You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#11. Posted:
Cent
  • Moderator
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 19, 201211Year Member
Posts: 7,854
Reputation Power: 43776
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 19, 201211Year Member
Posts: 7,854
Reputation Power: 43776
Savitar wrote Yeah, these aren't bold at all. Majority of them will probably happen besides some of the FA predictions. Brady is going to retire within 2/3 years, don't see why you wouldn't draft a QB after they had to get rid of Jimmy G.

I don't think Jimmy Graham is gonna go to the Ravens. No way. Seahawks didn't utilize him what-so-ever and Baltimore won't either with their "elite" QB at the helm. He should go to Houston (since Fiedorowicz will prob retire if he's smart). Broncos is self explanatory, they are going to get Cousins. Chiefs I don't agree with. Probably will release Hali but keep Derrick Johnson around, just restructure or something.


Completely agree and I can sorta see the Earl trade happening for the Seahawks but I really hope it doesn't. Huge part of the defense and I would hate to see a member of the original LOB leave again.
#12. Posted:
3CH
  • Spooky Poster
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 02, 201112Year Member
Posts: 552
Reputation Power: 107
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 02, 201112Year Member
Posts: 552
Reputation Power: 107
2018 wrote
L33CH wrote
Blizzard wrote I don't think will keep nick foles TBH I think he's gonna be trade bait for draft picks

No reason to trade Foles when you can keep him and Wentz next year for less than half of what it cost to pay a QB these days


They will trade nick. That is a starting qb he has the potential to be a great qb. It will be a waster to have two amazing qbs and one only play. Nick will get traded, question is which team?

Again, dude. I literally just told you why he wouldn't be traded.
There is absolutely zero reason to trade him when Wentz just tore an ACL
Your reading comprehension needs work. There's nothing even proving they will trade Nick and its a done deal already?
Why? Because you're an NFL insider? lmao
#13. Posted:
QT
  • Blind Luck
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 30, 20149Year Member
Posts: 5,786
Reputation Power: 3284
Motto: QuikTrip
Motto: QuikTrip
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 30, 20149Year Member
Posts: 5,786
Reputation Power: 3284
Motto: QuikTrip
L33CH wrote
2018 wrote
L33CH wrote
Blizzard wrote I don't think will keep nick foles TBH I think he's gonna be trade bait for draft picks

No reason to trade Foles when you can keep him and Wentz next year for less than half of what it cost to pay a QB these days


They will trade nick. That is a starting qb he has the potential to be a great qb. It will be a waster to have two amazing qbs and one only play. Nick will get traded, question is which team?

Again, dude. I literally just told you why he wouldn't be traded.
There is absolutely zero reason to trade him when Wentz just tore an ACL
Your reading comprehension needs work. There's nothing even proving they will trade Nick and its a done deal already?
Why? Because you're an NFL insider? lmao


It is not a done deal. But I am just saying when Wentz gets healthy and gets his starting position back. Nick will demand release and/or trade to another team. He will not want to be a backup after winning SB MVP...
#14. Posted:
QT
  • E3 2016
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 30, 20149Year Member
Posts: 5,786
Reputation Power: 3284
Motto: QuikTrip
Motto: QuikTrip
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 30, 20149Year Member
Posts: 5,786
Reputation Power: 3284
Motto: QuikTrip
Cent wrote
Savitar wrote Yeah, these aren't bold at all. Majority of them will probably happen besides some of the FA predictions. Brady is going to retire within 2/3 years, don't see why you wouldn't draft a QB after they had to get rid of Jimmy G.

I don't think Jimmy Graham is gonna go to the Ravens. No way. Seahawks didn't utilize him what-so-ever and Baltimore won't either with their "elite" QB at the helm. He should go to Houston (since Fiedorowicz will prob retire if he's smart). Broncos is self explanatory, they are going to get Cousins. Chiefs I don't agree with. Probably will release Hali but keep Derrick Johnson around, just restructure or something.


