etc. If we were cells, we would already know by now.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#4. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 13, 201310Year Member
Posts: 87
Reputation Power: 3
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 13, 201310Year Member
Posts: 87
Reputation Power: 3
those two guys above me don't understand but i do. his analogy was like an analogy of "Horton hears a who." Where in "whoville" was inside of a speck of dust. outside of that dust is "Horton's World" ... It's like what if a speck of dust has an entire galaxy in it... a whole world unseen... But in reality what if we're that specck and there is bigger life than us? idk. i got the concept/analogy... obviously they didn't ^^
- 2useful
- 0not useful
#5. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 21, 201112Year Member
Posts: 1,778
Reputation Power: 91
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 21, 201112Year Member
Posts: 1,778
Reputation Power: 91
LifeofaThoroughbred wrote those two guys above me don't understand but i do. his analogy was like an analogy of "Horton hears a who." Where in "whoville" was inside of a speck of dust. outside of that dust is "Horton's World" ... It's like what if a speck of dust has an entire galaxy in it... a whole world unseen... But in reality what if we're that specck and there is bigger life than us? idk. i got the concept/analogy... obviously they didn't ^^
This is not at all what the OP was suggesting. The OP was saying that we are like cells in part of a much larger organism. So you are the one who did not understand it.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#6. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 19, 201211Year Member
Posts: 5,359
Reputation Power: 405
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 19, 201211Year Member
Posts: 5,359
Reputation Power: 405
Methylamine wroteLifeofaThoroughbred wrote those two guys above me don't understand but i do. his analogy was like an analogy of "Horton hears a who." Where in "whoville" was inside of a speck of dust. outside of that dust is "Horton's World" ... It's like what if a speck of dust has an entire galaxy in it... a whole world unseen... But in reality what if we're that specck and there is bigger life than us? idk. i got the concept/analogy... obviously they didn't ^^
This is not at all what the OP was suggesting. The OP was saying that we are like cells in part of a much larger organism. So you are the one who did not understand it.
Actually he suggests the same just in a much more creative fashion
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#7. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 13, 201013Year Member
Posts: 1,258
Reputation Power: 9074
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 13, 201013Year Member
Posts: 1,258
Reputation Power: 9074
#8. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 21, 201112Year Member
Posts: 1,778
Reputation Power: 91
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 21, 201112Year Member
Posts: 1,778
Reputation Power: 91
RIAA wrote Just thought I'd leave this here
Actually that's not a true picture of the Universe. It's physically impossible as of right now to get a picture of the Universe, much less our Solar System. Every picture you see of the Milky Way is not real. It's simply the artists' view of how it looks based on scientific evidence of its composition and such. For us to get a real aerial view, we would have to send a satellite or something outside of the Milky Way to photograph it. But by then, we wouldn't even be on this earth. It would be our future generation, unless something catastrophic happens between now and then.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.