You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#21. Posted:
yudodis
  • New Member
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 05, 201310Year Member
Posts: 44
Reputation Power: 2
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 05, 201310Year Member
Posts: 44
Reputation Power: 2
But it had to be an inside job. Did you see how fast the top of the building fell through the rest of the tower? It fell at the same speed that it would fall through thin air. It's just not plausible that they fell that fast, metal weakened through heat or not.
#22. Posted:
Michael1321
  • Powerhouse
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 19, 201310Year Member
Posts: 486
Reputation Power: 13
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 19, 201310Year Member
Posts: 486
Reputation Power: 13
Most conspiracies were aimed at how the building actually fell and it baffled architects, engineers etc how they fell.
#23. Posted:
UnknownModder
  • TTG Commander
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 17, 201014Year Member
Posts: 6,332
Reputation Power: 289
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 17, 201014Year Member
Posts: 6,332
Reputation Power: 289
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

Here is a picture of the plane that crashed into the building, now look at this regular picture.

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

In the 9/11 plane you can see something attached to the bottom of the plane, also before the planes hit the buildings you can see a flash near the front of the plane. A flash shouldn't happen when a plane hits something, maybe if an explosion was there? *Wink wink*

Also they said the same model plane crashed into the pentagon but moments after that happened there is no wreckage and no incendiary damage done to the building, if a plane did crash into it the whole for the pentagon would be way bigger due to the wings and the velocity of the plane.

Seen here
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

I could look up more but I believe this would be enough.
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.