Completely agree and I can sorta see the Earl trade happening for the Seahawks but I really hope it doesn't. Huge part of the defense and I would hate to see a member of the original LOB leave again.


I can see Earl getting trades to the cowboys for sure. Depends on what the cowboys want to give up though for him. I say wait until the draft, and draft some nice defense mostly corners and a safety. If they really want Earl they will give up too much for him.. That is just how the cowboys are.
#15. Posted:
Savitar
  • Winter 2016
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 04, 20158Year Member
Posts: 4,200
Reputation Power: 72
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 04, 20158Year Member
Posts: 4,200
Reputation Power: 72
Biwwy wrote
Savitar wrote Yeah, these aren't bold at all. Majority of them will probably happen besides some of the FA predictions. Brady is going to retire within 2/3 years, don't see why you wouldn't draft a QB after they had to get rid of Jimmy G.

I don't think Jimmy Graham is gonna go to the Ravens. No way. Seahawks didn't utilize him what-so-ever and Baltimore won't either with their "elite" QB at the helm. He should go to Houston (since Fiedorowicz will prob retire if he's smart). Broncos is self explanatory, they are going to get Cousins. Chiefs I don't agree with. Probably will release Hali but keep Derrick Johnson around, just restructure or something.


I hope we get Jimmy and this "elite" QB you're talking about lol it doesn't exist.

Flacco is good but not perfect.
It's a meme. Flacco isn't elite. He's just bad.






Completely agree and I can sorta see the Earl trade happening for the Seahawks but I really hope it doesn't. Huge part of the defense and I would hate to see a member of the original LOB leave again.
I honestly doubt that. Safeties like Earl Thomas always play extremely well throughout their 30s and considering what you'd get for him (maybe a 1st and 4th), it's not worth it. He said he wanted to go to the Cowboys once his career is essentially almost over and not many teams want him anymore. If they traded him, I'd be shocked. Because there is no reason to. You will not find another safety like him (probably a HOFer) in the draft unless you want to use a first round pick on Derwin James who may or may not become as good as he is, and that's if he falls and that's also if they even use a first round pick this year, and not with the holes on the team already (OLB, WR, DE, OL).
#16. Posted:
3CH
  • Spooky Poster
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 02, 201112Year Member
Posts: 552
Reputation Power: 107
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 02, 201112Year Member
Posts: 552
Reputation Power: 107
2018 wrote
L33CH wrote
2018 wrote
L33CH wrote
Blizzard wrote I don't think will keep nick foles TBH I think he's gonna be trade bait for draft picks

No reason to trade Foles when you can keep him and Wentz next year for less than half of what it cost to pay a QB these days


They will trade nick. That is a starting qb he has the potential to be a great qb. It will be a waster to have two amazing qbs and one only play. Nick will get traded, question is which team?

Again, dude. I literally just told you why he wouldn't be traded.
There is absolutely zero reason to trade him when Wentz just tore an ACL
Your reading comprehension needs work. There's nothing even proving they will trade Nick and its a done deal already?
Why? Because you're an NFL insider? lmao


It is not a done deal. But I am just saying when Wentz gets healthy and gets his starting position back. Nick will demand release and/or trade to another team. He will not want to be a backup after winning SB MVP...

Guess what? You can demand whatever you want.
When a team controls your rights, it's the TEAM decision whether to keep, cut, or trade you.
The Eagles GM set this up perfectly, and on purpose. Started with Bradford/Daniels and slowly worked into this.
He's very smart, and won't let a backup QB try to leverage his future because he's just that, a back up.
The only way Foles goes is if the Eagles get a Bradford esq offer which they will not considering Foles' track record as a starter.
Lets not forget he was just using RPOs 58.7% of the time in their recent run with Nick,
Doug Pederson deserves more credit than Foles' for that run hands down.
#17. Posted:
QT
  • TTG Undisputed
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 30, 20149Year Member
Posts: 5,786
Reputation Power: 3284
Motto: QuikTrip
Motto: QuikTrip
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 30, 20149Year Member
Posts: 5,786
Reputation Power: 3284
Motto: QuikTrip
L33CH wrote
2018 wrote
L33CH wrote
2018 wrote
L33CH wrote
Blizzard wrote I don't think will keep nick foles TBH I think he's gonna be trade bait for draft picks

No reason to trade Foles when you can keep him and Wentz next year for less than half of what it cost to pay a QB these days


They will trade nick. That is a starting qb he has the potential to be a great qb. It will be a waster to have two amazing qbs and one only play. Nick will get traded, question is which team?

