Fyi you dont need 8gigs vram max at most 6gigs vram and min 4gigs 8gis vram isnt needed my friend plays gta5 at 65fps or so with a gtx770 just fine

get GTX 980, if you can stretch to Ti would be cool.

The_MoDiiFii3r wrote get GTX 980, if you can stretch to Ti would be cool.

980 is terrible it's got the worst price to performance since the Titan Z.

ᕙ༼ຈل͜ຈ༽ᕗ

Anyone realize that games will be come more advanced in the future? Sure, I could go with a 4gb card, but in 3 years I will be frustrated that I went with an 4gb card.

CoronaV5 wrote Anyone realize that games will be come more advanced in the future? Sure, I could go with a 4gb card, but in 3 years I will be frustrated that I went with an 4gb card.

More VRAM doesn't mean the card will last longer... In 3 years, current gen cards will be old, and having the extra 4GB of VRAM won't mean a thing.

_Skittle wrote

CoronaV5 wrote Anyone realize that games will be come more advanced in the future? Sure, I could go with a 4gb card, but in 3 years I will be frustrated that I went with an 4gb card.

More VRAM doesn't mean the card will last longer... In 3 years, current gen cards will be old, and having the extra 4GB of VRAM won't mean a thing.

Lmfao, and when the minimum requirements are 6gb?

CoronaV5 wrote

_Skittle wrote

CoronaV5 wrote Anyone realize that games will be come more advanced in the future? Sure, I could go with a 4gb card, but in 3 years I will be frustrated that I went with an 4gb card.

More VRAM doesn't mean the card will last longer... In 3 years, current gen cards will be old, and having the extra 4GB of VRAM won't mean a thing.

Lmfao, and when the minimum requirements are 6gb?

Clearly you dont understand. More VRAM doesnt mean better card. A 4gb 730 would be stomped by a 2gb 270 or something. You need alot more in a graphics card than VRAM buddy.

MagnaFlow wrote

CoronaV5 wrote

_Skittle wrote

CoronaV5 wrote Anyone realize that games will be come more advanced in the future? Sure, I could go with a 4gb card, but in 3 years I will be frustrated that I went with an 4gb card.

More VRAM doesn't mean the card will last longer... In 3 years, current gen cards will be old, and having the extra 4GB of VRAM won't mean a thing.

Lmfao, and when the minimum requirements are 6gb?

Clearly you dont understand. More VRAM doesnt mean better card. A 4gb 730 would be stomped by a 2gb 270 or something. You need alot more in a graphics card than VRAM buddy.

"Buddy" I am not basing a card with more VRAM to be better, I am clearly saying when you need to have 6gb to run a game, people will be screwed over when they have 4gb. Sure, you could run a game below requirements, but if you do not want constant FPS drops you should go over the requirements.

CoronaV5 wrote

MagnaFlow wrote

CoronaV5 wrote

_Skittle wrote

CoronaV5 wrote Anyone realize that games will be come more advanced in the future? Sure, I could go with a 4gb card, but in 3 years I will be frustrated that I went with an 4gb card.

More VRAM doesn't mean the card will last longer... In 3 years, current gen cards will be old, and having the extra 4GB of VRAM won't mean a thing.

Lmfao, and when the minimum requirements are 6gb?

Clearly you dont understand. More VRAM doesnt mean better card. A 4gb 730 would be stomped by a 2gb 270 or something. You need alot more in a graphics card than VRAM buddy.

"Buddy" I am not basing a card with more VRAM to be better, I am clearly saying when you need to have 6gb to run a game, people will be screwed over when they have 4gb. Sure, you could run a game below requirements, but if you do not want constant FPS drops you should go over the requirements.

Oh really? Is that why Shadow of mordor with "6gb requirement" runs max settings for me on my 970 at 1080p with a consistent 50-60 FPS? Games will not need any more than 4gb for single monitor gaming for another few years.

Lmfao loved to see your card on a dual monitor setup, it would be like a Mexican trying to support a family.