You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#11. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 28, 201211Year Member
Posts: 1,063
Reputation Power: 50
Brad- wrote I would never even consider buiilding a team with that formation
which formation would you suggest for pace abuse?
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#12. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 04, 201013Year Member
Posts: 5,770
Reputation Power: 530
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 04, 201013Year Member
Posts: 5,770
Reputation Power: 530
-Cry wroteBrad- wrote I would never even consider buiilding a team with that formation
which formation would you suggest for pace abuse?
41212. So many OP CDMs (Ramires etc.) aswell as some wingers, a CAM which has plenty of OP players and the most important part; 2 strikers. Play 1-2's with them and abuse the pace
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#13. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 17, 201112Year Member
Posts: 64
Reputation Power: 2
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 17, 201112Year Member
Posts: 64
Reputation Power: 2
Swap Kelvin and Danilinho around. You want the one with more pace and better shooting as your RF (which is Danilinho).
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#14. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 28, 201211Year Member
Posts: 1,063
Reputation Power: 50
Brad- wrote-Cry wroteBrad- wrote I would never even consider buiilding a team with that formation
which formation would you suggest for pace abuse?
41212. So many OP CDMs (Ramires etc.) aswell as some wingers, a CAM which has plenty of OP players and the most important part; 2 strikers. Play 1-2's with them and abuse the pace
thanks bro, need to ask you something in pm
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#15. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 28, 201211Year Member
Posts: 1,063
Reputation Power: 50
connorhowell wrote **** 02020202020202202020 TROLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
i feed on trolls..... Go back under your bridge
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.