Battlefield 3 Vs Modern Warfare 3 Gameplay Trailers Compared

4.5
With recent launch of the Modern Warfare 3 trailer much criticism is drawn with a comparison to Battlefield 3. The question has been repeatedly asked can the aging Call Of Duty game engine deliver the graphics gamers now deserve.

One comparison that can be lifted from the two is the scene of the building collapsing in an almost identical fashion. Attached is a video comparison to see whether the Frostbite 2.0 engine is as good as it seems. Watch the video and judge, judge who is copying who. Looks like there is a little too much in common with these trailers.
Look for yourself.



Posted:

Source: http://onlinegamernews.net/news/battlefield-3-vs-modern-warfare-3-graphics-comparison

Comments

"Battlefield 3 Vs Modern Warfare 3 Gameplay Trailers Compared" :: Login/Create an Account :: 53 comments

If you would like to post a comment please signin to your account or register for an account.

ChainedBaKeR184Posted:

COD is not good just wait after a month there will be lobbies and hacks. now play WaW there are modders in every game. next go to the first battle field and play. there are no mods at all. that is one reason COD sucks. and the next is you cant camp in battle field but you can in COD. battle field takes skill to level up and its harder to unlike cod. on black ops i can get over a prestige in one weekend thats how easy it is. go play B2. it is very much harder to level up Well you can if you snipe haha! But its not that hard to kill a sniper in BF soooo yeah..........BF forever!

ReconPosted:

_TTG-HAGGIS_ Both games are good
both games i will get

B3 will not be hacked and people will play and not b1tch

MW3 will get hacked, people will b1tch and complain, and wish the got B3

In my opinion i would rather have B3 since EA has really good servers and dosent allow mods ATOLL, Than play MW3 were there WILL be mods and get pwnd by not having them or b1tched at for having them

B3 WILL BE A BETTER GAME, BUT MW3 WILL SELL MORE JUST CAUSE OF THE COD FRANCHISE

:D


totally true, i do like them both too, but too me Dice and other guys that make BF actually spend alot more money then Infinity Ward/Sledgehammers, because i say that is they did spend the money to create an new engine, that looks awesome, and also spends more money on the servers, they actually host them, not the whole host migration thing that mw2 had.

Also i ONLY know like 3-4 states of sales so fare, only really the pre orders that BF3 has actually 4 times as much as mw3. Yes i know that mw3 just released a trailer of some gameplay(Horrible) but still that kind explains it...

So BF3 all the way, even though im getting both...

TTG_JAWZxPosted:

Thers's a big difference dice has there new engine i cant wait to woop some a** in bf3 but, yet again mw3 will be good to there 2 completely different games.One is bf3 realist more players less lag no host just play mw3 base off of m2 "cod4" u lag u hav poeple where they just rage qut dashboard u dnt hav 2 think about people doing that on bf3 it just keeps going and thats the thing with these 2 games there completely difference in my prospective.:D

ClutchMasterDeePosted:

COD is not good just wait after a month there will be lobbies and hacks. now play WaW there are modders in every game. next go to the first battle field and play. there are no mods at all. that is one reason COD sucks. and the next is you cant camp in battle field but you can in COD. battle field takes skill to level up and its harder to unlike cod. on black ops i can get over a prestige in one weekend thats how easy it is. go play B2. it is very much harder to level up

pyroboy926Posted:

ZAttack7 So Battlefield 3 posted a 12 minute "GAMEPLAY" video two months ago and Modern Warfare 3 releases a crappy reveal "TRAILER" a couple days ago with no gameplay? We can already see BF3 is gonna be better than MW3 since Bad Company 2 was a great game and IW/3arc can't seem to make a good Call of Duty game after CoD 4.
Well the part of "IW/3arc" is wrong. A new company named Sledgehammer Games will be making MW3 since IW is bankrupt and 3arc just made the last one.

ZAttack7Posted:

So Battlefield 3 posted a 12 minute "GAMEPLAY" video two months ago and Modern Warfare 3 releases a crappy reveal "TRAILER" a couple days ago with no gameplay? We can already see BF3 is gonna be better than MW3 since Bad Company 2 was a great game and IW/3arc can't seem to make a good Call of Duty game after CoD 4.

shadow1Posted:

TTGDerankedCod4 *0:48


The BF3 trailer is like 2 months old. Of course its not going to be moving because its new. Wait a while and it will move.

TTGDerankedCod4Posted:

*0:48

TTGDerankedCod4Posted:

Lol at 0:43 the belt doesnt move on bf3, already failed.

_TTG-HAGGIS_Posted:

iPatobo I like both game series',but honestly here is details:

BF trailer - Not console footage,console will be much lower quality as they have stated that it was on PC,more than likely using the very very top tech.

MW3 trailer - Actually Xbox 360 footage showing you what you have coming + months of polishing.

MW3 will have a more engaging multiplayer than BF,along with probably also having much more people online.

And it will more than likely massacre Battlefield on sales,which at the end of the day determains the success of a game.

The hype for MW3 is above BF,just look at the views of it's reveal trailers/teasers.

I'll be getting both,but BF for Jtag only,I'll actually buy MW3.


Yes B3 trailer is PC but it will lose some graphics

but if you believe anygame looks the trailer :FACEPALM:

These are all theatrical and wont resemble actual game footage