I hate people that say it sucks because Counter Strike should stay a PC game.
Maybe console players think that Call of Duty should stay a console game, but we don't, because we just don't give a f-ck.

i just dont like it on Console only good on PC

MiepG wrote It sucks cuz there's no quickscoping and u only get one life

You can quick scope. But you obviously don't know enough about the game to know that, so don't judge it.

I dislike it because, you cannot aim down your sites and you cannot sprint.

Fallencrazy wrote I dislike it because, you cannot aim down your sites and you cannot sprint.

Sprinting is unnecessary, as it is frowned upon by competitive players, for it leaves you at a disadvantage of not being able to use guns, as well as you being able to spawnrush in 5 seconds flat, basically. Having everybody's max speed balanced equals a more balanced game, so, let's say, for instance, you sprint straight down through the double doors in Dust II from T-Spawn, the common spot for spawn snipers, you would get mowed down instantly. You will then have the bridght idea to take the side door route or the side tunnel route, so the person who killed you, if they're playing tactically, knows this, and will ask a squadmate to guard each entrance, stating that you're a free kill because you try to spawn rush as if you're playing Call of Duty.

About the aiming down sights, it just makes it a fair fight for everyone, so you can't give the argument that you can't aim down sights fast enough, it allows quick reactions in precise moments. Also, since crouching decreases overall spread, it's basically like the action of aiming down your sights.

Basically, it's all about balance, so whiny people have less things to whine about when they die from being stupid.

RaitoKunRyuk wrote

Fallencrazy wrote I dislike it because, you cannot aim down your sites and you cannot sprint.

Sprinting is unnecessary, as it is frowned upon by competitive players, for it leaves you at a disadvantage of not being able to use guns, as well as you being able to spawnrush in 5 seconds flat, basically. Having everybody's max speed balanced equals a more balanced game, so, let's say, for instance, you sprint straight down through the double doors in Dust II from T-Spawn, the common spot for spawn snipers, you would get mowed down instantly. You will then have the bridght idea to take the side door route or the side tunnel route, so the person who killed you, if they're playing tactically, knows this, and will ask a squadmate to guard each entrance, stating that you're a free kill because you try to spawn rush as if you're playing Call of Duty.

About the aiming down sights, it just makes it a fair fight for everyone, so you can't give the argument that you can't aim down sights fast enough, it allows quick reactions in precise moments. Also, since crouching decreases overall spread, it's basically like the action of aiming down your sights.

Basically, it's all about balance, so whiny people have less things to whine about when they die from being stupid.

Thanks for making such a big response. But I think the real reason people don't like it is because it isn't a big title like Call of Duty, or Battlefield.

It's because they suck.

Atomic_Jamie wrote

-Aubrey- wrote GO seems to boring. not enough game mods etc...

Are you talking about game modifications?

Lol. If valve was allowed, they would make it able to download maps ect of the internet, so would a lot of games. Consoles restrict Valve. Consoles like XBOX360 are not allowed to have such content as apparently it poses a "Security Risk" to the console.

Mod's are available on PC, are you jealous?

iJarH3ad wrote

In fact, Counter strike used to be an extremely popular during old xbox year.
Counter Strike became a history when xbox 360 came out.
In few years later, Valve decided to bring the history back to alive so old fans can play it again like a old day.
If they hate it, let it be.

Source still has a large fan base. CS did not become history when XBox360 came out.