You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#11. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 06, 201112Year Member
Posts: 1,893
Reputation Power: 105
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 06, 201112Year Member
Posts: 1,893
Reputation Power: 105
#12. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 05, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,472
Reputation Power: 77
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 05, 201113Year Member
Posts: 1,472
Reputation Power: 77
Man city or combine both
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#13. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 04, 201212Year Member
Posts: 987
Reputation Power: 40
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 04, 201212Year Member
Posts: 987
Reputation Power: 40
#14. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 01, 201113Year Member
Posts: 431
Reputation Power: 16
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 01, 201113Year Member
Posts: 431
Reputation Power: 16
Alkaline wroteRooney, Van persie, Scholes, Vidic, fast? Idiot haha, go for a City team its amazing much better players, and a lot faster!Hez wrote I'd go for a City team, alot quicker and better players, keeper, defence etc.
Derp, United is quite obviously a quicker team than City.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#15. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 28, 201311Year Member
Posts: 198
Reputation Power: 8
kameronXD wroteAlkaline wroteRooney, Van persie, Scholes, Vidic, fast? Idiot haha, go for a City team its amazing much better players, and a lot faster!Hez wrote I'd go for a City team, alot quicker and better players, keeper, defence etc.
Derp, United is quite obviously a quicker team than City.
Quickest man united and man city team possible:
Man city AVG Pace 82: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Man united AVG Pace 84: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Im sorry but stats dont lie.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#16. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 01, 201113Year Member
Posts: 431
Reputation Power: 16
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 01, 201113Year Member
Posts: 431
Reputation Power: 16
Alkaline wroteThere IF players though theres a difference, i doubt he has the money for all of the IF players and they are terrible players for man utd compare to their normal line upkameronXD wroteAlkaline wroteRooney, Van persie, Scholes, Vidic, fast? Idiot haha, go for a City team its amazing much better players, and a lot faster!Hez wrote I'd go for a City team, alot quicker and better players, keeper, defence etc.
Derp, United is quite obviously a quicker team than City.
Quickest man united and man city team possible:
Man city AVG Pace 82: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Man united AVG Pace 84: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Im sorry but stats dont lie.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#17. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 28, 201311Year Member
Posts: 198
Reputation Power: 8
kameronXD wroteAlkaline wroteThere IF players though theres a difference, i doubt he has the money for all of the IF players and they are terrible players for man utd compare to their normal line upkameronXD wroteAlkaline wroteRooney, Van persie, Scholes, Vidic, fast? Idiot haha, go for a City team its amazing much better players, and a lot faster!Hez wrote I'd go for a City team, alot quicker and better players, keeper, defence etc.
Derp, United is quite obviously a quicker team than City.
Quickest man united and man city team possible:
Man city AVG Pace 82: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Man united AVG Pace 84: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Im sorry but stats dont lie.
Same with City... some IF players that he wont afford and some players that wouldnt be in their normal line up.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#18. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 07, 201112Year Member
Posts: 103
Reputation Power: 2
Alkaline wrotekameronXD wroteAlkaline wroteThere IF players though theres a difference, i doubt he has the money for all of the IF players and they are terrible players for man utd compare to their normal line upkameronXD wroteAlkaline wroteRooney, Van persie, Scholes, Vidic, fast? Idiot haha, go for a City team its amazing much better players, and a lot faster!Hez wrote I'd go for a City team, alot quicker and better players, keeper, defence etc.
Derp, United is quite obviously a quicker team than City.
Quickest man united and man city team possible:
Man city AVG Pace 82: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Man united AVG Pace 84: [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Im sorry but stats dont lie.
Same with City... some IF players that he wont afford and some players that wouldnt be in their normal line up.
You wouldn't use that United team, you would use the city team. Use normal players, no IF's, and their teams main line up. So on that note, City are faster.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#19. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 22, 201212Year Member
Posts: 230
Reputation Power: 8
Status: Offline
Joined: May 22, 201212Year Member
Posts: 230
Reputation Power: 8
i would choose a liverpool team
- 1useful
- 1not useful
#20. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 07, 201211Year Member
Posts: 974
Reputation Power: 45
city all the way i love playing with city players
- 0useful
- 1not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.