You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
Wars of the United States of America.
Posted:

Wars of the United States of America.Posted:

kuneyo
  • Powerhouse
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 03, 201113Year Member
Posts: 478
Reputation Power: 18
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 03, 201113Year Member
Posts: 478
Reputation Power: 18
Only very recently i've hear the words 'War is trading blood, for oil'.

If you come to do very little searching you come to see that, not only with wars revolving around the USA, wars are all for oil, thus money and power.
The recent news about Syria, and so on, maybe this is not only a rant really.
If you are from the USA and in the military, I'm telling you to ask yourself: should I?

Syria is sitting on 50.1 billion barrels of oil, and 278.6 billion cubic meters of gas.

Why didn't they interfere in Libya? There is no oil, no gas, nothing to get.
Why did the whole world initially invade Iraq, and Afghanistan? There's money to take.

This is a big finger towards the United States government.
#2. Posted:
Georgasm
  • TTG Fanatic
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 20, 201113Year Member
Posts: 4,336
Reputation Power: 211
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 20, 201113Year Member
Posts: 4,336
Reputation Power: 211
The US and EU want/wanted to intervene in Syria because of the use of chemical weaponry, which I'm assuming you didn't know are classed as WMD's. The use of such weaponry has been banned since 1993, roughly 160 countries signed and agreed to never use chemical weapons.

It's not another business venture.
#3. Posted:
kuneyo
  • Powerhouse
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 03, 201113Year Member
Posts: 478
Reputation Power: 18
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 03, 201113Year Member
Posts: 478
Reputation Power: 18
Georgasm wrote The US and EU want/wanted to intervene in Syria because of the use of chemical weaponry, which I'm assuming you didn't know are classed as WMD's. The use of such weaponry has been banned since 1993, roughly 160 countries signed and agreed to never use chemical weapons.

It's not another business venture.

I do know that they wanted to interveine because of those weapons, not a single idea what WMD's are though.
#4. Posted:
Georgasm
  • TTG Fanatic
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 20, 201113Year Member
Posts: 4,336
Reputation Power: 211
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 20, 201113Year Member
Posts: 4,336
Reputation Power: 211
kuneyo wrote I do know that they wanted to interveine because of those weapons, not a single idea what WMD's are though.


'Weapon's of mass destruction', same thing nuclear weapons are categorized as.
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.