Next Call of Duty reveal by E3, Activision community manager suggests

4.5
Activision social media manager Dan Amrich has said he expects 2013's entry in the Call of Duty series, which may be Modern Warfare 4, to be revealed no later than E3 in early June.

Speaking to fans in a YouTube video, he said: "We're still deep in the middle of the Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 cycle and there's still a lot more content to come, so you can understand why Activision hasn't really talked about next year yet, but they're going to have to soon, because E3 is coming up."
Amrich noted that the last two Call of Duty games were revealed in May 2011 and May 2012.

"If you're looking for information on the future, it's coming soon, it's just not here yet, it should be here no later than E3," he said.

"We also have the interesting problem of new hardware coming in. We've got a PS4, we've got whatever Xbox is working on - is that going to be this year, I don't know."

Last year, a CV belonging to an Infinity Ward software engineer suggested that the studio's next Call of Duty game will release on both current and next-gen consoles.

It has been heavily rumoured that Microsoft will reveal the next-gen Xbox at an as-yet-unannounced event on May 21, and given the platform holder's strong business ties to Activision's series, it wouldn't be surprising to hear some information about the next Call of Duty game around the same time.

Posted:
Related Forum: Gaming Discussion

Source: http://www.computerandvideogames.com/401998/next-call-of-duty-reveal-by-e3-activision-community-manager-suggests/

Comments

"Next Call of Duty reveal by E3, Activision community manager suggests" :: Login/Create an Account :: 123 comments

If you would like to post a comment please signin to your account or register for an account.

CheeseStuffedPizzaPosted:

They need to stop with Call of Duty and start a new franchise.

WhirlpoolPosted:

Can't wait till this game comes out. I hope that make it like MW2

DopestDope_EvaPosted:

YAY another game which is the same same as the other 23290482093 CoD games that are out already..

carlos-Posted:

Regardless on what everybody is thinking, statistics show that the CoD competitive community is growing. For the championship we had over 400,000k viewers and the MLG Dallas championship for CoD viewer ship grew big time. Everything you guys says are opinions, yet their is statistics that show competitive CoD is growing. It's good that Treyarch listen to the competitive community then the whole community in general because we know how to play the game, not sit in corner with a shock charge on the floor and camp all game. Like I said before those that put CoD down are the ones who will still buy/rent/ or play the game at some point of their life time.

tehOnlyRealPosted:

Want master prestige send "Simply Mizu" a message saying MP

AzarePosted:

BF is just to play with friends and play big games, it's not competitive because it has no competitive gameplay.

BONDGUY8514697Posted:

fknvlink
Literacy
Except CoD has a $100,000 tournament for the competitive gamers, something that the Battlefield community will never get. And some of the Halo competitive players cry because their game can't get $100,000 tournament. The game takes team work to win not individual skill. Just like in real life you get things done as a team.
first it is 1,000,000 not 100,000. second dota 2 has a 1 million dollar tournament and it is free to play and in beta.
CoD can't and will not be competitive. it will never compare to counterstrike in skill nor competitiveness. its on a god damn controller and has sticky aim. some skill...




Azare
fknvlink
Literacy
Except CoD has a $100,000 tournament for the competitive gamers, something that the Battlefield community will never get. And some of the Halo competitive players cry because their game can't get $100,000 tournament. The game takes team work to win not individual skill. Just like in real life you get things done as a team.
first it is 1,000,000 not 100,000. second dota 2 has a 1 million dollar tournament and it is free to play and in beta.
CoD can't and will not be competitive. it will never compare to counterstrike in skill nor competitiveness. its on a god damn controller and has sticky aim. some skill...


Coming from an ex-semi pro player from CS, I agree. CoD will never be as competitive or skill-based as CS, but it has its own thing going, and it's not too bad. I enjoy playing and watching competitive CoD.


I agree that CS will always be more competitive. But, the reason that Battlefield doesn't have a contest like that is because Battlefield is no where near as competitive as those other games. Out of all of these though I do prefer Battlefield. I am not a person who get's into watching those type's of tournaments. Besides, before we know it the only people in the competition will be a bunch of 12 year-olds! Just kidding. I've met more people that seem like they are in their 20's then little immature kids. CoD and CS are still both fun to play though!

SnugPosted:

Why do they feel the need to release a game every year

DanimalsPosted:

i cant wait. im getting this for sure.

AzarePosted:

fknvlink
Literacy
Except CoD has a $100,000 tournament for the competitive gamers, something that the Battlefield community will never get. And some of the Halo competitive players cry because their game can't get $100,000 tournament. The game takes team work to win not individual skill. Just like in real life you get things done as a team.
first it is 1,000,000 not 100,000. second dota 2 has a 1 million dollar tournament and it is free to play and in beta.
CoD can't and will not be competitive. it will never compare to counterstrike in skill nor competitiveness. its on a god damn controller and has sticky aim. some skill...


Coming from an ex-semi pro player from CS, I agree. CoD will never be as competitive or skill-based as CS, but it has its own thing going, and it's not too bad. I enjoy playing and watching competitive CoD.