B3ASTiixRAMPAG3 wrote

Andy241 wrote No, for gay's.

Yes for lezza's.

/thread

Try using your brain rather than your downstairs, you nut.

Do you take it in the bum or something?

Andy241 wrote No, for gay's.

Yes for lezza's.

/thread

Are you actually this stupid or are you trolling?

PixL wrote No, it shouldn't be aloud. Marriage should be between a Man and a Woman, and nothing more. I do believe in happiness, but not like that.

Sure, and you're entitled to your opinion, but why do you restrict others ability to get a marriage? They have benefits non-married couples don't have. The church can restrict holy matrimony all they damn well please but your opinion can not refuse others their rights if you expect your own (The first amendment).

Andy241 wrote

B3ASTiixRAMPAG3 wrote

Andy241 wrote No, for gay's.

Yes for lezza's.

/thread

Try using your brain rather than your downstairs, you nut.

Do you take it in the bum or something?

How are you not banned yet!

You're proving my point by being immature.
We are the only species that homophobia exists and it's because of ignorant people like you.

For your info. I don't! If someone else wants to do that well then so be it.
There sexual devours has nothing to do with me and it could be considered gay you wanting to know if I do you twisted idiot.

Go on, keep proving my point you're a dumb ass.

Yes, Gay marriage should be fully supported. And as for the bible, you have to look at the context and the meaning behind the words. Leviticus was all about putting things into categories and different categories did not mix. So technically you break God's law if you wear clothes that are a blend of two different fibers. Divorce is also condemned in Leviticus, but we don't forbid people to divorce. %50 of all marriages end in it. Also, you should be condemned if you touch a woman in any way within 7 days of "That time of the month" according to it. What Leviticus actually meant in "Man shall not lie with man as he does with a woman" means a man should not treat a fellow man as his inferior as he would a woman, because treating a man as a woman was wrong.

Back then, every woman belonged to some man, either her father or her husband. Having sex after the wedding to consummate the marriage was the man officially claiming ownership of his wife. And, if you have "Relations" with a man, you are treating him as you would a woman. Leviticus was all about property law. Not why one man shouldn't marry another. Of course, now a days, the Bible is used selectively as a weapon, so unless you want to kill all unmarried, non-virginal women, divorcees, and people who wear mixed fabrics, your argument is invalid. Thanks if you took the time to read this, I hope it shows you a better part of the story. #ProGayRights

Living in a Catholic Ruled Country (Dublin, Ireland) i've had religion forced down my throat as a child, The Fear of God and what not, I say if two people are in love and want to take that bond even further I say let it happen. The Church/Religion has never contributed to anything apart from false prophets and wars.

UMP wrote

SkorpionEVOIII wrote This is a topic that is going to start a huge debate

But my opinion is same sex marriages shouldn't be allowed because I believe in the Bible and Jesus Christ and it strictly goes against same sex marriage

Not everybody believes in Christ or the Bible, there are many religions in the world.

That is true, but Christianity is not the only religion against gay marriage. But hey if you want to marry the same gender go for it, I'm not going to stop you.

Eh, it's a tough topic to talk about. Sure there are pros and cons, but I think it should ultimately be up to the state to decide.

The poll is really dimming my hope for humanity.
Progress means change, break tradition, don't adhere to it.
:coffee:

It's fine with me, just don't come to me with it.