Again, dude. I literally just told you why he wouldn't be traded.
There is absolutely zero reason to trade him when Wentz just tore an ACL
Your reading comprehension needs work. There's nothing even proving they will trade Nick and its a done deal already?
Why? Because you're an NFL insider? lmao


It is not a done deal. But I am just saying when Wentz gets healthy and gets his starting position back. Nick will demand release and/or trade to another team. He will not want to be a backup after winning SB MVP...

Guess what? You can demand whatever you want.
When a team controls your rights, it's the TEAM decision whether to keep, cut, or trade you.
The Eagles GM set this up perfectly, and on purpose. Started with Bradford/Daniels and slowly worked into this.
He's very smart, and won't let a backup QB try to leverage his future because he's just that, a back up.
The only way Foles goes is if the Eagles get a Bradford esq offer which they will not considering Foles' track record as a starter.
Lets not forget he was just using RPOs 58.7% of the time in their recent run with Nick,
Doug Pederson deserves more credit than Foles' for that run hands down.


He isnt a back up.. He does not play like a back up and for when it counted the most he was a starter and was really good at it. He will get traded. Just watch.
#18. Posted:
3CH
  • Spooky Poster
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 02, 201112Year Member
Posts: 552
Reputation Power: 107
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 02, 201112Year Member
Posts: 552
Reputation Power: 107
2018 wrote
L33CH wrote
2018 wrote
L33CH wrote
2018 wrote
L33CH wrote
Blizzard wrote I don't think will keep nick foles TBH I think he's gonna be trade bait for draft picks

No reason to trade Foles when you can keep him and Wentz next year for less than half of what it cost to pay a QB these days


They will trade nick. That is a starting qb he has the potential to be a great qb. It will be a waster to have two amazing qbs and one only play. Nick will get traded, question is which team?

Again, dude. I literally just told you why he wouldn't be traded.
There is absolutely zero reason to trade him when Wentz just tore an ACL
Your reading comprehension needs work. There's nothing even proving they will trade Nick and its a done deal already?
Why? Because you're an NFL insider? lmao


It is not a done deal. But I am just saying when Wentz gets healthy and gets his starting position back. Nick will demand release and/or trade to another team. He will not want to be a backup after winning SB MVP...

Guess what? You can demand whatever you want.
When a team controls your rights, it's the TEAM decision whether to keep, cut, or trade you.
The Eagles GM set this up perfectly, and on purpose. Started with Bradford/Daniels and slowly worked into this.
He's very smart, and won't let a backup QB try to leverage his future because he's just that, a back up.
The only way Foles goes is if the Eagles get a Bradford esq offer which they will not considering Foles' track record as a starter.
Lets not forget he was just using RPOs 58.7% of the time in their recent run with Nick,
Doug Pederson deserves more credit than Foles' for that run hands down.


He isnt a back up.. He does not play like a back up and for when it counted the most he was a starter and was really good at it. He will get traded. Just watch.

Except he won't, and he doesn't play like a starter but for a the latest stretch of his career with possibly the best offensive play caller in the league. Nick deserves so little credit its not even funny. He's a career back up, and he's gonna be a backup all next year until someone over pays him like many over rated backup's before him (ala Matt Cassle)
#19. Posted:
Cent
  • Moderator
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 19, 201211Year Member
Posts: 7,854
Reputation Power: 43776
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 19, 201211Year Member
Posts: 7,854
Reputation Power: 43776
Savitar wrote
Biwwy wrote
Savitar wrote Yeah, these aren't bold at all. Majority of them will probably happen besides some of the FA predictions. Brady is going to retire within 2/3 years, don't see why you wouldn't draft a QB after they had to get rid of Jimmy G.

