I mean I don't think they should be kicked for doing terrible but maybe a little more accurately match made based on skill level and kd and such

No, they are just trying to have fun just like everyone else. I hate when I get bad teammates too but I don't think they should be kicked or penalized for being bad at something.

Bad team mates just mean more kills for mee haha, but if your gonna complain about team mates and that they should be penalised have you ever thought off actually playing with a team off people? Might solve your issue

they shouldnt be kicked just for not being good, but they should at skilled matchmaking so they play more of the people on their level

You should be penalized for not playing the objective in any objective game mode.

It doesn't really come down to being bad players, I've played Domination where players have gone 6-20 but they have 3+ captures. Other times I've seen guys go 30-5 with 0 captures. I get it if you're a slayer type player, that's fine. As long as you're keeping them off of flags, I'm cool.

But there should be some sort of penalty for not playing the objective. It doesn't even have to be anything major. I just wish the game would notice and reward players who play the objective. Poor guys in Hardpoint go 10-30 with two minutes on the Hardpoint, and still end up at the bottom of the team. That's bullshit.

What a dumb post.

Not everyone that plays any game is good at it straight away.

wponx wrote You should be penalized for not playing the objective in any objective game mode.

It doesn't really come down to being bad players, I've played Domination where players have gone 6-20 but they have 3+ captures. Other times I've seen guys go 30-5 with 0 captures. I get it if you're a slayer type player, that's fine. As long as you're keeping them off of flags, I'm cool.

But there should be some sort of penalty for not playing the objective. It doesn't even have to be anything major. I just wish the game would
notice and reward players who play the objective. Poor guys in Hardpoint go 10-30 with two minutes on the Hardpoint, and still end up at the bottom of the team. That's bullshit.

I see it different. If you are a slayer like you said you can help the team by keeping the other team pushed back and constantly applying pressure to them. In HP you can slay around the hill and let the people who aren't good at killing in the hill. People bash slayers cause they don't have hill time or captures but they probably do most of the work allowing the team to win.

ing wrote

wponx wrote You should be penalized for not playing the objective in any objective game mode.

It doesn't really come down to being bad players, I've played Domination where players have gone 6-20 but they have 3+ captures. Other times I've seen guys go 30-5 with 0 captures. I get it if you're a slayer type player, that's fine. As long as you're keeping them off of flags, I'm cool.

But there should be some sort of penalty for not playing the objective. It doesn't even have to be anything major. I just wish the game would
notice and reward players who play the objective. Poor guys in Hardpoint go 10-30 with two minutes on the Hardpoint, and still end up at the bottom of the team. That's bullshit.

I see it different. If you are a slayer like you said you can help the team by keeping the other team pushed back and constantly applying pressure to them. In HP you can slay around the hill and let the people who aren't good at killing in the hill. People bash slayers cause they don't have hill time or captures but they probably do most of the work allowing the team to win.

Like I said, I'm fine with that. If your team is winning, and you're keeping the other team away from the HP and flags, more power to you. Keep going.

However, I don't believe someone with 0 time on the HP should be above someone with 2 minutes on the end game leaderboard. Reward objective play. That was the entire point of my post. I apologize if it came off as I was bashing slayer style players.

wponx wrote

ing wrote

wponx wrote You should be penalized for not playing the objective in any objective game mode.

It doesn't really come down to being bad players, I've played Domination where players have gone 6-20 but they have 3+ captures. Other times I've seen guys go 30-5 with 0 captures. I get it if you're a slayer type player, that's fine. As long as you're keeping them off of flags, I'm cool.

But there should be some sort of penalty for not playing the objective. It doesn't even have to be anything major. I just wish the game would
notice and reward players who play the objective. Poor guys in Hardpoint go 10-30 with two minutes on the Hardpoint, and still end up at the bottom of the team. That's bullshit.

I see it different. If you are a slayer like you said you can help the team by keeping the other team pushed back and constantly applying pressure to them. In HP you can slay around the hill and let the people who aren't good at killing in the hill. People bash slayers cause they don't have hill time or captures but they probably do most of the work allowing the team to win.

Like I said, I'm fine with that. If your team is winning, and you're keeping the other team away from the HP and flags, more power to you. Keep going.

However, I don't believe someone with 0 time on the HP should be above someone with 2 minutes on the end game leaderboard. Reward objective play. That was the entire point of my post. I apologize if it came off as I was bashing slayer style players.

No no I understand where you are coming from but the game leaderboards are based on score so the more kills/assists and other ways of getting points means you will be on top rather than just sitting on the hill or capping flags only.