I'm pretty sure if it was a setup, people would know and would have come forward. There were people there from all around the country participating in this event. This was not faked! This video is all based on pictures of the victims and how fake everything looks. Have any of you ever been in a bombing? Probably not. So how the hell would you know what it looks like. It is possible for an explosion the rip your clothing but leave you unharmed. It is all circumstantial evidence and speculation. An eight year old kid died there and two others. Peoples legs were blown off. This was not fake. This happened. It was those two wannabe terrorist Jihadists that did it. Not the government. What the hell would they get out of it? To take over the country. Or maybe it was the Illuminati. I'm sure they had something to do with it. The guy in the video sounds like an idiot. Wake up and stop being so damn stupid :suicide:

KAmiKaZiGRuNT wrote I'm pretty sure if it was a setup, people would know and would have come forward. There were people there from all around the country participating in this event. This was not faked! This video is all based on pictures of the victims and how fake everything looks. Have any of you ever been in a bombing? Probably not. So how the hell would you know what it looks like. It is possible for an explosion the rip your clothing but leave you unharmed. It is all circumstantial evidence and speculation. An eight year old kid died there and two others. Peoples legs were blown off. This was not fake. This happened. It was those two wannabe terrorist Jihadists that did it. Not the government. What the hell would they get out of it? To take over the country. Or maybe it was the Illuminati. I'm sure they had something to do with it. The guy in the video sounds like an idiot. Wake up and stop being so damn stupid :suicide:

Okay so you're saying, the internet is not a reliable source judging by your last reply too, does this mean you believe the news media reporting the FBI said this and that, and the FBI claiming "Oh, well now he claims to have been apart of.." etc etc.. Why do you just jump to conclusion and believe what they say? No one truly even knows for sure, a news channel reports something (which could be entirely wrong, but just for ratings) and then people that are against conspiracies say that's "cold hard evidence" oh give me a break. Also, why call them wannabe terrorists when you said the attack was a "terrorist attack".. I'm sure you're considered a terrorist when you commit a crime like that, besides that though, seems like you just go based off of what the news media said lmao

i don't believe in our gov. either but why would they set something up this tragic huh and this is a youtube video as shadow1 said it's an unreliable source of information

Epilepsies wrote

KAmiKaZiGRuNT wrote I'm pretty sure if it was a setup, people would know and would have come forward. There were people there from all around the country participating in this event. This was not faked! This video is all based on pictures of the victims and how fake everything looks. Have any of you ever been in a bombing? Probably not. So how the hell would you know what it looks like. It is possible for an explosion the rip your clothing but leave you unharmed. It is all circumstantial evidence and speculation. An eight year old kid died there and two others. Peoples legs were blown off. This was not fake. This happened. It was those two wannabe terrorist Jihadists that did it. Not the government. What the hell would they get out of it? To take over the country. Or maybe it was the Illuminati. I'm sure they had something to do with it. The guy in the video sounds like an idiot. Wake up and stop being so damn stupid :suicide:

Okay so you're saying, the internet is not a reliable source judging by your last reply too, does this mean you believe the news media reporting the FBI said this and that, and the FBI claiming "Oh, well now he claims to have been apart of.." etc etc.. Why do you just jump to conclusion and believe what they say? No one truly even knows for sure, a news channel reports something (which could be entirely wrong, but just for ratings) and then people that are against conspiracies say that's "cold hard evidence" oh give me a break. Also, why call them wannabe terrorists when you said the attack was a "terrorist attack".. I'm sure you're considered a terrorist when you commit a crime like that, besides that though, seems like you just go based off of what the news media said lmao

I don't think it was our government because it is kinda stupid to think they did it. The internet isn't a reliable source of information because all of it is speculation and can be falsified to suit your needs. And I called them wannabe terrorist Jihadists. Jihadists are suppose to kill themselves with the bomb and they didn't. Hence the wannabe... It is illegal for news agencies to report something just for ratings. That's called yellow journalism and has been highly illegal for quite some time. So yes I do trust the media because it is their job to find the information. Does that answer all your questions?

KAmiKaZiGRuNT wrote

Epilepsies wrote

KAmiKaZiGRuNT wrote I'm pretty sure if it was a setup, people would know and would have come forward. There were people there from all around the country participating in this event. This was not faked! This video is all based on pictures of the victims and how fake everything looks. Have any of you ever been in a bombing? Probably not. So how the hell would you know what it looks like. It is possible for an explosion the rip your clothing but leave you unharmed. It is all circumstantial evidence and speculation. An eight year old kid died there and two others. Peoples legs were blown off. This was not fake. This happened. It was those two wannabe terrorist Jihadists that did it. Not the government. What the hell would they get out of it? To take over the country. Or maybe it was the Illuminati. I'm sure they had something to do with it. The guy in the video sounds like an idiot. Wake up and stop being so damn stupid :suicide:

Okay so you're saying, the internet is not a reliable source judging by your last reply too, does this mean you believe the news media reporting the FBI said this and that, and the FBI claiming "Oh, well now he claims to have been apart of.." etc etc.. Why do you just jump to conclusion and believe what they say? No one truly even knows for sure, a news channel reports something (which could be entirely wrong, but just for ratings) and then people that are against conspiracies say that's "cold hard evidence" oh give me a break. Also, why call them wannabe terrorists when you said the attack was a "terrorist attack".. I'm sure you're considered a terrorist when you commit a crime like that, besides that though, seems like you just go based off of what the news media said lmao

I don't think it was our government because it is kinda stupid to think they did it. The internet isn't a reliable source of information because all of it is speculation and can be falsified to suit your needs. And I called them wannabe terrorist Jihadists. Jihadists are suppose to kill themselves with the bomb and they didn't. Hence the wannabe... It is illegal for news agencies to report something just for ratings. That's called yellow journalism and has been highly illegal for quite some time. So yes I do trust the media because it is their job to find the information. Does that answer all your questions?

There's a difference between Jihadists and Suicide Bombers/Martyrs.
Jihad is holy war. A jihadist is a soldier fighting the holy war.
This doesn't mean they have to kill themselves.

Also, the media reports things within the first 24 hours of an event without any knowledge of what is accurate and what is not.
The media reported that there were 2 shooters at Sandy Hook because another man was arrested as a precaution.
That wasn't illegal.

This sounds really fishy to me

I feel bad for thew people affected.