I don't think Jimmy Graham is gonna go to the Ravens. No way. Seahawks didn't utilize him what-so-ever and Baltimore won't either with their "elite" QB at the helm. He should go to Houston (since Fiedorowicz will prob retire if he's smart). Broncos is self explanatory, they are going to get Cousins. Chiefs I don't agree with. Probably will release Hali but keep Derrick Johnson around, just restructure or something.


I hope we get Jimmy and this "elite" QB you're talking about lol it doesn't exist.

Flacco is good but not perfect.
It's a meme. Flacco isn't elite. He's just bad.






Completely agree and I can sorta see the Earl trade happening for the Seahawks but I really hope it doesn't. Huge part of the defense and I would hate to see a member of the original LOB leave again.
I honestly doubt that. Safeties like Earl Thomas always play extremely well throughout their 30s and considering what you'd get for him (maybe a 1st and 4th), it's not worth it. He said he wanted to go to the Cowboys once his career is essentially almost over and not many teams want him anymore. If they traded him, I'd be shocked. Because there is no reason to. You will not find another safety like him (probably a HOFer) in the draft unless you want to use a first round pick on Derwin James who may or may not become as good as he is, and that's if he falls and that's also if they even use a first round pick this year, and not with the holes on the team already (OLB, WR, DE, OL).


Hopefully he stays then, I could see them keeping him and attempting to get an OL or WR for sure. Earl is one of my favorites by far so it would be really nice if he stayed.
#20. Posted:
Savitar
  • E3 2017
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 04, 20158Year Member
Posts: 4,200
Reputation Power: 72
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 04, 20158Year Member
Posts: 4,200
Reputation Power: 72
Cent wrote
Savitar wrote
Biwwy wrote
Savitar wrote Yeah, these aren't bold at all. Majority of them will probably happen besides some of the FA predictions. Brady is going to retire within 2/3 years, don't see why you wouldn't draft a QB after they had to get rid of Jimmy G.

I don't think Jimmy Graham is gonna go to the Ravens. No way. Seahawks didn't utilize him what-so-ever and Baltimore won't either with their "elite" QB at the helm. He should go to Houston (since Fiedorowicz will prob retire if he's smart). Broncos is self explanatory, they are going to get Cousins. Chiefs I don't agree with. Probably will release Hali but keep Derrick Johnson around, just restructure or something.


I hope we get Jimmy and this "elite" QB you're talking about lol it doesn't exist.

Flacco is good but not perfect.
It's a meme. Flacco isn't elite. He's just bad.






Completely agree and I can sorta see the Earl trade happening for the Seahawks but I really hope it doesn't. Huge part of the defense and I would hate to see a member of the original LOB leave again.
I honestly doubt that. Safeties like Earl Thomas always play extremely well throughout their 30s and considering what you'd get for him (maybe a 1st and 4th), it's not worth it. He said he wanted to go to the Cowboys once his career is essentially almost over and not many teams want him anymore. If they traded him, I'd be shocked. Because there is no reason to. You will not find another safety like him (probably a HOFer) in the draft unless you want to use a first round pick on Derwin James who may or may not become as good as he is, and that's if he falls and that's also if they even use a first round pick this year, and not with the holes on the team already (OLB, WR, DE, OL).


Hopefully he stays then, I could see them keeping him and attempting to get an OL or WR for sure. Earl is one of my favorites by far so it would be really nice if he stayed.
I think it'd be more worth to just trade down in the draft and try to get a big-bodied WR to replace Graham instead of trading ET for one and a pick. This year is also a pretty good OL class so we'll see. Since Tom Cable is gone, the OL should see significant improvement anyways. It's a pretty good year to be optimistic about though, they should actually be fun to watch this time around.
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.