You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
All digital communication is recorded/accessible to the FBI
Posted:
All digital communication is recorded/accessible to the FBIPosted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 30, 201212Year Member
Posts: 5,468
Reputation Power: 245
Read source article for more information and videos.
"The real capabilities and behavior of the US surveillance state are almost entirely unknown to the American public because, like most things of significance done by the US government, it operates behind an impenetrable wall of secrecy. But a seemingly spontaneous admission this week by a former FBI counterterrorism agent provides a rather startling acknowledgment of just how vast and invasive these surveillance activities are.
Over the past couple days, cable news tabloid shows such as CNN's Out Front with Erin Burnett have been excitingly focused on the possible involvement in the Boston Marathon attack of Katherine Russell, the 24-year-old American widow of the deceased suspect, Tamerlan Tsarnaev. As part of their relentless stream of leaks uncritically disseminated by our Adversarial Press Corps, anonymous government officials are claiming that they are now focused on telephone calls between Russell and Tsarnaev that took place both before and after the attack to determine if she had prior knowledge of the plot or participated in any way.
On Wednesday night, Burnett interviewed Tim Clemente, a former FBI counterterrorism agent, about whether the FBI would be able to discover the contents of past telephone conversations between the two. He quite clearly insisted that they could:
BURNETT: Tim, is there any way, obviously, there is a voice mail they can try to get the phone companies to give that up at this point. It's not a voice mail. It's just a conversation. There's no way they actually can find out what happened, right, unless she tells them?
CLEMENTE: "No, there is a way. We certainly have ways in national security investigations to find out exactly what was said in that conversation. It's not necessarily something that the FBI is going to want to present in court, but it may help lead the investigation and/or lead to questioning of her. We certainly can find that out.
BURNETT: "So they can actually get that? People are saying, look, that is incredible.
CLEMENTE: "No, welcome to America. All of that stuff is being captured as we speak whether we know it or like it or not."
"All of that stuff" - meaning every telephone conversation Americans have with one another on US soil, with or without a search warrant - "is being captured as we speak"."
Source: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
I don't agree that our communications should be recorded. It's not about "You shouldn't be hiding anything anyway." It's about our personal rights to privacy. This is pretty disturbing to be honest.
"The real capabilities and behavior of the US surveillance state are almost entirely unknown to the American public because, like most things of significance done by the US government, it operates behind an impenetrable wall of secrecy. But a seemingly spontaneous admission this week by a former FBI counterterrorism agent provides a rather startling acknowledgment of just how vast and invasive these surveillance activities are.
Over the past couple days, cable news tabloid shows such as CNN's Out Front with Erin Burnett have been excitingly focused on the possible involvement in the Boston Marathon attack of Katherine Russell, the 24-year-old American widow of the deceased suspect, Tamerlan Tsarnaev. As part of their relentless stream of leaks uncritically disseminated by our Adversarial Press Corps, anonymous government officials are claiming that they are now focused on telephone calls between Russell and Tsarnaev that took place both before and after the attack to determine if she had prior knowledge of the plot or participated in any way.
On Wednesday night, Burnett interviewed Tim Clemente, a former FBI counterterrorism agent, about whether the FBI would be able to discover the contents of past telephone conversations between the two. He quite clearly insisted that they could:
BURNETT: Tim, is there any way, obviously, there is a voice mail they can try to get the phone companies to give that up at this point. It's not a voice mail. It's just a conversation. There's no way they actually can find out what happened, right, unless she tells them?
CLEMENTE: "No, there is a way. We certainly have ways in national security investigations to find out exactly what was said in that conversation. It's not necessarily something that the FBI is going to want to present in court, but it may help lead the investigation and/or lead to questioning of her. We certainly can find that out.
BURNETT: "So they can actually get that? People are saying, look, that is incredible.
CLEMENTE: "No, welcome to America. All of that stuff is being captured as we speak whether we know it or like it or not."
"All of that stuff" - meaning every telephone conversation Americans have with one another on US soil, with or without a search warrant - "is being captured as we speak"."
Source: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
I don't agree that our communications should be recorded. It's not about "You shouldn't be hiding anything anyway." It's about our personal rights to privacy. This is pretty disturbing to be honest.
The following 1 user thanked Yin for this useful post:
TaigaAisaka (05-05-2013)
#2. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 23, 201311Year Member
Posts: 2,243
Reputation Power: 129
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 23, 201311Year Member
Posts: 2,243
Reputation Power: 129
I don't agree with this either.
They shouldn't be listening to any of our private recordings or anything of the sort.
This isn't right.
They shouldn't be listening to any of our private recordings or anything of the sort.
This isn't right.
- 2useful
- 0not useful
#3. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 03, 201212Year Member
Posts: 5,742
Reputation Power: 2427
Motto: "We cannot be more sensitive to pleasure without being more sensitive to pain." - Alan Watts
Motto: "We cannot be more sensitive to pleasure without being more sensitive to pain." - Alan Watts
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 03, 201212Year Member
Posts: 5,742
Reputation Power: 2427
Motto: "We cannot be more sensitive to pleasure without being more sensitive to pain." - Alan Watts
The internet should not be recorded or listened to specially our private messages.
![Int](https://imgttg.com/user/sig/739298_41654.png)
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#4. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 22, 201211Year Member
Posts: 7,383
Reputation Power: 509
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 22, 201211Year Member
Posts: 7,383
Reputation Power: 509
I already knew that some phone calls were recorded or listened to but voice mails and other messages is something I didn't know about.
- 1useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.