You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
Man Defense question
Posted:
Man Defense questionPosted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 22, 201211Year Member
Posts: 268
Reputation Power: 10
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 22, 201211Year Member
Posts: 268
Reputation Power: 10
Here is how I want to play Defense on Madden 25. I would like to be able to blitz alot but also have the CBs to not give up big plays. Someone tell me what chem I need for this and what players. My secondary as it sits...
CB1 Richard Sherman 91ovr +9 Zone
CB2 Patrick Peterson 87ovr +8 Pass Rush
CB3 Tim Jennings 85ovr +8 Run Stuff
FS Reggie Nelson 83ovr +5 Pass Rush
SS Adrian Wilson 81ovr +5 Run Stuff
Willing to trade for man D secondary exept for Peterson. He is just too good of a returner to let go XD
CB1 Richard Sherman 91ovr +9 Zone
CB2 Patrick Peterson 87ovr +8 Pass Rush
CB3 Tim Jennings 85ovr +8 Run Stuff
FS Reggie Nelson 83ovr +5 Pass Rush
SS Adrian Wilson 81ovr +5 Run Stuff
Willing to trade for man D secondary exept for Peterson. He is just too good of a returner to let go XD
#2. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 28, 201013Year Member
Posts: 8,179
Reputation Power: 384
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 28, 201013Year Member
Posts: 8,179
Reputation Power: 384
Well if you want to not give up big plays, I would probably go more conservative and get pass defense chemistry. If you want to just get sacks and tackles for losses, rush defense chemistry would be much more aggressive.
But Sherman and Peterson are pretty good corners for not giving up big plays, maybe getting Revis would help. Your safeties are more run support so I'd go for more coverage safeties to also prevent big plays.
But Sherman and Peterson are pretty good corners for not giving up big plays, maybe getting Revis would help. Your safeties are more run support so I'd go for more coverage safeties to also prevent big plays.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#3. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 22, 201211Year Member
Posts: 268
Reputation Power: 10
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 22, 201211Year Member
Posts: 268
Reputation Power: 10
Tom_Brady wrote Well if you want to not give up big plays, I would probably go more conservative and get pass defense chemistry. If you want to just get sacks and tackles for losses, rush defense chemistry would be much more aggressive.
But Sherman and Peterson are pretty good corners for not giving up big plays, maybe getting Revis would help. Your safeties are more run support so I'd go for more coverage safeties to also prevent big plays.
ok thanx ill look for some coverage safeties
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.