LovesToHelp wrote Nice guns man. I wish I could have some but its not allowed in uk :/

I carry knifes but thats still illegal :/:/

Wow you are either lying or seriously **** stupid.

LovesToHelp wrote Nice guns man. I wish I could have some but its not allowed in uk :/

I carry knifes but thats still illegal :/:/

People like you are the reason that I'm completely against guns. People that are incapable of using simple grammar and punctuation, yet are able to legally purchase lethal weapons that are capable of ending many lives.

Why would you ever want to carry around a knife for the purpose of defending yourself?

Motivational wrote

LovesToHelp wrote Nice guns man. I wish I could have some but its not allowed in uk :/

I carry knifes but thats still illegal :/:/

People like you are the reason that I'm completely against guns. People that are incapable of using simple grammar and punctuation, yet are able to legally purchase lethal weapons that are capable of ending many lives.

Why would you ever want to carry around a knife for the purpose of defending yourself?

I don't know, grammar and guns have nothing to do with each other. If you know how to safely own and operate a firearm I see no issue with you owning one.

I always wanted to own HK G36C. I really love that gun. But UK laws of course.

002 wrote

Motivational wrote

LovesToHelp wrote Nice guns man. I wish I could have some but its not allowed in uk :/

I carry knifes but thats still illegal :/:/

People like you are the reason that I'm completely against guns. People that are incapable of using simple grammar and punctuation, yet are able to legally purchase lethal weapons that are capable of ending many lives.

Why would you ever want to carry around a knife for the purpose of defending yourself?

I don't know, grammar and guns have nothing to do with each other. If you know how to safely own and operate a firearm I see no issue with you owning one.

If you can't construct a basic sentence in your native language that you've been taught in school, eight hours a day, for fifteen years of education then you can't safely operate a gun. It's that simple.

Most of these guys that do the school shootings and stuff have a list of mental disorders and have a low intelligence. However they got their hands on a gun amazes me.

Motivational wrote

002 wrote

Motivational wrote

LovesToHelp wrote Nice guns man. I wish I could have some but its not allowed in uk :/

I carry knifes but thats still illegal :/:/

People like you are the reason that I'm completely against guns. People that are incapable of using simple grammar and punctuation, yet are able to legally purchase lethal weapons that are capable of ending many lives.

Why would you ever want to carry around a knife for the purpose of defending yourself?

I don't know, grammar and guns have nothing to do with each other. If you know how to safely own and operate a firearm I see no issue with you owning one.

If you can't construct a basic sentence in your native language that you've been taught in school, eight hours a day, for fifteen years of education then you can't safely operate a gun. It's that simple.

Most of these guys that do the school shootings and stuff have a list of mental disorders and have a low intelligence. However they got their hands on a gun amazes me.

I bet if we met in person you'd think I shouldn't own a gun lol. I'm just a redneck hillbilly who talks like I was raised in the South.

All in all this is a gaming site full of kids where grammar isn't really needed. I promise you though, you don't need great grammar to own a gun. You just need to know the basics of reading writing. Past that, commas and capitalization are not really needed. When it comes to the English language, we all know it's a pretty hard one to learn. Some kids raised by parents who don't speak English have a tough time with it because English isn't the native tongue spoken.

When knife is plural it becomes knives. The poster said he was from the UK so he had a basic education and is no exception to what I said. Of course if you have no education but you've got common sense and can differentiate between right and wrong then that's fine. But we're dealing with someone who says that they carry knives around with them which is both ridiculous and can land you a long prison sentence in the UK. According to the law, possession of a knife can carry a prison sentence of up to 4 years even if it's not used. And he said he carries multiple knives.

When I was talking about his intelligence, I was more pointing towards the fact that he's actually breaking an extremely serious law and feels that by having a knife he can protect himself. If someone is coming at you with a knife, having a knife fight with them is far more of a disadvantage than using your bare hands, considering you wont end up in prison for possession of a lethal weapon or even worse taking someone's life.

Irrelevant of your intelligence, if you need a gun to hunt and you live in the country or near a hunting area then that's fine but the idea that people should buy them specifically to carry around for protection if they're just average citizens and are in no threat is crazy to me. That puts the phrase taking the law into your own hands into an entirely different light.

I was simply saying that if you can't type a full sentence in your native language and you've received a full education then you're clearly not the sharpest tool in the shed and shouldn't be allowed a lethal weapon, especially if you're not going to use it for hunting but for hurting another human.

killerboy53 wrote

Illustrated wrote

killerboy53 wrote My opinion on guns;
They don't need to be banned, but it should be harder to get one. It's way to easy to get a gun now days.
And why do you need them anyways? Can't you fight with bare hands or what?

who the hell uses a gun for normal fighting?
Because yes if some huge dude with a gun, or knife, or even only his hands, is trying to kill you... Your logic is just fight with your hands?
While a larger guy might be able to handle a fight with a large guy, a smaller guy couldn't. That's where the escalation of force is justified.

Ever heard of martial arts or defense sports?

As if everyone has the time or physical ability to take martial arts classes?
I work a full time job, and go to college part time.
Tell me how I would fit some pointless martial arts classes into my schedule...

In a realistic situation, hand to hand self defense classes are pointless.
Because more than likely, if I need to defend myself that urgently, the opponent has a weapon.
And you're more likely to get shot or stabbed trying to disarm them, than if you were to just scare them off with your own weapon.
You're a fool for believing that kind of stuff would work.

Illustrated wrote

killerboy53 wrote

Illustrated wrote

killerboy53 wrote My opinion on guns;
They don't need to be banned, but it should be harder to get one. It's way to easy to get a gun now days.
And why do you need them anyways? Can't you fight with bare hands or what?

who the hell uses a gun for normal fighting?
Because yes if some huge dude with a gun, or knife, or even only his hands, is trying to kill you... Your logic is just fight with your hands?
While a larger guy might be able to handle a fight with a large guy, a smaller guy couldn't. That's where the escalation of force is justified.

Ever heard of martial arts or defense sports?

As if everyone has the time or physical ability to take martial arts classes?
I work a full time job, and go to college part time.
Tell me how I would fit some pointless martial arts classes into my schedule...

In a realistic situation, hand to hand self defense classes are pointless.
Because more than likely, if I need to defend myself that urgently, the opponent has a weapon.
And you're more likely to get shot or stabbed trying to disarm them, than if you were to just scare them off with your own weapon.
You're a fool for believing that kind of stuff would work.

If guns are banned the chance is small to get an opponent with a gun as well.
So that didn't make any sense.

If this was true the UK wouldn't have the most gun crime in the EU and Chicago wouldn't have the most gun crime in America.