You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#11. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 30, 201014Year Member
Posts: 12,062
Reputation Power: 33737
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 30, 201014Year Member
Posts: 12,062
Reputation Power: 33737
The final product is phenomenal.
I enjoy looking at your ideas. :2thumbsup:
I enjoy looking at your ideas. :2thumbsup:
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#12. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 01, 20158Year Member
Posts: 600
Reputation Power: 45
#13. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 05, 201310Year Member
Posts: 2,743
Reputation Power: 449
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 05, 201310Year Member
Posts: 2,743
Reputation Power: 449
TechGraphix wroteCriticaI wroteOut of all of these. I only like the top left one.
It is very simple and would be easy to brand.
And the final outcome which the client was very happy with wouldn't be easy to brand??
I personally think (apart from you being full of shit) the top left one is very basic and stereotypical in a political way. Something you may find on a "vote for me" poster lol.
What Illy brought to the table and sold is top notch, apart from a few hiccups but if the client is happy then it's all good.
Simplistic and basic isn't always the best route to take.
Good day sir and well done Illy.
If you are a politician you are going to want your logo everywhere.
so when making print media,
ex. (brosures, stickers, apparel, signs, ect.)
it is a lot cheaper to use 2 colors than to use a gradient or 5-6 colors.
also
people in the real world don't really care how simple or complex a logo is,
as long as they like what the logo represents.
so when making print media,
ex. (brosures, stickers, apparel, signs, ect.)
it is a lot cheaper to use 2 colors than to use a gradient or 5-6 colors.
also
people in the real world don't really care how simple or complex a logo is,
as long as they like what the logo represents.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#14. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 24, 20149Year Member
Posts: 564
Reputation Power: 36
TechGraphix wroteCriticaI wroteOut of all of these. I only like the top left one.
It is very simple and would be easy to brand.
And the final outcome which the client was very happy with wouldn't be easy to brand??
I personally think (apart from you being full of shit) the top left one is very basic and stereotypical in a political way. Something you may find on a "vote for me" poster lol.
What Illy brought to the table and sold is top notch, apart from a few hiccups but if the client is happy then it's all good.
Simplistic and basic isn't always the best route to take.
Good day sir and well done Illy.
The first set would be a lot easier to brand because of the design, colors, etc.
The final logo is more of a candidates official symbol than a branding.
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#15. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 22, 201211Year Member
Posts: 3,432
Reputation Power: 377
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 22, 201211Year Member
Posts: 3,432
Reputation Power: 377
CriticaI wroteTechGraphix wroteCriticaI wroteOut of all of these. I only like the top left one.
It is very simple and would be easy to brand.
And the final outcome which the client was very happy with wouldn't be easy to brand??
I personally think (apart from you being full of shit) the top left one is very basic and stereotypical in a political way. Something you may find on a "vote for me" poster lol.
What Illy brought to the table and sold is top notch, apart from a few hiccups but if the client is happy then it's all good.
Simplistic and basic isn't always the best route to take.
Good day sir and well done Illy.
If you are a politician you are going to want your logo everywhere.
so when making print media,
ex. (brosures, stickers, apparel, signs, ect.)
it is a lot cheaper to use 2 colors than to use a gradient or 5-6 colors.
also
people in the real world don't really care how simple or complex a logo is,
as long as they like what the logo represents.
There is no gradient on the final one.
And there's only 2 colors (3 if you're counting white).
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#16. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 05, 201310Year Member
Posts: 2,743
Reputation Power: 449
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 05, 201310Year Member
Posts: 2,743
Reputation Power: 449
Illustrated wroteCriticaI wroteTechGraphix wroteCriticaI wroteOut of all of these. I only like the top left one.
It is very simple and would be easy to brand.
And the final outcome which the client was very happy with wouldn't be easy to brand??
I personally think (apart from you being full of shit) the top left one is very basic and stereotypical in a political way. Something you may find on a "vote for me" poster lol.
