You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
Answer to: "GPD's can't have viruses".
Posted:

Answer to: "GPD's can't have viruses".Posted:

VeXus
  • Resident Elite
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 07, 201013Year Member
Posts: 278
Reputation Power: 11
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 07, 201013Year Member
Posts: 278
Reputation Power: 11
You're wrong, GPD's can have viruses. Just like .jpegs can have viruses, anything can have a virus.

I just binded my RAT to a .GPD and made it fully FUD.

So the answer is: Yes, the .GPD can have a virus. - And even with your 'virustotal' virus scans (lol) it can be fully FUD and you can still get fuhked.

/answered

The following 1 user thanked VeXus for this useful post:

-Aesthetics- (12-09-2010)
#2. Posted:
KaplanCrunch
  • TTG Addict
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 01, 201014Year Member
Posts: 2,223
Reputation Power: 101
Status: Offline
Joined: Mar 01, 201014Year Member
Posts: 2,223
Reputation Power: 101
/epic fail

/jpeg cant have viruses

/binded it? ok lets see if you still connect.

/virustotal corrupts the stub in your crypted file making the file detectable

/learn smart skills

/gtfo wanna be hacker
#3. Posted:
KnOwNAsLeVi
  • New Member
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 01, 201013Year Member
Posts: 5
Reputation Power: 0
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 01, 201013Year Member
Posts: 5
Reputation Power: 0
Guy above doesn't know what a RAT is.
RATs can be binded to ANYTHING, google it FFS.
#4. Posted:
TTG_FlappyFire
  • Challenger
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 02, 201014Year Member
Posts: 144
Reputation Power: 6
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 02, 201014Year Member
Posts: 144
Reputation Power: 6
jpk98 wrote /epic fail

/jpeg cant have viruses

/binded it? ok lets see if you still connect.

/virustotal corrupts the stub in your crypted file making the file detectable

/learn smart skills

/gtfo wanna be hacker


You sir are wrong. JPEG files can have viruses.
#5. Posted:
KnOwNAsLeVi
  • New Member
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 01, 201013Year Member
Posts: 5
Reputation Power: 0
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 01, 201013Year Member
Posts: 5
Reputation Power: 0
jpk98 wrote /epic fail

/jpeg cant have viruses

/binded it? ok lets see if you still connect.

/virustotal corrupts the stub in your crypted file making the file detectable

/learn smart skills

/gtfo wanna be hacker


"Learn smart skills" LOL,
/Fail
/JPEG can have a RAT binded, I CAN SHOW YOU.
/inb4 rage
#6. Posted:
rapster20032
  • Junior Member
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 08, 201013Year Member
Posts: 95
Reputation Power: 4
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 08, 201013Year Member
Posts: 95
Reputation Power: 4
What the **** is this? You binded a RAT to a .gpd file, good job, now double click it and see if you can run it. You won't be able to, because its NOT AN EXECUTABLE FILE. Jpegs, CAN have virus' binded to them, if you know how, GPD's cannot. There would be no way in hell to have it execute with a .gpd, unless someone made virus that would infect a xbox, which would be pointless, and has not been done.

/Thread. +rep please.
#7. Posted:
iNFlux
  • New Member
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 20, 200914Year Member
Posts: 19
Reputation Power: 0
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 20, 200914Year Member
Posts: 19
Reputation Power: 0
jpk98 wrote
/jpeg cant have viruses

This, its not true...
JPEGs can have viruses, you can bind any file to your "server" in this case your RAT...
As soon as the person OPENs the file, meaning literally double clicking and opening, the server detects and is fully able to control it, then it duplicates the process over thousands of times, (Not visible) and copies itself to the windows directory...
But on the other hand, I am able to defend on your side of the arguement too... Seeing as no one ever does really OPEN a .GPD file... except if they were to edit it, but that would be opening it FROM the programme, not literally double clicking it to open...
So therefore, it is true that .GPD files cannot have viruses, unless even if it does, and you are dumb enough to actually double click it or something... Then, I'm sorry, but you just got hacked...
Anyways, thanks... If you want to ask anything else, I'm here to clarify, and even if you think it's wrong, then i'll clearly be glad to do a practical demonstration for you.
See, if someone else posted this they'd probably write what I just wrote, and tell you to "GTFO wanna-be hacker" but yeah, I'm not like that ;)

(Just to clear things out, i'm not hating on you, just a friendly arguement Don't take it offensively)

Yours,
Influx
#8. Posted:
TTG_Gold_Jake
  • TTG Destroyer
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 25, 201013Year Member
Posts: 7,353
Reputation Power: 336
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 25, 201013Year Member
Posts: 7,353
Reputation Power: 336
jpk is right in some respects...
The jpeg can have viruses but it doesn't execute the command...
Hence the reason why we have .exe, standing for executable
#9. Posted:
iNFlux
  • New Member
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 20, 200914Year Member
Posts: 19
Reputation Power: 0
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 20, 200914Year Member
Posts: 19
Reputation Power: 0
VeXus wrote You're wrong, GPD's can have viruses. Just like .jpegs can have viruses, anything can have a virus.

I just binded my RAT to a .GPD and made it fully FUD.

So the answer is: Yes, the .GPD can have a virus. - And even with your 'virustotal' virus scans (lol) it can be fully FUD and you can still get fuhked.

/answered


Now now, lets not get to hasty, mister.
So far as I know, no binder has got past the new Norton security 2010 -
I wouldn't normally consider Norton as a good antivirus, but it's hella' protective.
Trust me, you won't get past Norton security 2010, atleast, not yet ofcourse.
I've tried nearly every binder / FUD (100% etc.) crypters / binders, and when I say this, I mean like, its hard to access too, first you need to decrypt the password in order to download the crypter as in you have to translate / decrypt the code to get the password to the .rar file, and i've repeated this process about more than 60 times just to see if I or other people can crack it, Its just not possible at the very moment.

Sorry for the double post

Influx.
#10. Posted:
iNFlux
  • New Member
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 20, 200914Year Member
Posts: 19
Reputation Power: 0
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 20, 200914Year Member
Posts: 19
Reputation Power: 0
JakehIsJapanese_xD wrote jpk is right in some respects...
The jpeg can have viruses but it doesn't execute the command...
Hence the reason why we have .exe, standing for executable

Thats where the binding comes in, you bind a executable file ( your RAT ) WITHIN the JPEG, you can't just look at it and tell if its a EXE... Thats just not done.
Trust me when I say this, I've used RATs for a VERY long time.

Influx.
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.