You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#11. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 08, 20149Year Member
Posts: 2,002
Reputation Power: 5326
Motto: Life's what you make it, so let's make it rock
Motto: Life's what you make it, so let's make it rock
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 08, 20149Year Member
Posts: 2,002
Reputation Power: 5326
Motto: Life's what you make it, so let's make it rock
What the hell did I just read.... Very mathematical.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#12. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 13, 201410Year Member
Posts: 718
Reputation Power: 33
What the fck? I'm actually brain **** with this post!
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#13. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 02, 201310Year Member
Posts: 426
Reputation Power: 21
So your saying that with a number this large matter could be created?
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#14. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 21, 201113Year Member
Posts: 643
Reputation Power: 38
Status: Offline
Joined: May 21, 201113Year Member
Posts: 643
Reputation Power: 38
i followed this for the most part and then saw the g to 64 and was like waaaaa
interesting post man! liked it
interesting post man! liked it
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#15. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 18, 20149Year Member
Posts: 20
Reputation Power: 0
Golem- wroteSo your saying that with a number this large matter could be created?
What I'm saying is your brain weighs more (nearly untraceable) if you have more information in it. If you are talking hard drives, they also weigh more if they have more memory on them. (also untraceable). Also, what I said about being able to remember/know/store the number is rather hypothetical considering you couldn't the store the number anywhere (in our observable universe) in the first place, considering you would be gaining knowledge faster than the universe could expand.
- 1useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.