What Illy brought to the table and sold is top notch, apart from a few hiccups but if the client is happy then it's all good.
Simplistic and basic isn't always the best route to take.
Good day sir and well done Illy.
If you are a politician you are going to want your logo everywhere.
so when making print media,
ex. (brosures, stickers, apparel, signs, ect.)
it is a lot cheaper to use 2 colors than to use a gradient or 5-6 colors.
also
people in the real world don't really care how simple or complex a logo is,
as long as they like what the logo represents.
There is no gradient on the final one.
And there's only 2 colors (3 if you're counting white).
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Looks like a gradient to me.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#17. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 05, 201410Year Member
Posts: 2,359
Reputation Power: 244
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 05, 201410Year Member
Posts: 2,359
Reputation Power: 244
The last one is by far the best concept out them all.
Extremely well put together.
Would probably catch the eye of many politicians.
Extremely well put together.
Would probably catch the eye of many politicians.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#18. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 01, 20158Year Member
Posts: 600
Reputation Power: 45
CriticaI wroteIllustrated wroteCriticaI wroteTechGraphix wroteCriticaI wroteOut of all of these. I only like the top left one.
It is very simple and would be easy to brand.
And the final outcome which the client was very happy with wouldn't be easy to brand??
I personally think (apart from you being full of shit) the top left one is very basic and stereotypical in a political way. Something you may find on a "vote for me" poster lol.
What Illy brought to the table and sold is top notch, apart from a few hiccups but if the client is happy then it's all good.
Simplistic and basic isn't always the best route to take.
Good day sir and well done Illy.
If you are a politician you are going to want your logo everywhere.
so when making print media,
ex. (brosures, stickers, apparel, signs, ect.)
it is a lot cheaper to use 2 colors than to use a gradient or 5-6 colors.
also
people in the real world don't really care how simple or complex a logo is,
as long as they like what the logo represents.
There is no gradient on the final one.
And there's only 2 colors (3 if you're counting white).
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Looks like a gradient to me.
Illustrated wrote
There is no gradient on the final one.
The final one has no gradient...
Last edited by Branding ; edited 1 time in total
- 2useful
- 0not useful
#19. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 22, 201211Year Member
Posts: 3,432
Reputation Power: 377
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 22, 201211Year Member
Posts: 3,432
Reputation Power: 377
CriticaI wroteIllustrated wroteCriticaI wroteTechGraphix wroteCriticaI wroteOut of all of these. I only like the top left one.
It is very simple and would be easy to brand.
And the final outcome which the client was very happy with wouldn't be easy to brand??
I personally think (apart from you being full of shit) the top left one is very basic and stereotypical in a political way. Something you may find on a "vote for me" poster lol.
What Illy brought to the table and sold is top notch, apart from a few hiccups but if the client is happy then it's all good.
Simplistic and basic isn't always the best route to take.
Good day sir and well done Illy.
If you are a politician you are going to want your logo everywhere.
so when making print media,
ex. (brosures, stickers, apparel, signs, ect.)
it is a lot cheaper to use 2 colors than to use a gradient or 5-6 colors.
also
people in the real world don't really care how simple or complex a logo is,
as long as they like what the logo represents.
There is no gradient on the final one.
And there's only 2 colors (3 if you're counting white).
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Looks like a gradient to me.
You make me face palm so hard, did you even read the original post?
The whole first set was an initial concept that was not used at all.
The secondary versions with all the effects could be used for wherever they could be applied on digital things.
The primary version would obviously be the simple 2 color version, to be used for print and general branding.
But they doesn't even matter because it's not the final version, as I've stated more than once.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#20. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 15, 20149Year Member
Posts: 13,010
Reputation Power: 15478
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 15, 20149Year Member
Posts: 13,010
Reputation Power: 15478
Beautiful design there for your client the other designs are also good however the final one is the best.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.