You need to read more, and not conspiracy websites or Alex Jones..

Also, the Swastika was actually a symbol of good fortune, and all of Germany loved and adored Hitler. So of Hitler was as bad as you've been deceived into believing, than why would all of Germany love him so much?..

We projected that image onto him, just like we do with every good guy, because our satanic government doesn't want you having a true savior, nor do they want you know the truth that every HU-man is a God.. Hu in Sanskrit, means god!..

And yes, even White people are Gods, not that Black victim mentality that's been going around.. And Trump is not Super Racist, because that's a double standard..

Richmyster wrote You need to read more, and not conspiracy websites or Alex Jones..

Also, the Swastika was actually a symbol of good fortune, and all of Germany loved and adored Hitler. So of Hitler was as bad as you've been deceived into believing, than why would all of Germany love him so much?..

We projected that image onto him, just like we do with every good guy, because our satanic government doesn't want you having a true savior, nor do they want you know the truth that every HU-man is a God.. Hu in Sanskrit, means god!..

And yes, even White people are Gods, not that Black victim mentality that's been going around.. And Trump is not Super Racist, because that's a double standard..

I don't believe that Hitler and Trump are comparable, so we agree that the original topic is probably wrong, but I disagree with your conclusions about Hitler and Sanskrit semantics influencing reality.

The swastika was a symbol of good fortune, but the meaning of a symbol changes depending on what it is being used to represent.
As an example, if I were to go out and murder 20 people with a swastika painted on my back, would that mean that what I did was good, would it mean that I was a good luck totem for those people?
If we're using your logic, yes.

All of Germany loved Hitler so much because they were desperate. The Treaty of Versailles left the German people in economic ruin. Hitler provided a scape-goat in the Jewish population and offered a solution to that problem. He was also an excellent orator which didn't exactly hurt his image.
Not to mention the propaganda and lack of information about what was really going on.

No dictator has ever been elected by a population which didn't like them.
By your logic, no elected dictator who has ever done horrible things could ever be considered a bad person because the people would not have elected them if they were bad people.
That is simply demonstrably wrong and if you don't think that is the case then you will find yourself trying to defend every abhorrent, democratically elected, dictator in recorded history.

We didn't project a bad image onto Hitler. He was just a bad person. Bad people exist. If Hitler was a 'true savior' or any 'good guy' was a true savior, why would this savior let any Earthly Government get in their way. If they let a simple government ruin their image so much that they are now regarded as one of the most vile men in history by the vast majority of historians then they obviously weren't a 'True savior.'

You like to play with semantics to get definitions which support your hypotheses. OK. How about this then?
If you trace back the etymology of the word 'Human' to its actual inception, the entire word, it goes like this:

Modern Day: Human
Middle English/Old French: Humaine
Latin: Humanus
Early Latin: Homo

There we go, that must prove it. God loves Homosexuals, using this logic he might even be one.
Why else would 'God' in Sanskrit have its origins in the word Homo? Using your logic that makes complete sense.
You're convinced by this, right? No? Oh. I don't blame you because semantics have no bearing on reality.

You're not a God, you're a regular human being.

I don't agree with this, although it is negative attention he still gets himself out there. To me it seems to be a publicity stunt type deal

This Topic has sky rocketed thanks