I saw Far Cry 3 being played the other day and its similar but way different.

AquaBeatz wrote With guns i myself dont play skyrim i know all about it and i was wondering to
people who do play skyrim is this statement true?

it like a mix of cod skyrim battlefield and just cause. ive played the shit out of it so far the single player is awesome. multiplayer is like a mix of cod and battlefield bc2

the only real similarity is that its a completley open map with both sidemissions and challanges.

Dont get me wrong i think FC3 is an insane and fun game, the weapon custimization is cool and its fun to play, the main story is Long but doesnt get boring and the plot is good.

I would say the MP sucks, but thats because most of the weapons that SHOULD do high damage dont and the AR's and SMG's do insane damage, for example

Bow with Fire arrows = 2-3 shot kill
standard assault rifle = 2-3 shot kill

Now in the SP 1 arrow = kill

im not saying that it is unrealistic, i mean an M-16 has the potential to kill you with 1 bullet agreed, but getting shot with an arrow that explodes THEN sets on fire and it STILL takes 2-3 ? kinda sucks.

GV

rented farcry 3 from my work using a 5 day renting book, and in those 5 days, including college and work, i beat the storyline and returned it, not worth it in my opinion

People say Far Cry 3 is like Skyrim with guns.

Never played any Far Cry games. But I got Skyrim yesterday and it's very fun.

More like a modern day version of Assassins creed

GR33NV3N0M wrote the only real similarity is that its a completley open map with both sidemissions and challanges.

Dont get me wrong i think FC3 is an insane and fun game, the weapon custimization is cool and its fun to play, the main story is Long but doesnt get boring and the plot is good.

I would say the MP sucks, but thats because most of the weapons that SHOULD do high damage dont and the AR's and SMG's do insane damage, for example

Bow with Fire arrows = 2-3 shot kill
standard assault rifle = 2-3 shot kill

Now in the SP 1 arrow = kill

im not saying that it is unrealistic, i mean an M-16 has the potential to kill you with 1 bullet agreed, but getting shot with an arrow that explodes THEN sets on fire and it STILL takes 2-3 ? kinda sucks.

GV

actually the .223 that the m-16 lays out is lacking in stopping power in my opinion and flameing arrows are so stupid its not even funny, and the explodeing arrows in real life are basically useless, a firecracker on a stick

Luscidality wrote

GR33NV3N0M wrote the only real similarity is that its a completley open map with both sidemissions and challanges.

Dont get me wrong i think FC3 is an insane and fun game, the weapon custimization is cool and its fun to play, the main story is Long but doesnt get boring and the plot is good.

I would say the MP sucks, but thats because most of the weapons that SHOULD do high damage dont and the AR's and SMG's do insane damage, for example

Bow with Fire arrows = 2-3 shot kill
standard assault rifle = 2-3 shot kill

Now in the SP 1 arrow = kill

im not saying that it is unrealistic, i mean an M-16 has the potential to kill you with 1 bullet agreed, but getting shot with an arrow that explodes THEN sets on fire and it STILL takes 2-3 ? kinda sucks.

GV

actually the .223 that the m-16 lays out is lacking in stopping power in my opinion and flameing arrows are so stupid its not even funny, and the explodeing arrows in real life are basically useless, a firecracker on a stick

yeah i wasnt comparing the firepower to real life only to the singleplayer campaign.

GV

far cry 3 is harder then skyrim and you run out of ammo alot and i fall off of cliffs and die alot but its a good game