You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#51. Posted:
Donald_Trump
  • Winter 2022
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 02, 201112Year Member
Posts: 2,871
Reputation Power: 815
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 02, 201112Year Member
Posts: 2,871
Reputation Power: 815
The philosophy of gun control: Teenagers are roaring through the town at 90mph while the speed limit is 25mph. The solution is to lower the limit to 20mph? No.


RIP to the victims and anybody involved.

Do you think that ISIS is not going to attack America if we implemented strict gun laws?
#52. Posted:
ProfessorNobody
  • Winter 2017
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 07, 201211Year Member
Posts: 3,732
Reputation Power: 362
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 07, 201211Year Member
Posts: 3,732
Reputation Power: 362
SELU wrote The philosophy of gun control: Teenagers are roaring through the town at 90mph while the speed limit is 25mph. The solution is to lower the limit to 20mph? No.


Your analogy doesn't make sense.
In the context of gun control, the answer to that situation would be to increase the stringency of the rules and regulations put in place for the purchasing of a car and getting a license.
Unfortunately, with cars, there is no way to say whether or not someone is likely to speed around after they get their license.

Gun control is not the same.
If you increase the background and mental health checks on people who try to buy guns you can say with confidence that the amount of shootings will decrease.
#53. Posted:
Donald_Trump
  • Winter 2017
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 02, 201112Year Member
Posts: 2,871
Reputation Power: 815
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 02, 201112Year Member
Posts: 2,871
Reputation Power: 815
Duderino wrote
SELU wrote The philosophy of gun control: Teenagers are roaring through the town at 90mph while the speed limit is 25mph. The solution is to lower the limit to 20mph? No.


Your analogy doesn't make sense.
In the context of gun control, the answer to that situation would be to increase the stringency of the rules and regulations put in place for the purchasing of a car and getting a license.
Unfortunately, with cars, there is no way to say whether or not someone is likely to speed around after they get their license.

Gun control is not the same.
If you increase the background and mental health checks on people who try to buy guns you can say with confidence that the amount of shootings will decrease.


Can you say the same with guns? with guns, there is no way to say whether or not someone is likely to commit murder after they buy it.
#54. Posted:
ProfessorNobody
  • Shoutbox Hero
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 07, 201211Year Member
Posts: 3,732
Reputation Power: 362
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 07, 201211Year Member
Posts: 3,732
Reputation Power: 362
SELU wrote
Duderino wrote
SELU wrote The philosophy of gun control: Teenagers are roaring through the town at 90mph while the speed limit is 25mph. The solution is to lower the limit to 20mph? No.


Your analogy doesn't make sense.
In the context of gun control, the answer to that situation would be to increase the stringency of the rules and regulations put in place for the purchasing of a car and getting a license.
Unfortunately, with cars, there is no way to say whether or not someone is likely to speed around after they get their license.

Gun control is not the same.
If you increase the background and mental health checks on people who try to buy guns you can say with confidence that the amount of shootings will decrease.


Can you say the same with guns? with guns, there is no way to say whether or not someone is likely to commit murder after they buy it.


When you're talking about what is likely you're talking about probabilities. Saying that someone is going to buy a gun is one order of magnitude of probability that they will commit murder. Adding that this someone has a mental health issue is one more order of magnitude. Adding that this someone has a history of violence is another order of magnitude.
This is a simple mathematical fact.

So you can say whether or not someone trying to buy a gun is more or less likely than the average gun owner to commit murder.

Besides, if we take your logic to its natural conclusion then everyone should be able to buy guns. If we can't say who is more or less likely to commit a violent crime with their gun then why should we have background checks at all? Ted Bundy and Ed Gaines should be able to get guns under that logic.
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.